2013/5/12 Greg McKenzie <grekenzie(a)gmail.com>
Maia wrote:
That's a really good point. I mean, one way
would be to focus my study
only
on people who self-identify as being
"in" the contra community... but,
how
would you suggest I go about finding people on
the fringes? I feel like
my
sample size will be kind of biased by who I'm
friendly with, which is
pretty much the quote unquote 'young hip flashy' dancers (who tend to be
super comfortable switching roles, largely queer, considerably poly and
sexually liberal, etc.).
Last night I attended the "Queer Youth Leadership Awards" dinner in our
county. State representatives, city council members, county supervisors,
and many other leaders in the community came out to celebrate queer youth
who have excelled in leadership in their high schools, etc.
Obviously there is some significant progress being made in our society
toward tolerance of differing personal relationships and preferences. I am
delighted with how well the contra dance movement has worked to adapt to
these changes. This is certainly an area where some study would be useful
for callers and organizers of contra dances.
Maia also wrote:
I also want to find the people who consider
themselves "contra community" but feel uncomfortable dancing switch, or
might look at a male-male and female-female couple and say "hey, why
don't
you split up and pair off m/f?"
I wouldn't say that the idea of a "contra community" is a myth, but I
would
question the usefulness of this concept in any objective study. I fear
that the idea of a "self-identified" community of contra dancers is almost
always a projection of the one making that determination. That's why, in
my study, I worked to obtain the most random sample I could of all those in
the hall at our dances.
I suspect that almost all of those in leadership positions in the contra
dance movement are enthusiasts of multiple dance forms, (defined as dancing
each form at least six times a year. Please let me know if this is not the
case for you, personally.) About HALF of those in the hall at our open,
public contra dances, however, will rarely, if ever, attend any other type
of social dance. Contras are their primary, or sole social dance activity.
I suspect that most of those who are most comfortable with switching roles
are also multiple dance form enthusiasts. The function of social dance as
a "mating ritual" may be much less significant for hard-core multiple dance
form enthusiasts.
I don't think I agree. I'm almost exclusively a contradancer, and it
definitely is a "mating ritual" or sorts for me, and that's precisely *why*
I
started to dance the other role: because I'm queer, and if I danced my
assigned role, I'd never get to dance with people I'm interested in, er,
"mating" with. Just to throw that out there. But that's the sort of thing
I'm really interested in exploring--WHY people do or don't dance switch,
what place contra holds in their life and social world and how that
does/doesn't impact the way they dance it, etc.
Michael (and everyone)--Oops, I realize that last email was not terribly
coherent. I didn't realize it was going out to the whole listserv, I
thought I was replying to just one person, so I was being silly and flip
and using joking-gender-studies slang. Please don't consider that my
research proposal! Sorry about that one, folks! =/
Maia
How can you make or evaluate any meaningful findings
about "contra
networks" without a comparison to other social networks, dance or othrwise ?
It's more that I'm attempting to make evaluations *inside* the contra
network.
Will your use of the "g" word, "
god," predispose bias into whatever
findings you eventually make ?
I'm confused. Are you joking?
Once you start saying things to dancers, such as
"hey, why don'tyou split
up and pair off m/f?" any findings become dubious
Again, I'm confused. I never proposed saying this to dancers, and certainly
not in the course of any study.
By considering your self a young hip flashy dancer
(whatever that means)
will make your doing any objective study difficult.
Every person who has ever done an anthropological study has had some sort
of identification in relation to the group they were studying, even if that
identification is "not of your group." It seems obvious to me that the
people who are most like to