30 Jan
2010
30 Jan
'10
5:46 p.m.
Earlier (a year or two ago) I e-mailed sharedweight a question or
comment about squares. It never got sent around.
At the time, I figured someone was filtering the various e-mails and
wanted to make sure the discussion was geared only towards contra.
Fine. Now I see that others can send questions etc. about squares.
Am I being treated any differently than other people who are signed
up for sharedweight?
When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the question and the
answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get to
see the question and then answer it before I get to see the
question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that I'm
always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm an
experienced caller).
If this is the case, I just want you to know that I rarely want to
respond to the questions and requests. I also realize that it's very
important for the new callers to voice their opinion and have a
discussion.
Am I being treated differently from the others?
Tom
On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:00 PM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
Send Callers mailing list submissions to
callers(a)sharedweight.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: squares for house parties of mostly contra dancers?
(gtwood(a)worldpath.net)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:05:26 -0500
From: <gtwood(a)worldpath.net>
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] squares for house parties of mostly contra
dancers?
Message-ID: <RZ88iPEv.1263935126.1308590.gtwood(a)worldpath.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
All this talk of Squares, and with Ralph Page weekend and all
reminded me that I found this on the web:
for all you Rabbit fans:
(we should always listen to the caller!)
the scene: 2 mountain gents trying to get the best of Bugs
of course Bugs turns the tables.....
Bugs Bunnys Square
Promenade across the floor. Sashay right on out the door.
Out the door and into the glade and everybody promenade.
Step right up you're doing fine.
I'll pull your beard you'll pull mine.
Yank it again like you did before.
Break it up with a tug of war.
Now into the brook and fish for the trout.
Dive right in and splash about. Trout! Trout! Pretty little trout!
One more splash and come right out.
Shake like a hound-dog. Shake again.
Wallow around in the old pig pen.
Wallow some more. Y'all know how.
Roll around like an old fat sow.
Allemande left with your right hand.
Follow through with a great left band. (?)
Now lead your partner the dirty old thing.
Follow through with an elbow swing.
Grab a fence post. Hold it tight.
Womp your partner with all your might.
Hit him in the shin. Hit him in the head.
Hit him again. The critter ain't dead.
Womp him low and womp him high.
Stick your finger in his eye.
Pretty little ring. Pretty little sound. Bang your heads against the
ground.
Promenade all around the room. Promenade like a bride and groom.
Open up the door and step right in.
Close the door and into a spin. Whirl! Whirl! Twist and twirl!
Jump all around like a flying squirrel.
Now don't you fuss and don't you swear.
Just come right out and form a square.
Now right hand over and left hand under.
Both join hands and run like thunder.
Over the hill and over the dale.
Duck your head and lift your tail.
Don't you stray and don't you roam.
Turn to your partner. Promenade home.
Corn in the cornfield. Wheat in the sack. Turn to your partner.
Promenade
back.
And now you're home. Bow to your partner.
Bow to the gent across the hall. And that is all!
On 1/19/2010, "Jeff Kaufman" <jeff(a)alum.swarthmore.edu> wrote:
We ended up doing melanie's triplet (twice) and ladies star. There
turned out to be several non-dancer people so I gave up on the
"no-walkthrough" goal. The dances went pretty well; thanks!
Jeff
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
End of Callers Digest, Vol 65, Issue 14
*************************************** 
29 Jan
29 Jan
6:06 p.m.
Hi Tom,
We have never filtered any e-mail for content that related to calling.
We love squares and this forum applies to calling them as well. You
are not being singled out for any different treatment.
We did get an e-mail from someone else that they were not getting all
of the messages. Seth is the technical side of our parnership, so
hopefully he can figure out what's going on. In the meantime, check
your spam filters to see if any Sharedweight messages are getting
caught there.
This is an equal opportunity forum. All opinions are welcome and
encouraged as long as they are presented with respect and tact. No
one's messages are reviewed before they are posted to the list. Please
let us know if you have any technical problems.
Sorry that it appeared differently to you.
Chris
On Jan 30, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Tom Hinds <twhinds(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
Earlier (a year or two ago) I e-mailed sharedweight a
question or
comment about squares. It never got sent around.
At the time, I figured someone was filtering the various e-mails and
wanted to make sure the discussion was geared only towards contra.
Fine. Now I see that others can send questions etc. about squares.
Am I being treated any differently than other people who are signed
up for sharedweight?
When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the question and the
answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get to
see the question and then answer it before I get to see the
question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that I'm
always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm an
experienced caller).
If this is the case, I just want you to know that I rarely want to
respond to the questions and requests. I also realize that it's
very important for the new callers to voice their opinion and have a
discussion.
Am I being treated differently from the others?
Tom
On Jan 20, 2010, at 12:00 PM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
Send Callers mailing list submissions to
callers(a)sharedweight.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: squares for house parties of mostly contra dancers?
(gtwood(a)worldpath.net)
---
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:05:26 -0500
From: <gtwood(a)worldpath.net>
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] squares for house parties of mostly contra
dancers?
Message-ID: <RZ88iPEv.1263935126.1308590.gtwood(a)worldpath.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
All this talk of Squares, and with Ralph Page weekend and all
reminded me that I found this on the web:
for all you Rabbit fans:
(we should always listen to the caller!)
the scene: 2 mountain gents trying to get the best of Bugs
of course Bugs turns the tables.....
Bugs Bunnys Square
Promenade across the floor. Sashay right on out the door.
Out the door and into the glade and everybody promenade.
Step right up you're doing fine.
I'll pull your beard you'll pull mine.
Yank it again like you did before.
Break it up with a tug of war.
Now into the brook and fish for the trout.
Dive right in and splash about. Trout! Trout! Pretty little trout!
One more splash and come right out.
Shake like a hound-dog. Shake again.
Wallow around in the old pig pen.
Wallow some more. Y'all know how.
Roll around like an old fat sow.
Allemande left with your right hand.
Follow through with a great left band. (?)
Now lead your partner the dirty old thing.
Follow through with an elbow swing.
Grab a fence post. Hold it tight.
Womp your partner with all your might.
Hit him in the shin. Hit him in the head.
Hit him again. The critter ain't dead.
Womp him low and womp him high.
Stick your finger in his eye.
Pretty little ring. Pretty little sound. Bang your heads against the
ground.
Promenade all around the room. Promenade like a bride and groom.
Open up the door and step right in.
Close the door and into a spin. Whirl! Whirl! Twist and twirl!
Jump all around like a flying squirrel.
Now don't you fuss and don't you swear.
Just come right out and form a square.
Now right hand over and left hand under.
Both join hands and run like thunder.
Over the hill and over the dale.
Duck your head and lift your tail.
Don't you stray and don't you roam.
Turn to your partner. Promenade home.
Corn in the cornfield. Wheat in the sack. Turn to your partner.
Promenade
back.
And now you're home. Bow to your partner.
Bow to the gent across the hall. And that is all!
On 1/19/2010, "Jeff Kaufman" <jeff(a)alum.swarthmore.edu> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
We ended up doing melanie's triplet (twice) and ladies star. There
turned out to be several non-dancer people so I gave up on the
"no-walkthrough" goal. The dances went pretty well; thanks!
Jeff
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
End of Callers Digest, Vol 65, Issue 14
*************************************** 
6:25 p.m.
Tom Hinds wrote:
When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the question and the
answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get to
see the question and then answer it before I get to see the
question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that I'm
always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm an
experienced caller).
I think this is because your subscription to shared weight is
currently set to "digest mode". This means you recieve at most one
message a day that contains all emails other people sent to the list
that day. Many other people (like me) have their subscription set to
send them messages individually. You can change this if you want, by
going to:
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/options/callers
and logging in (it will send you a password if you click "remind").
Then you scroll down to "Set Digest Mode" and set it to "Off".
Some people like digest mode because then they have less inbox
clutter; it's a preference thing.
Jeff
6:37 p.m.
Tom,
I just checked and your account is set to digest mode. You will receive
one message with all of the messages of the last 24 hours.
Are you saying that the original message is missing from the digest e-mail?
Thanks, Jeff.
Chris
Jeff Kaufman wrote:
Tom Hinds wrote:
When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the
question and the
answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get to
see the question and then answer it before I get to see the
question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that I'm
always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm an
experienced caller).
I think this is because your subscription to shared weight is
currently set to "digest mode". This means you recieve at most one
message a day that contains all emails other people sent to the list
that day. Many other people (like me) have their subscription set to
send them messages individually. You can change this if you want, by
going to:
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/options/callers
and logging in (it will send you a password if you click "remind").
Then you scroll down to "Set Digest Mode" and set it to "Off".
Some people like digest mode because then they have less inbox
clutter; it's a preference thing.
Jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
8:38 p.m.
I'm pretty sure my subscription is not set to digest mode, as I
receive multiple emails in a day. But I too have occasionally noticed
an email responding to one I didn't receive.
Richard
On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Chris Weiler (home) wrote:
Tom,
I just checked and your account is set to digest mode. You will
receive one message with all of the messages of the last 24 hours.
Are you saying that the original message is missing from the digest
e-mail?
Thanks, Jeff.
Chris
Jeff Kaufman wrote:
Tom Hinds wrote:
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the
question and the
answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get
to see the question and then answer it before I get to see the
question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that
I'm always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm
an experienced caller).
I think this is because your subscription to shared weight is
currently set to "digest mode". This means you recieve at most one
message a day that contains all emails other people sent to the list
that day. Many other people (like me) have their subscription set to
send them messages individually. You can change this if you want, by
going to:
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/options/callers
and logging in (it will send you a password if you click "remind").
Then you scroll down to "Set Digest Mode" and set it to "Off".
Some people like digest mode because then they have less inbox
clutter; it's a preference thing.
Jeff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
9:40 p.m.
Tom wrote:
Earlier (a year or two ago) I e-mailed sharedweight a
question or
comment about squares. It never got sent around.
At the time, I figured someone was filtering the various e-mails and
wanted to make sure the discussion was geared only towards contra.
Fine. Now I see that others can send questions etc. about squares.
Am I being treated any differently than other people who are signed
up for sharedweight?
When I recieve an e-mail from sharedweight, the
question and the
answers are in the same e-mail!!! It must be that the others get to
see the question and then answer it before I get to see the
question. Am I left out of the loop -like you're afraid that I'm
always going to jump in with my 2 cents (maybe because I'm an
experienced caller).
I have nothing to do with sharedweight administration, but it looks fairly
clear that you're signed up for the digest version of the list, which
automatically bundles up all the list traffic over some period and sends
it out to you.
If you want to get individual emails as they're sent, you need to not be on
the digest version. You can follow the web link in the footer of each message
to get to the page where you can login and change your subscription
preferences.
-- Alan
--
===============================================================================
Alan Winston --- WINSTON(a)SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone: 650/926-3056
Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA 94025
===============================================================================
5201
days inactive
5200
days old
contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net
5 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing -
Chris Weiler (home) -
Jeff Kaufman -
Richard Allen Fischer -
Tom Hinds