I have noticed that sometimes if a dance has a "dorky" figure in it,
a tune that's slightly different can help free people up to enjoy it.
A ragtime tune, a klezmer tune, a riff from rock and roll, something
that makes people want to be playful or to bounce or shimmy as they
dance, will free them up to enjoy the "dorky" part and be playful
with it.
On Jul 7, 2009, at 9:00 AM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
Send Callers mailing list submissions to
callers(a)sharedweight.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: "Limited Views" on Dorky Dances (Martha Edwards)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:56:00 -0500
From: Martha Edwards <meedwards(a)westendweb.com>
Subject: Re: [Callers] "Limited Views" on Dorky Dances
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Message-ID:
<7d8d864a0907061856k5d2b99c5gc67897718922d7bd(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
My own foray this year into attempting to broaden people's idea of
what kind
of dancing they liked has led me to this hypothesis: People become
comfortable with the dance figures and music AND social setting (!)
of one
dance form, and they dislike other dance forms in precisely the way
those
other forms differ from the one they're used to.
They say "I know what I like" but if you watch closely, you may see
that
it's really "I like what I know."
It's reasonable, really. Human evolution probably favors the
development of
people who find a safe way to live. If they don't venture too far
out of
their, let's call it, "culture", they survive. They have babies. The
adventurous are admirable, but they don't tend to stay home and
watch after
the kiddies. So, it makes sense that once your body has a certain
neurological "set", it may be pre-programmed not to like changes
very much.
I try to become a nice, healthy tea drinker, but every morning, I
just make
the coffee.
On the other hand, my kids made it to adulthood, and so I am
evolutionarily
free to be adventurous. Although contra is my village social, my
comfort
zone, I dance Greek, contra, swing, and salsa, and recently added
English
and (gasp!) Modern Western Squares. I have become "used" to feeling
awkward
and inexpert, and know the feeling passes.
I am sympathetic with those who have fought their way to competence
in one
dance form and are not about to give it up and feel awkward and
inexpert
again. I just wish I could figure out a way to help them stand it long
enough for them to experience the pleasures of other dance forms.
M
E
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, <gregmck(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
Well. Yes. I can see how many folks feel. Many of us encounter
rolling
eyeballs when we tell our friends about contras and we feel
compelled to
assure them that: "No. Its NOT like the goofy square dancing you
learned
in Jr. High. It's NOT about bouncing up and down, waving your
arms, and
making foolish animal sounds. Its actually very cool and you'll feel
comfortable doing it."
Then, when we finally drag these folks to a contra dance, the
caller does
one of "those" dances.
Is this being "limited" or "close-minded" (as one caller once
referred to
me)? Maybe.
If you want to see real "closed mindedness" just try fitting one
simple
mosh pit slam dance with recorded screaming rock music--for just ten
minutes--into your contra dance program.
The point is that "folk dancing" is an extremely "limited view" of
what
dancing should be. Contra dance is an extremely "limited view" of
what folk
dancing should be. And "folk music" is an extremely "limited
view" of what
music should be.
On the whole, I would venture to say that in many ways contras are
more
open to variation than most "folk dancing." We have seen electronic
instruments sneak in along with non-traditional percussion (such
as trap
drum sets), and many variations of dance figures.
Personally I think that the beauty, magic, and sustainability of
contra
dance comes precisely from the limits of the tradition that
governs it. It
is within that rigid traditional structure that people feel safe,
and free
enough to open themselves to others and to connect in
extraordinary ways.
This is not to say that I am a "traditionalist" by any means.
But we
should not try to "change the direction" of that tradition without
a clear
idea of what our common purpose is.
The real question is: What is your purpose? And what is the
purpose of the
majority of those who attend? Are you trying to "preserve a
tradition," to
"open folks to other dance traditions," or simply "to offer an open
community social dance with live music," or a combination of all
those.
...Or are we doing something else entirely? The answer will
surely vary
for each dance series or event.
This is a question seldom discussed yet it seems to be a central
issue
regarding how we organize dances and what the role of the caller
is. I
think that discussion would be very useful.
What is the purpose of our event and what is the caller's job in
realizing
that purpose?
Perhaps if we answered that question we might come to a better
understanding of why we sometimes get "hairy eyeballs" when we
wander off
into some more "limited" goal.
Just a thought,
Greg McKenzie
*********
Winston Wrote:
I think I'd believe how much of a hairy
eyeball you got. There
are a lot
of
people with very limited views of what ought to happen at a
contra dance,
and
they're not shy about letting you know. [I once saw somebody yell
"English!"
and refuse to do a bouree balance (not unlike an English setting
step) in
what
was otherwise a perfectly conventional longways duple improper
contra.]
(Wide assortment of *reasons* for not liking what they don't
like, and not
being willing to give a chance to what they don't know they won't
like.
It's
hard to influence the program and the dancer attitude very much
if you're
not
the main caller, and if your desire to change the direction isn't
shared
by
other callers. But anyway, if half of 'em sit down and grumble for
squares,
getting them to do a dorky (in a good way) scatter mixer to non-
Celtic,
non-old-timey, non-New-Englandy music is going to be a challenge.)
-- Alan
--
====================================================================
===========
Alan Winston --- WINSTON(a)SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL Phone:
650/926-3056
Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo
Park CA
94025
====================================================================
===========
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
--
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
End of Callers Digest, Vol 59, Issue 3
**************************************