David's quote of David's essay brings to mind how I sometimes see Chorus
Jig (and other dances) danced here. First, concerning foot percussion
and clogging, that is sometimes a hint to the musicians to simply drop
out completely and let the feet make the music.for a few measures. That
happens here from time to time and is usually very well received.
Inactives sometimes (often?) try to fill in the quieter times with
additional swings. With Chorus Jig, inactives will often swing their
partner while the actives walk down the outside. Then, while actives
walk down the center, inactives may swing the inactive in the next set
behind them, breaking the swing just in time to cast off with the active
returning back down the center. Inactive indeed! - actually not at all
inactive in deed...
Rich.
David Millstone remarked on 3/6/2008 5:21 PM:
At the risk of overstating the case-- and thank you,
Jack, wherever you are, for
chiming in- I'll quote from another of David Smukler's essays. In this case,
he's discussing Chorus Jig but his comments about the role of the twos are
relevant in the Rory O'More context:
-----
Valuing the role of the "supporting cast"
As in many other chestnuts, the twos have an important and perhaps
underappreciated role... Just think of your slow progress toward the top of the
hall as paying your dues in the contra world. Keep dancing. Sooner or later,
whether this time or another, you will reach the head of the set. Your turn will
come to be a number one couple for time after time, supported by all those other
dancers whom you helped out on other occasions.
But, aside from the importance of being there for the ones, could it be that
there are other hidden opportunities in the number two role? Absolutely! First
of all, you have the gift of time. You can watch other dancers, and learn from
observing them, an increasingly rare opportunity in our contemporary
everyone-moving-all-the-time contra choreography. Some of this observation is
social (Who's dancing with whom tonight? Look at the amazing matching smiles on
those two!), and some is dance-related (Oh, that's how Mary and Tom do that
really neat balance!) (Aha! They only go six steps down the center and then they
take two full beats to turn alone).
Another benefit can be found in the reduced physical demand placed on you as a
dancer. After being active for a while, enjoy this time to relax as an
"inactive," required only to ensure that turning contra corners goes well. A
program that varies the activity level from dance to dance will allow more
people, young and old, to participate in dancing, and to feel energized and not
exhausted by their participation. However, if you are not ready for a rest, you
have an invaluable opportunity as a number two dancer to improvise some clogging
steps during the first half of Chorus Jig. This sort of "jigging"--a free-form
way to play along with the band--has become rare in the contemporary dance
scene. Freestyle clogging while standing out as a number two dancer is only
possible if the inactives are, well, inactive. If everyone is moving, there
simply is no opportunity for the solo foot percussion that resonated on dance
floors in years past.
Speaking of the band, the number two role also offers you the chance to devote
more of your conscious attention to the music.
------
As Jack says, some of these older dances really validate the notion of this
being a community-centered dance form, rather than the couple-centered activity
that many seem to think it is.
David
P.S. Shameless plug: CDSS is publishing Cracking Chestnuts, the collection of
essays by David S. and myself on some twenty classic dances. Music, detailed
commentary, an appendix with more suggested dances... We're told that it should
be available by this fall.
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers