Book vs. Web on Dance composer's Books
I recommend both. -- Print and web.
If you really want your dances called, you might mail your book
gratis, to the fifty or one hundred callers you know or want to know
better in the US, Canada, United Kingdom, and perhaps Europe and
Australia. And to give it to people you meet in person, and to future
callers and so on.
A book will make you get it right. It is good editorial practice,
since you can't change those damn books one they're out, until you
print more. No need to print a thousand. Even making a hundred or two
hundred go out into the world will be an effort and expense. You're
not going to make money on those books, by the way.
Books cause publicity to the composer and the dances. You want the
dances called, and you want to talk to callers and composers, right?
Newsletter mentions, and catalogue mentions help via the numerous
dance associations own humble newsletters.
Sales Catalogues and Newsletter:
One USA Example: Country Dance and Song Society for their store and
catalog and newsletter mentions:
www.cdss.org
CDSS's affiliates sometimes review books via their newsletters.
A commercial example: Elderly Instruments sells some dance composer
books, but not many, probably out of their retail walk-in store:
http://www.elderly.com/books/books.htm
WEB & BOOK efforts:
- Cary Ravitz updates his book of dances regularly, and also puts it
on the web. some of us keep track of the dances he drops and changes
by buying his book now and again. See:
http://ravitz.us/dance/
- Michael Dyke's index to published dances, mostly relies on dead -ree
publications. See:
http://www.ibiblio.org/contradance/index/index.html
A book can travel to a dance, a camp, onto a bus, car, plane and to
another caller or future caller, and it can be studied to see what
that particular composer's angle is. I know of one prominent New
England caller that brings books to the dance, and calls straight from
the book.
Web locations change and die, and how are you going to get a caller to
find your dance anyhow. On a 100 year perspective, the web page will
be gone.
Books allow you to get the dance, minimally into a dead tree archive,
plus all of the caller's dead tree archives, and into the hands of
folks not near a web site. Think summer dance camp or weekend
festival.
Archives: New Hampshire Library - Milne Special Collections.
New Hampshire Library of Traditional Music & Dance
-->
http://www.izaak.unh.edu/nhltmd/
Lloyd Shaw Foundation: apparently their archive is at the University
of Denver; see both:
-
http://www.lloydshaw.org/Resources/Periodicals.htm
and at Univ. of Denver:
-
http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-577270/Denver-University-s-Carson-B…
In the UK: English Folk Dance and Song Society:
http://www.efdss.org/library.htm
There are a couple of other dance archives, non-profit dance
associations. Other folks that have done a book might be persuaded
because of my humble answer to send their book for posterity to these
places too. I'm sure a couple of people will speak up on any "other"
archives there are.
And then there's the archive of mind, for those of of living and
thinking about the current tradition.
Tell us what you decide. (And get a graphic artist to do your cover.)
~Mark Jones
On 6/11/07, Chris Page <chriscpage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A question about publishing new dances.
(Let's assume for this argument that the dances are good, and
a significant number of other callers would be interested in them.
Publishing bad dances is a whole other issue.)
Is it better to publish them in a web site, or in book format?
(This is two sub-questions -- which is better for the person
publishing the dances, and which is better for the contra
dance community.)
Advantages of a web site:
-You don't lose money, or storage space with boxes of unsold
books. (I don't see anyone ever making money by published a
contra dance book.)
-It takes much less time to produce.
-It's not permanent, so you can update or fix it over time.
-It's free, supporting more the folk aspect of transmission.
Advantages of a book:
-It's permanent.
-It's more exclusive (you need to pay and order), so
hence it must be more valuable.
-There are fewer of them, so they stand out more.
-Hence, it's more prestigious.
(note that if they're a bad or lackluster collection of dances,
these advantages quickly become disadvantages)
Are there other reasons?
I've run across web sites (like Gene Hubert's or Rick
Mohr's) that rival the best of the individual printed books.
Then again, you can probably name books that have fallen
far short of expectations.
Thoughts? This is more than a theoretical question for me.
-Chris Page
San Diego
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers