As Amy and Elizabeth mentioned, I have also experienced 1s and 2s being the
CW and CCW couple, progressing along the side like in Becket. The big
difference is I'm pretty sure I learned it that the 1s whose backs are to
the inside of the circle are sliding L which would be going CCW along the
large set (but a Becket contra dance would indicate this to be CW).
Probably this is not a big problem. I learned this from square dance
"Kentucky Running Sets." A caller would have people arrange themselves in
groups of 4 in a large circle, with couples facing in or out together on
the same side of the set as their partner. Usually then there would be a
variety of square dance figures like swings, allemandes, this one cool
boomerang thing I can't remember what it's called, mountain do-si-do, dip
and dive, etc. Then 1s would slide left and 2s would stay where they are
for new neighbors.
I don't have any thoughts about which contra dances would be good for
Sicilian Circles, or whether all are possible or not. I think it's cool to
play around and figure it out, though!
On Sun, Feb 5, 2023, 12:00 AM <contracallers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
wrote:
Send Contra Callers mailing list submissions to
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
contracallers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
contracallers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Contra Callers digest..."Today's Topics:
1. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Charles Abell)
2. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Jonathan Sivier)
3. Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR other playful
strategies? :)
(Emily Addison)
4. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Winston, Alan P.)
5. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Amy Cann)
6. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Winston, Alan P.)
7. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Amy Cann)
8. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Joe Harrington)
9. Re: Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR other playful
strategies? :)
(Qui Ann)
10. Re: Sicilian Circle question (David Harding)
11. Rompin' Stompin' (Amy Wimmer)
12. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Jonathan Sivier)
13. Re: Rompin' Stompin' (Chris Page)
14. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Charles Abell)
15. Re: Sicilian Circle question (Elizabeth Bloom Albert)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Charles Abell <chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
To: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 20:06:37 +0000
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I may
soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
"twos", right?
2. If there *are* ones and two, which couple would be considered the
"ones" - CW or CCW?
3. If there *are not *typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea
for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to
arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
Thoughts?
Chuck
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:23:42 -0600
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
I have a Sicilian Circle dance in my collection called Dip for the
Oyster which designates 1's and 2's to determine who ducks or arches
first. In my notes I have 1's facing CCW and 2's facing CW. However, I
imagine this is totally arbitrary and you could do it whichever way you
like. In most of the Sicilian Circles I'm aware of there is no need to
designate 1's and 2's.
Jonathan
On 2/4/2023 2:06 PM, Charles Abell via Contra Callers wrote:
Hello group, It's been a while since I called
a Sicilian Circle, but I
may soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
"twos", right?
2. If there /are/ ones and two, which couple
would be considered the
"ones" - CW or CCW?
3. If there /are not /typically ones and twos,
has anyone tried
ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had
an idea
for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to
arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
Thoughts?
Chuck
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emily Addison <emilyladdison(a)gmail.com>
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 15:47:02 -0500
Subject: [Callers] Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR other
playful strategies? :)
Hey folks,
After a number of relatively quiet caller years (parenting; pandemic),
I've started to dig deep to expand my repertoire and up my skills. It
feels like it's time for lots more dance fun! :)
One dance that I've really enjoyed is Heartbeat Contra (by Don Flaherty -
see below).
Tom Calwell called it in Ottawa way back in 2010 and at the top of the
B1, he called Al R 1.5 or ANYTHING (R shoulder round, swing, DSD).
*Do any of you throw in a 'do anything' moment in an evening of contra
programming?* I'm always looking for fun, playful moments that make
dancers smile and this feels like a lovely one. If you throw in an
anything moment, how do you choose when?
*And do you have other strategies for adding playfulness to an evening?*
I've got some dances which I find super playful and fun (e.g., Three's
Company - Altered & Alternating - Paul Balliet)
Thoughts on this?
Thanks!
Emily in Ottawa
-------------------------------
Heartbeat Contra (Don Flaherty)
A1
Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
A2
Bal Ring & N Sw
B1
ROB Al R 1.5 *OR ANYTHING! *(Al R, Rshoulder round, swing, DSD...
original was RH round)
P Sw
B2
Cir L 3/4
Bal Ring & California Twirl
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
To: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>gt;, Charles Abell <
chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 20:47:32 +0000
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
To your questions:
1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or CCW
are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
"The Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
clockwise") do the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1.,
and it's fine so long as you get across who goes first. Way better to
indicate that visually rather than just say it.
-- Alan
________________________________________
From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I may
soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
"twos", right?
2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
"ones" - CW or CCW?
3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried ascribing
those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a dance
that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
Thoughts?
Chuck
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
To: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:11:52 -0500
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Here's how I learned:
"Everybody promenade the usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
stop where you are."
"Starting from this point right in front of me (gesture to where head
couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
"Half of you can just stay facing the usual promenade direction - you're
1s"
"Half of you will need to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
direction - you're 2's".
It links the role of 1s/2s to the familiar line-of-direction we use
for promenading and coupledancing
-- who feels most "normal", and who feels as if they're
accommodating/supporting.
On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
To your questions:
1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or CCW
are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
"The
Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the
1s ("those facing
clockwise") do
the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through
the 1., and it's fine
so
> long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
> visually rather than just say it.
> -- Alan
> ________________________________________
> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
may
soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
"twos", right?
2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
"ones"
- CW or CCW?
3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
ascribing
those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is,
I had an idea for a
dance
> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
>
Thoughts?
> Chuck
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
To: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 21:19:50 +0000
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Any —
That’s great! I hadn’t encountered that, and I really have to put it in
my toolbox for ONS - way faster/more fun than getting people who have no
idea what a Sicilian *is* to pair up and form one. (The best I had up to
this point was make a big circle, pick a pair and make them face, and then
(in Susan Michael’s words), say “Chain Reaction - pair up like this all the
way around.). So this’ll be good even for symmetric Sicilians.
— Alan
________________________________________
From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 1:11 PM
To: Winston, Alan P.
Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net; Charles Abell
Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Here's how I learned:
"Everybody promenade the usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
stop where you are."
"Starting from this point right in front of me (gesture to where head
couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
"Half of you can just stay facing the usual promenade direction - you're
1s"
"Half of you will need to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
direction - you're 2's".
It links the role of 1s/2s to the familiar line-of-direction we use
for promenading and coupledancing
-- who feels most "normal", and who feels as if they're
accommodating/supporting.
On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
To your questions:
1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or CCW
are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
"The
Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the
1s ("those facing
clockwise") do
the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through
the 1., and it's fine
so
> long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
> visually rather than just say it.
> -- Alan
> ________________________________________
> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
may
soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
"twos", right?
2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
"ones"
- CW or CCW?
3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
ascribing
those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is,
I had an idea for a
dance
> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
>
Thoughts?
> Chuck
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
To: "Winston, Alan P." <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu>
Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:39:39 -0500
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Glad you like it!
For what it's worth, at a ONS I often do a scatter mixer that's
basically half of "Haste to the Wedding" -
Circle L, circle R
Star R star L
everybody bow, promenade and find someone else
for a little, then turn the scatter promenade into the big ring and go
from there.
On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
> Any —
> That’s great! I hadn’t encountered
that, and I really have to put it in
my
toolbox for ONS - way faster/more fun than
getting people who have no
idea
what a Sicilian *is* to pair up and form one.
(The best I had up to this
point was make a big circle, pick a pair and make them face, and then (in
Susan Michael’s words), say “Chain Reaction - pair up like this all the
way
> around.). So this’ll be good even for symmetric Sicilians.
> — Alan
>
________________________________________
> From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 1:11 PM
> To: Winston, Alan P.
> Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net; Charles Abell
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> Here's how I learned:
> "Everybody promenade the usual
way, two-by-two around the room - now
> stop where you are."
> "Starting from this point right
in front of me (gesture to where head
> couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
> count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
> "Half of you can just stay
facing the usual promenade direction - you're
1s"
> "Half of you will need to turn
as a couple and face the 'wrong'
> direction - you're 2's".
> It links the role of 1s/2s to the
familiar line-of-direction we use
> for promenading and coupledancing
> -- who feels most "normal",
and who feels as if they're
> accommodating/supporting.
> On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via
Contra Callers
> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>> To your questions:
>>
>> 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
>>
>> 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW or
CCW
> are the "1s". You can just pick
which one you want.
>
> 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
> "The
> Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
clockwise")
> do
> the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1., and it's fine
so
> long as you get across who goes first. Way
better to indicate that
> visually rather than just say it.
>
> -- Alan
> ________________________________________
> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>
> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
may
> soon - two questions:
>
> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
> "twos", right?
> 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> "ones"
> - CW or CCW?
> 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
ascribing
> those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That
is, I had an idea for a
> dance
> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch first,
> thus the need for separate numbers.
>
> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
> Thoughts?
>
> Chuck
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joe Harrington <contradancerjoe(a)gmail.com>
To: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:49:36 -0500
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the 1s
and 2s are comparably active?
--jh--
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 4:39 PM Amy Cann via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Glad you like it!
>
> For what it's worth, at a ONS I often do a scatter mixer that's
> basically half of "Haste to the Wedding" -
>
> Circle L, circle R
> Star R star L
> everybody bow, promenade and find someone else
>
> for a little, then turn the scatter promenade into the big ring and go
> from there.
>
> On 2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
> > Any —
>
> > That’s great! I hadn’t
encountered that, and I really have to put it
> in my
>
toolbox for ONS - way faster/more fun than
getting people who have no
> idea
> > what a Sicilian *is* to pair up and form one. (The best I had up to
> this
> > point was make a big circle, pick a pair and make them face, and then
> (in
> > Susan Michael’s words), say “Chain Reaction - pair up like this all the
> way
> > around.). So this’ll be good even for symmetric Sicilians.
>
> > — Alan
>
> >
________________________________________
> > From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 1:11 PM
> > To: Winston, Alan P.
> > Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net; Charles Abell
> > Subject: Re: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
>
> > Here's how I learned:
>
> > "Everybody promenade the
usual way, two-by-two around the room - now
> > stop where you are."
>
> > "Starting from this
point right in front of me (gesture to where head
> > couple of center set usually stands for contras), you're going to
> > count off in pairs of couples and take hands four in this big ring.
>
> > "Half of you can just
stay facing the usual promenade direction -
> you're 1s"
>
> > "Half of you will need
to turn as a couple and face the 'wrong'
> > direction - you're 2's".
>
> > It links the role of 1s/2s to
the familiar line-of-direction we use
> > for promenading and coupledancing
>
> > -- who feels most
"normal", and who feels as if they're
> > accommodating/supporting.
>
>
>
> > On
2/4/23, Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers
> > <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> >> To your questions:
> >>
> >> 1: Right, the vast majority of Sicilians are completely symmetrical.
> >>
> >> 2: Because of this, I don't think there's a default for whether CW
or
> CCW
> >> are the "1s". You can just pick which one you want.
> >>
> >> 3. Yes, there are non-symmetric Sicilians -= I'm looking at notes for
> >> "The
> >> Molly Andrew", a waltz Sicilian; it has the 1s ("those facing
> clockwise")
> >> do
> >> the figure through the 2s and then the 2s through the 1., and it's
> fine so
> >> long as you get across who goes first. Way better to indicate that
> >> visually rather than just say it.
> >>
> >> -- Alan
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: Charles Abell via Contra Callers
> >> <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> >> Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2023 12:06 PM
> >> To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >> Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
> >>
> >> Hello group, It's been a while since I called a Sicilian Circle, but I
> may
> >> soon - two questions:
> >>
> >> 1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and
the other
> >> "twos", right?
> >> 2. If there are ones and two, which couple would be considered the
> >> "ones"
> >> - CW or CCW?
> >> 3. If there are not typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
> ascribing
> >> those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea for a
> >> dance
> >> that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to arch
> first,
> >> thus the need for separate numbers.
> >>
> >> I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially
> successful.
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Chuck
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> >>
>
>
_______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Qui Ann <quiann2(a)gmail.com>
To: Emily Addison <emilyladdison(a)gmail.com>
Cc: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:29:41 -0800
Subject: [Callers] Re: Do you add a 'do anything' move into a contra? OR
other playful strategies? :)
I call Hot Buttered Rolls by Perry Shafran and sometimes modify the B1 to
“pass P, shadow DSD” and then invite them to sort out with their shadow as
to what they want to do.
https://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/thecallersbox/dance.php?id=7821
Same with "Vote with Your Feet" by Bob Isaacs.
https://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/thecallersbox/dance.php?id=1956
In this video you can hear me say “do something” when it comes to that
part.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKP1xR-fjgk&ab_channel=albatrossace101
Jacqui
On Feb 4, 2023, at 12:47, Emily Addison via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Hey folks,
After a number of relatively quiet caller years (parenting; pandemic),
I've started to dig deep to expand my repertoire and up my skills. It
feels like it's time for lots more dance fun! :)
One dance that I've really enjoyed is Heartbeat Contra (by Don Flaherty -
see below).
Tom Calwell called it in Ottawa way back in 2010 and at the top of the
B1, he called Al R 1.5 or ANYTHING (R shoulder round, swing, DSD).
*Do any of you throw in a 'do anything' moment in an evening of contra
programming?* I'm always looking for fun, playful moments that make
dancers smile and this feels like a lovely one. If you throw in an
anything moment, how do you choose when?
*And do you have other strategies for adding playfulness to an evening?*
I've got some dances which I find super playful and fun (e.g., Three's
Company - Altered & Alternating - Paul Balliet)
Thoughts on this?
Thanks!
Emily in Ottawa
-------------------------------
Heartbeat Contra (Don Flaherty)
A1
Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
Bal Ring & Petronella Twirl
A2
Bal Ring & N Sw
B1
ROB Al R 1.5 *OR ANYTHING! *(Al R, Rshoulder round, swing, DSD...
original was RH round)
P Sw
B2
Cir L 3/4
Bal Ring & California Twirl
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Harding <dharding101(a)comcast.net>
To: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:52:30 -0600
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
There is a specific old dance bearing the name "Sicilian Circle". You
can find it in, for instance, this 1857 instruction book from the
Library of Congress.
https://www.loc.gov/item/musdi.094/ The name has
come to imply the formation and general pattern.
On 2/4/2023 3:49 PM, Joe Harrington via Contra Callers wrote:
> Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
> While certain dances came from long
ago with that label, wouldn't
> many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the
> 1s and 2s are comparably active?
> --jh--
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Amy Wimmer <amywimmer(a)gmail.com>
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 15:04:59 -0800
Subject: [Callers] Rompin' Stompin'
Hey All,
What are your favorite barn burner contras? I have a few, but they get old.
-Amy
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 17:18:12 -0600
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
It appears that in that book the dance formation is given as a
longways, duple, improper set. Not the circle of couple facing couple that
we typically connect to the Sicilian circle formation. The dance just
before it is the Spanish Dance and gives as the formation, "The first
couple at the head of the room, with their backs to the wall; the next
couple facing the first; the third couple with their backs to the second;
the fourth couple facing the third; and all the rest are formed in the same
manner, every two couples facing each other, without regard to numbers."
Then it says, "As each couple arrives at the end of the room, they
must turn round and wait for the next couple to meet them, the gentlemen
being careful to have their ladies always on the right hand.
This seems to be describing a longways dance instead of a circle.
Under Sicilian Circle it says, "This dance is formed precisely the same as
the Spanish Dance," so that would seem to be a longways dance as well.
I think I have read that Spanish Dance was also used in the 19th
century as the generic name for the circle of couples facing each other.
So were these dances described somewhere with the circle formation, or was
that just something that someone did at one point and it stuck?
Jonathan
On 2/4/2023 4:52 PM, David Harding via Contra Callers wrote:
There is a specific old dance bearing the name
"Sicilian Circle". You
can find it in, for instance, this 1857
instruction book from the Library
of Congress.
https://www.loc.gov/item/musdi.094/ The name has come to
imply the formation and general pattern.
> On 2/4/2023 3:49 PM, Joe Harrington
via Contra Callers wrote:
>> Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
>>
>> While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the 1s
and 2s are comparably active?
--jh--
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chris Page <chriscpage(a)gmail.com>
To: Amy Wimmer <amywimmer(a)gmail.com>
Cc: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:09:37 -0800
Subject: [Callers] Re: Rompin' Stompin'
What do you mean by "barn burner contra"?
Confused,
-Chris Page
Los Angeles, CA
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Charles Abell <chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>et>,
Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2023 00:13:28 +0000
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Thanks for the comments, everyone. Very helpful, especially the tip about
promenading into the proper formation.
I noticed no one has responded yet to the question about whether a large
number of contra dances could be run as Sicilian circles. I'd be curious to
hear what others say, but my instinct is that it would maybe be
problematic. The curvature of the format would seem to make heys and other
figures more challenging to execute - the spacing between minor sets might
also be impacted in that formation. So, for instance, when doing a sequence
like "alle right N1 1/2x along the side then alle left next N 1x", the
distance between N #1 and N#2 might easily be greater than in a regular
contra. Anyway, this is just an initial gut reaction - let's see what the
hive mind thinks.
As for "barnburner" dances, that's a broad term, and there are so many to
choose from. How about, as a starting bid, "From Here to Infinity" by Bob
Isaacs...
Chuck
------------------------------
*From:* Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
*Sent:* Saturday, February 4, 2023 11:18 PM
*To:* New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
*Subject:* [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
It appears that in that book the dance formation is given as a
longways, duple, improper set. Not the circle of couple facing couple that
we typically connect to the Sicilian circle formation. The dance just
before it is the Spanish Dance and gives as the formation, "The first
couple at the head of the room, with their backs to the wall; the next
couple facing the first; the third couple with their backs to the second;
the fourth couple facing the third; and all the rest are formed in the same
manner, every two couples facing each other, without regard to numbers."
Then it says, "As each couple arrives at the end of the room, they
must turn round and wait for the next couple to meet them, the gentlemen
being careful to have their ladies always on the right hand.
This seems to be describing a longways dance instead of a circle.
Under Sicilian Circle it says, "This dance is formed precisely the same as
the Spanish Dance," so that would seem to be a longways dance as well.
I think I have read that Spanish Dance was also used in the 19th
century as the generic name for the circle of couples facing each other.
So were these dances described somewhere with the circle formation, or was
that just something that someone did at one point and it stuck?
Jonathan
On 2/4/2023 4:52 PM, David Harding via Contra Callers wrote:
There is a specific old dance bearing the name
"Sicilian Circle". You
can find it in, for instance, this 1857
instruction book from the Library
of Congress.
https://www.loc.gov/item/musdi.094/ The name has come to
imply the formation and general pattern.
> On 2/4/2023 3:49 PM, Joe Harrington
via Contra Callers wrote:
>> Newbie question: Why is it called a "Sicilian" circle?
>>
>> While certain dances came from long ago with that label, wouldn't
many/most contras work, as long as the circle isn't too small and the 1s
and 2s are comparably active?
--jh--
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Elizabeth Bloom Albert <ealbert75(a)gmail.com>
To: Charles Abell <chuckabell(a)hotmail.com>
Cc: "contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net" <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Bcc:
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2023 22:01:30 -0600
Subject: [Callers] Re: Sicilian Circle question
Offering up the following:
*Burning Ring of Arches **by Elizabeth Bloom Albert*
Sicilian Circle. QUADRUPLE Progression dance
*Key: 1’s = Couples who are facing CW around circle*
* 2’s = Couples who are facing CCW around circle*
A1 1’s Arch, 2’s Duck under;
2’s Arch, 1’s Duck under;
1’s Arch, 2’s Duck under;
2’s Arch, 1’s Duck under
A2 Ladies Chain (to Neighbor)
Ladies Chain (to Partner)
B1 Ladies Alle-R 1 and ½
Swing Neighbor
End swing facing partner.
B2 Circle Left 3/4
Swing Partner
End swing facing original direction.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 2:06 PM Charles Abell via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Hello group, It's been a while since I called
a Sicilian Circle, but I
may soon - two questions:
1. Typically, one couple isn't considered the "ones" and the other
"twos", right?
2. If there *are* ones and two, which couple would be considered the
"ones" - CW or CCW?
3. If there *are not *typically ones and twos, has anyone tried
ascribing those roles for a Sicilian circle dance. That is, I had an idea
for a dance that ends with a square dance figure requiring one couple to
arch first, thus the need for separate numbers.
I did attempt to find an answer online and was not initially successful.
Thoughts?
Chuck
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
--
* Elizabeth Bloom Albert *
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net