It's my experience that some callers have a reputation that draws dancers -
it is not only bands who do that. It is also my experience that a larger
band isn't necessarily a better band, nor do they necessarily draw more
dancers than a well-loved small band. And if the payment is going on shares,
then when more dancers are drawn - for whatever reason and by whomever -
band and callers (and, in the case of our dance, sound person, a role the
band can choose to supply) get paid more and are thus financially rewarded
for the draw.
We don't cap the amount that the band gets. We have a different formula that
kicks in when the band is larger than five. Otherwise, when we have a large
band (sometimes we have as many as a dozen musicians on the stage) our
caller - who works VERY hard when the band is that large - would get almost
nothing. So we shift to a percentage system when the band gets larger than
five (this wasn't reflected on the spreadsheet). The band always gets first
dibs on bringing sound, and thus increasing their share of the take.
Perhaps it's different if someone is running a big dance and hiring
exclusively professional musicians and callers. But for us, as a small
community dance, (with a totally volunteer organizer) I'm pleased that most
of the folks who play and call at our dance do it for the joy and community
and we're happy to help them defray their expenses by dividing up the take
from the door. Our system attempts to do that as close to "fairly" as we
can.
-cynthia
-----Original Message-----
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net
[mailto:callers-bounces@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Will Loving
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 11:20 AM
To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Caller Fees
As both a dance series organizer and a caller, I'm thrilled that we are
having this discussion. Performer payment was the area that I spent the most
time talking with other organizers about prior to starting our Downtown
Amherst (MA) series.
Several posts have mentioned paying the band only a certain number of
shares, usually four, even if there are more than four musicians. Though
both the caller and the band are essential to the dance, this is presumably
being done to protect the callers pay. Now lets consider the other side of
the coin.
What if your band consists of only two musicians? The assumed "normal"
arrangement would be that everyone get's a 1/3 share. Now consider that the
band is bringing and setting up their own top-notch sound system. Normally
the person providing and working sound gets paid anywhere from $25-200, or a
full share, depending on the venue, whether they are supplying equipment and
their level of expertise (the high end being someone like Bob Mills). Next,
let's add in the fact that this particular band will draw substantially more
dancers, usually 25-50% more, than other 2-person bands.
Is it appropriate to pay the band more? In this scenario would it be
appropriate to pay the band 3 shares instead of 2? From the band's
perspective, they are not only bringing and doing sound, but are also
bringing in a lot of value/income for the dance and should be rewarded for
it. Isn't this the same as limiting a band to getting 4 shares to protect
the caller's pay, even if there are more than 4 musicians? Is the band
correct in wanting to protect their pay as well based on the extra value
they bring?
My guess from reading most people's posts is that you would in fact agree
with this, but some callers I've been talking with strongly disagree. I'm
interested to hear people's thought on it. As an organizer, I'm feeling a
bit caught between callers' feelings that 'equal shares for all performers'
is a hard and fast principle and the band wanting something for the extra
value they bring. From reading everyone's posts, talking with people and
looking at Jeff's spreadsheet, it seems to me that while there may be an
ideal of 'equal shares for all performers' (kind of like 'liberty and
justice for all') the reality of how pay is divided is quite varied.
I'm deeply committed to paying all performers/artists well for the efforts
and energy, including minimums and profit sharing. Our dance series is only
9 months old but we committed to doing this critical piece properly. We are
working hard to fund-raise for a high-quality and fully paid for sound
system so we can eliminate that as a weekly expense and have more money go
to the performers. We are slowly growing a reserve fund in order to be able
to guarantee minimums even when weather intervenes - such as the recent
tornados that came through Western Mass on our dance night.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Will Loving
Amherst Area Contra Dances
Amherst, MA USA
http://amherstcontra.org
on 6/18/11 10:32 PM, Sue Robishaw at sue(a)manytracks.com wrote:
Hi,
I know that "it varies" and probably quite widely, but I'm trying to
get
an idea of what is typically charged for one-time or
semi-regular dance
calling (not the high end festivals and balls and camps) or how receipts
are
divided between caller, band, and house. My interest
is as caller, band,
and
dance organizer so all input would be appreciated. You
can reply off-list
to
sue(a)manytracks.com.
Thanks,
Sue Robishaw, Upper Peninsula of Michigan
--
William M. Loving
Dedication Technologies, Inc.
7 Coach Lane
Amherst, MA 01002-3304 USA
will(a)dedicationtechnologies.com
Tel: +1 413 253-7223 (GMT -5)
Fax: +1 206 202-0476
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers