On Apr 13, 2025, at 2:36 PM, Amy Wimmer via Contra Callers <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: Does your dance group offer lessons before the actual dancing begins? We offer a half hour lesson (though many folks arrive late and miss some stuff) at the beginning of the dance to teach basic moves.

Gregory via Contra Callers <mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sunday, April 13, 2025 9:27 PM I have a few comments for you, Taco, thanks for your question. In teaching a new figure, whether you are doing it within the context of the dance or not, crucial information is where the dancer is going to end up. If they flub, no worries, as long as they are in the correct position to start the next figure. Always describe the end position in some fashion. Be wary of teaching a figure out of the dance context. When you get to the dance, you might have missed that this dance requires a different starting or ending position from what you had taught. Anticipate this! Plan ahead - ensure you are teaching the new figure EXACTLY how it appears in the next dance, which may mean putting people into a progressed or proper position first, which may in itself be confusing. I always teach in the context of the dance unless I feel an out-of-dance context adds something particularly illuminating for the dancers. I have taught heys for four starting in a large circle and using hands, then paring the group down until they're in a line of 4, which has worked well. I haven't yet seen a similar benefit to teaching other figures in that manner. Always demonstrate the figure. More information can be communicated with a visual, especially with beginner dancers. You should always explain yourself in more detail during the walkthough and specifically identify to the group what your short form is going to be while calling. It would sound like this: "Robins only, take left hands and turn around once and a half to end in each other's place. At the end of this Left hand turn, you will have traded places with the other Robin and be with your partner on the side of the dance, ready for Partner Swing. *In the dance, I'm going to call "Robins, Left to Trade* for this figure." Instead of the two options you proposed, "get better at calling" and "teach easier dances," I recommend this third option: identify exactly what is preventing you from achieving your vision and brainstorm several strategies for coping with or solving that problem. This is a collaborative approach. It means you need to solicit feedback from dancers in a meaningful way in order to understand what are the impediments, and you need to have a keen eye in observing the dancers while you call. Question like "Are people having fun?" might lead you to believe that nothing needs changing regardless of blunders or good walkthroughs. If people say "I can never figure out ...such and such..." then you've got something to work with. "Get better at calling" is an honourable goal but might be taking too much responsibility for the dancers' lack of experience or skill - I caution this for your own sense of burden and enthusaism. The above process in my group produced several confusion points. 1. People forgetting to change places with their partner while out during an improper dance. 1. This led me to call a lot of proper contras, or dances where it didn't matter what side you were on. I've been doing that for 3 years while people have been developing their other skills and I find they have much improved. Now improper contras are easier to focus on. Coloured wrist bands have also helped. 2. People circling too far or not far enough (which is really bad in dances like Tom Hinds' Nothing Contra) 1. I avoided dances like this, but also came up with a wrist band system to help people identify who is who and what role they're dancing. 3. People ending up on the wrong side after a swing 1. Wrist bands helped, but keeping with an asymmetrical swing hold and using the "pointy hands" concept from Louise Siddons did more 4. Lines getting strung out and consistently advancing down the hall farther than retiring back up to place, then not knowing why their new neighbour isn't right beside them but 7 feet away up the hall. 1. Still working on it!!!! Greg, from Winnipeg Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. *This is filler text that changes the size of the messages I send - an added layer of security * *for detection and identification of encrypted information using metadata.* Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. *This is filler text that changes the size of the messages I send - an added layer of security * *for detection and identification of encrypted information using metadata.* Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Sent with Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home> secure email. On Sunday, April 13th, 2025 at 12:01 PM, Taco van Ieperen via Contra Callers &lt;contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net&gt; wrote: _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net Taco van Ieperen via Contra Callers <mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sunday, April 13, 2025 2:01 PM Hi All, I've been thinking a lot about calling for beginner dancers. I've seen big changes in the last few years where our dances now often have more than 50% newcomers. As a relatively new caller. I have some observations and ideas, and I'd love perspective from people who are more experienced. Walkthroughs: With experienced dancers, you can do an efficient walkthrough and teach a figure in the context of the dance. With beginners, I've seen walkthroughs fall apart because by the time you've explained a move and dealt with the group that has gotten all scrambled, the dancers have completely forgotten where they are in the walkthrough and where they started the dance. This is leading me towards the idea of isolating new figures *before* the walkthrough: If it's the first time doing a move, teach the move first, and then do the walkthrough that includes this move. "This dance has a new figure called a Robin's Chain. It works like this.... <chain stuff>. That looks great. Now let's learn the dance...." Also, with experienced dancers, people "get it" during the dance, so you can do two walkthroughs and even if some people are confused ii will straighten itself out. With new dancers it feels much more important that everyone succeed in the walkthroughs because confusion can get worse instead of better. But at some point you can't keep doing walkthroughs. My gut instinct is that if I teach the figures before and can't explain the dance in two walkthroughs then I need to get better at walkthroughs or teach easier dances. Thoughts? Caller Style: I really like making each call four counts as it provides predictable rhythm to the calling: 1,2,3,4,   WITH your | PARTner | BALance and | SWING For some calls I can give the destination location, or the destination person: "Robins, Chain, Across the, Set" "Neighbor, Dosido, to NEW, Neighbor" vs "Robins, Chain, To your, Partner" "Neighbor, DoSido, Once and a, half" To your partner seems more clear, but I can also see that having two different people in the call could create confusion. Does one format work better in your experience? Related, I find the most annoying figures to call are 1.5 figures. There's just no way to say "New Neighbor Allemande Left Once and a Half" in four beats. Also, beginners struggle parsing 1.5x as trading places, especially across the set. It seems like a lot of callers drop the Allemande and just shorten it to "Left" or "Right". Which probably is fine after two clear walkthroughs. So, which do you prefer? Do you have other ideas? Robins, Allemande, Left, Across Robins, Left, to Trade, places Robins, Left, Once,  and a Half Robins, Left, to Your, Partner Robins, Do si, do, across Anyway, just thinking aloud and curious what other peoples thoughts are. Taco _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net

Katherine Kitching via Contra Callers <mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sunday, April 13, 2025 5:56 PM Hello Taco et al! Our group in Halifax sounds very similar to the one you describe, with about 50% newcomers each night.  I'm passionate about the "system" I've set up for our group so I'm going to share lots of detail here!   I certainly don't expect most of you to read it  :D Also, (and this may not be reflective of your group Taco), we don't have a very serious or committed group of regulars - we hold 8 dances per year and because everyone's lives are busy, our regulars may only make it to 50-75% of our annual dances, so many of our regulars are only dancing say, 4 x per year.  So they are not progressing very quickly, and in fact sometimes forgetting what they learned due to sparse attendance :)  So even our "upper echelon" dancers are not great contra dancers for the most part -- they just love the concept of our up-beat, gender-free, awesome-live-music, zesty dances.... and are pretty tolerant to reviewing things each time they come.  More experienced dancers also tend to skip the first 30-45 minutes of the evening, unless they happen to love the beginner-friendly stuff (which some do!). With this environment, I've come up with a few strategies to try to keep everything moving along, while also ensuring the newcomers feel confident, well integrated and don't "blow up" the dances. I would say a lot of what we are doing is along the same lines of what you've been thinking, and works well for us. Specifically: - At the start of the evening I am almost always using 4 beats for my calls, to give folks lots of head's up. - I also try to think about the importance of *order* of the words. For example, I'll say, "left hands in for a left hand star" - the first few times I call it.  They may not remember exactly what a star is or how to do it, but if they get their left hand in the middle first, they are set up for success. I'll also say "With your neighbour left shoulder 'round" So the first thing they hear is neighbour - ok - they are looking at the right person-- Then they hear "left" so they are figuring out which side of the body to use And finally the figure itself.  Again- my thinking is: if they first find the correct person, and then have a moment to process which side of the body to use, the rest should flow well! To your question about different ways to call say, the Robins chain or DSD 1.5  to new neighbour... For the chain, if I'm using it in a beginner-heavy dance I will have taught thoroughly as my "feature figure" (see more on that below) - so I'm not worried about how i call it during the dancing..... I feel confident they know it inside and out by that point.  I agree that it is difficult to just "throw in there" in a dance where you have 50% newbies.  I think it takes special attention and practice. for DSD 1.5 to new neighbour, I think it's definitely more important to remind them they are going to a new neighbour than to quantify how much of a do si do it is.  (Personally as a dancer, I find anything to do with math during the dance to be too much to handle - I LOVE it when a caller says, "circle left 3 places to meet your partner on the side" - because I simply cannot count 3 places while dancing - so finding my partner is the target that works for me). And as Amy suggests, starting 4 beats ahead of the figure but finishing the call once they've started the figure can work well sometimes... e.g. "1- 2-3-4- now with your neighbour do-si-do-  all the way around and a little bit more to the NEW neighbour then swing with them!" RE what you wrote here- I agree, hard to call these ones efficiently! "There's just no way to say"New Neighbor Allemande Left Once and a Half" in four beats. So, which do you prefer? Do you have other ideas? Robins, Allemande, Left, Across Robins, Left, to Trade, places Robins, Left, Once,  and a Half Robins, Left, to Your, Partner As I wrote above, I think identifying the final destination is most important - so yes, I would probably say, "Robins by the left, to trade places!"  Or "Robins by the left, to find your partner!" OUR DANCE OUTLINE - We have a 10 minute "intro session" where we cover the basic concepts of how to stand relative to your partner (Larks on left, Robins on right); the concept of effective holds, effective movements (I don't use the term "giving weight" but we talk about various ways to be courteous and create elastic fun when joining hands with others, including the importance of feeling "sproing!" in your balances), and I also teach at least two figures. Usually we cover a right/left allemande (which we call a right-hand or left-hand turn just to keep the terminology as directly linked to the action as possible to keep it simpler on the brain)... and either a rt-hand balance or a two-hand balance. I choose two figures that will be featured in the first mixer dance of the evening. - We start with the spiral dance (snake dance) which leads off with some circling right/left, walking into the centre and back - I don't do any walk-through for this dance - I get the band to start plying right away and I give sponteanous calls to the music-- people learn while listening to the music and feeling the phrasing in their body.  It's a great warm up to the evening and the experienced dancers love it too. - We next do a very simple circle mixer, which will feature at least one if not two of the figures taught in the intro, and nothing else new. - Then, for each dance after this, we start in a big "teaching circle" -- and I introduce just one new figure prior to each dance. The figure is demo'd, and then folks get to try it with their partner... in a collegial environment where everyone can see each other and (most importantly) everyone can clearly see me in the centre. - The next dance of the evening is in a modified sicilian circle, with becket progression (Partners are either facing in to the circle or out of the circle and they slide left to progress).  Currently (thanks to a great suggestion on this listserve which I shall be forever grateful for!!!) we are dancing only in Becket in my group, to keep things simpler and allow me to call the option of "two hand turn OR swing with your partner" from early on -- being able to swing early on keeps our experienced dancers engaged - but newbies do not have to remember to switch places after the turn... and the simple Becket ejection means they don't have to switch places on the end either. - After the Sicilian circle becket, i set up the teaching circle again and teach one new figure. Then I set up 3 duples in the centre and demonstrate dancing in contra lines, Becket formation, with a few simple progressions like "slide left", "long lines fwd and slide left on way back", "circle left and keep circling to slide left to the new couple" etc.  We discuss and observe what happens when a couple reaches the end of the line.  Then we add in one more couple (so we have 3.5 duples) to show folks how that changes the pattern. - Then everyone forms contra lines and (without music) I call a random assortment of figures, while also progressing the lines frequently, so everyone has a chance to get ejected at least once.  If we have a big crowd, I'll force them into an excess number of shorter lines so that this part goes faster- then we reform fewer, longer lines before the next walkthrough. - Then we walk through our first "real" contra dance, and dance it. - For this first "real" contra and also at least one more after that, nobody ever leaves home place-- that is, all the figures are simple ones like do si do, left/right allemande, circle left/right, LLFB, partner balance and two hand turn/(optional swing), that have people coming back to their home place after 8 or 16 counts. -After each dance we have a break, ppl switch partners, and we are back to the teaching circle once again. - The evening continues like this - walk through, dance, quick break + find new partner,  form big teaching circle & introduce one new figure, form contra lines and walk through, dance.... throughout the evening.  We are never in the teaching circle for very long, and to keep the experienced folks interested, I always try to think of a stylistic pointer I can give them, for even the simplest of figures, so everyone is learning something. - We also rarely have to do more than one walkthrough with this method, because I have carefully built up their skills and confidence step-by-step through the evening, so they are never getting lost or overwhelmed. - After 2-3 dances in contra lines, I announce that it's now time to learn our "feature figure" of the evening.  The "feature figure" is one that I consider complex for our group. This has included in the past - Ravens chain (always starting with 2 consecutive ravens chains so ppl come back to home place) - Larks chain (as above) - Hey - SWL w Rory O'Moore - Mad robin - Something that involves a modified Cali twirl (in our gender free dances I just say the Robins must pass in front... they don't necessarily have to go under someone's arm). - We come to the good old teaching circle for this, and we spend as much time as is needed learning and practicing the figure (in couples and/or duples as is relevant), until everyone feels confident in it. Again, for those who know it well already, I try to share stylistic pointers so they have something to focus on as they practice. And I'm always looking for ways to ensure the teaching is thorough but doesn't suck up too much time, and I take note each time I teach a "feature figure" on what went well and what took too much time, so I can streamline for next time. I've learned that for teaching the Hey for example, it's handy to have some big posters on the walls, where I draw the "shape" of the movement. A picture is, as they say, worth a thousand words in this case! :) - I then call 2-3 more dances which are relatively simple.... except at least 2 of them contain that "feature figure".  To be clear, other than that feature figure, nothing else complex is added, we continue to use the skills we've developed so far that evening.... Then (about 2 hours into the dance at this point), we announce that we are switching gears, to the "advanced" segment of our evening. We explain that to keep things interesting for our returning dancers, we are now going to focus on them- there will be less explaining and things will move faster, and the dances will get a fair bit more complicated.  We say that from this point onward, beginners are totally welcome and encouraged to keep dancing, but they should start in the designated "I'm not sure what I'm doing but I want to give it a try!" line. Others who feel more confident are told to dance in the "yeah, I think I've got this!" line. This was an experiment we started two years ago, and it has worked really well so it is now an established feature of our dances. It means the last 45 minutes of our dance goes much more like what I *imagine* a "regular" contra dance in the USA goes like - It is assumed everyone knows all the figures, I do 1 walkthrough only, and then we just start dancing and people iron out the kinks on the fly. the fun thing is, if anyone in the "experienced" line is having a real hard time and getting stressed, they can move themselves over to the "beginner" line during the dancing and chill themselves out.  And if anyone in the beginner line feels like they have really aced it, they can graduate themselves to the "experienced" line during the dancing. Sometimes the "beginner" line totally falls apart and descends into mayhem - but people are laughin gand having a great time because they chose to be there and the expectations are low for them.  And sometimes the beginner line eventually nails it, and they all look so satisfied with themselves! At this point in the evening we still use the "teaching circle" sometimes - but usually just to demo the dance if it's really complicated. For the beginners, it's eye-opening to them to see how complex contra dancing can be, and they are truly amazed!  (Then they are even more amazed when I tell them that even our "advanced" dances are considered simple in most contra circles, and the really complex contra dances are so complicated that I can't even understand or call them myself, hah!) Hope this is helpful :) Kat _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net Amy Wimmer via Contra Callers <mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sunday, April 13, 2025 3:36 PM Does your dance group offer lessons before the actual dancing begins? We offer a half hour lesson (though many folks arrive late and miss some stuff) at the beginning of the dance to teach basic moves. For a lesson I've found that starting with very simple moves (walking to the beat, circle, allemande, do-si-do, etc.) and progressing to more involved moves (swing, courtesy turn, right/left through, chain, etc.) helps. If I know I'll have lots of beginners I choose dances that are very simple to start, then add only one new move with each successive dance. I encourage experienced dancers to partner with beginners so they may learn quicker. As to using 4 beats per call: you don't have to get all the words out before the move begins. For example, with a circle left 3 places you can start on beat 7 and say, "Circle left," wait for a beat, then say, "3 places." They'll hear the "what to do" and start that, then they will have the head space to hear "how far." I agree with Mac that you may be trying to teach dances that are just too hard for the crowd to have success. Also, if you can practice calling with a small group of experienced dancers, say at a house party, you'll get the practice you need in a much less stressful environment. Best of luck to you. -Amy Wimmer Seattle _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net Mac Mckeever via Contra Callers <mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sunday, April 13, 2025 2:56 PM You might be getting way to difficult for the crowd you describe.  Having half experienced dancers is about the threshold for doing duple minor contras. I like to stick to dances that are harder to mess up. Circles, some simple squares, scatter mixers, grand march, Virginia Reel, etc.  Missing a progression in a contra can break down the whole set. You mentioned chains - I find courtesy turns are one of the hardest things for beginners to figure out.  I'd avoid them. I have called many evenings without doing any contras.  In groups with lots of beginners - I build up to them and then carefully introduce some with very easy progressions and where ending a swing on the correct side is not all that important Mac McKeever On Sunday, April 13, 2025 at 12:01:40 PM CDT, Taco van Ieperen via Contra Callers &lt;contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net&gt; wrote: Hi All, I've been thinking a lot about calling for beginner dancers. I've seen big changes in the last few years where our dances now often have more than 50% newcomers. As a relatively new caller. I have some observations and ideas, and I'd love perspective from people who are more experienced. Walkthroughs: With experienced dancers, you can do an efficient walkthrough and teach a figure in the context of the dance. With beginners, I've seen walkthroughs fall apart because by the time you've explained a move and dealt with the group that has gotten all scrambled, the dancers have completely forgotten where they are in the walkthrough and where they started the dance. This is leading me towards the idea of isolating new figures *before* the walkthrough: If it's the first time doing a move, teach the move first, and then do the walkthrough that includes this move. "This dance has a new figure called a Robin's Chain. It works like this.... <chain stuff>. That looks great. Now let's learn the dance...." Also, with experienced dancers, people "get it" during the dance, so you can do two walkthroughs and even if some people are confused ii will straighten itself out. With new dancers it feels much more important that everyone succeed in the walkthroughs because confusion can get worse instead of better. But at some point you can't keep doing walkthroughs. My gut instinct is that if I teach the figures before and can't explain the dance in two walkthroughs then I need to get better at walkthroughs or teach easier dances. Thoughts? Caller Style: I really like making each call four counts as it provides predictable rhythm to the calling: 1,2,3,4,    WITH your | PARTner | BALance and | SWING For some calls I can give the destination location, or the destination person: "Robins, Chain, Across the, Set" "Neighbor, Dosido, to NEW, Neighbor" vs "Robins, Chain, To your, Partner" "Neighbor, DoSido, Once and a, half" To your partner seems more clear, but I can also see that having two different people in the call could create confusion. Does one format work better in your experience? Related, I find the most annoying figures to call are 1.5 figures. There's just no way to say "New Neighbor Allemande Left Once and a Half" in four beats. Also, beginners struggle parsing 1.5x as trading places, especially across the set. It seems like a lot of callers drop the Allemande and just shorten it to "Left" or "Right". Which probably is fine after two clear walkthroughs. So, which do you prefer? Do you have other ideas? Robins, Allemande, Left, Across Robins, Left, to Trade, places Robins, Left, Once, and a Half Robins, Left, to Your, Partner Robins, Do si, do, across Anyway, just thinking aloud and curious what other peoples thoughts are. Taco _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net Taco van Ieperen via Contra Callers <mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net> Sunday, April 13, 2025 2:01 PM Hi All, I've been thinking a lot about calling for beginner dancers. I've seen big changes in the last few years where our dances now often have more than 50% newcomers. As a relatively new caller. I have some observations and ideas, and I'd love perspective from people who are more experienced. Walkthroughs: With experienced dancers, you can do an efficient walkthrough and teach a figure in the context of the dance. With beginners, I've seen walkthroughs fall apart because by the time you've explained a move and dealt with the group that has gotten all scrambled, the dancers have completely forgotten where they are in the walkthrough and where they started the dance. This is leading me towards the idea of isolating new figures *before* the walkthrough: If it's the first time doing a move, teach the move first, and then do the walkthrough that includes this move. "This dance has a new figure called a Robin's Chain. It works like this.... <chain stuff>. That looks great. Now let's learn the dance...." Also, with experienced dancers, people "get it" during the dance, so you can do two walkthroughs and even if some people are confused ii will straighten itself out. With new dancers it feels much more important that everyone succeed in the walkthroughs because confusion can get worse instead of better. But at some point you can't keep doing walkthroughs. My gut instinct is that if I teach the figures before and can't explain the dance in two walkthroughs then I need to get better at walkthroughs or teach easier dances. Thoughts? Caller Style: I really like making each call four counts as it provides predictable rhythm to the calling: 1,2,3,4,   WITH your | PARTner | BALance and | SWING For some calls I can give the destination location, or the destination person: "Robins, Chain, Across the, Set" "Neighbor, Dosido, to NEW, Neighbor" vs "Robins, Chain, To your, Partner" "Neighbor, DoSido, Once and a, half" To your partner seems more clear, but I can also see that having two different people in the call could create confusion. Does one format work better in your experience? Related, I find the most annoying figures to call are 1.5 figures. There's just no way to say "New Neighbor Allemande Left Once and a Half" in four beats. Also, beginners struggle parsing 1.5x as trading places, especially across the set. It seems like a lot of callers drop the Allemande and just shorten it to "Left" or "Right". Which probably is fine after two clear walkthroughs. So, which do you prefer? Do you have other ideas? Robins, Allemande, Left, Across Robins, Left, to Trade, places Robins, Left, Once,  and a Half Robins, Left, to Your, Partner Robins, Do si, do, across Anyway, just thinking aloud and curious what other peoples thoughts are. Taco _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net

You might be getting way to difficult for the crowd you describe. Having half experienced dancers is about the threshold for doing duple minor contras. I like to stick to dances that are harder to mess up. Circles, some simple squares, scatter mixers, grand march, Virginia Reel, etc. Missing a progression in a contra can break down the whole set. You mentioned chains - I find courtesy turns are one of the hardest things for beginners to figure out. I'd avoid them. I have called many evenings without doing any contras. In groups with lots of beginners - I build up to them and then carefully introduce some with very easy progressions and where ending a swing on the correct side is not all that important Mac McKeever On Sunday, April 13, 2025 at 12:01:40 PM CDT, Taco van Ieperen via Contra Callers &lt;contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net&gt; wrote: Hi All, I've been thinking a lot about calling for beginner dancers. I've seen big changes in the last few years where our dances now often have more than 50% newcomers. As a relatively new caller. I have some observations and ideas, and I'd love perspective from people who are more experienced. Walkthroughs: With experienced dancers, you can do an efficient walkthrough and teach a figure in the context of the dance. With beginners, I've seen walkthroughs fall apart because by the time you've explained a move and dealt with the group that has gotten all scrambled, the dancers have completely forgotten where they are in the walkthrough and where they started the dance. This is leading me towards the idea of isolating new figures *before* the walkthrough: If it's the first time doing a move, teach the move first, and then do the walkthrough that includes this move. "This dance has a new figure called a Robin's Chain. It works like this.... <chain stuff>. That looks great. Now let's learn the dance...." Also, with experienced dancers, people "get it" during the dance, so you can do two walkthroughs and even if some people are confused ii will straighten itself out. With new dancers it feels much more important that everyone succeed in the walkthroughs because confusion can get worse instead of better. But at some point you can't keep doing walkthroughs. My gut instinct is that if I teach the figures before and can't explain the dance in two walkthroughs then I need to get better at walkthroughs or teach easier dances. Thoughts? Caller Style: I really like making each call four counts as it provides predictable rhythm to the calling: 1,2,3,4, WITH your | PARTner | BALance and | SWING For some calls I can give the destination location, or the destination person: "Robins, Chain, Across the, Set" "Neighbor, Dosido, to NEW, Neighbor" vs "Robins, Chain, To your, Partner" "Neighbor, DoSido, Once and a, half" To your partner seems more clear, but I can also see that having two different people in the call could create confusion. Does one format work better in your experience? Related, I find the most annoying figures to call are 1.5 figures. There's just no way to say "New Neighbor Allemande Left Once and a Half" in four beats. Also, beginners struggle parsing 1.5x as trading places, especially across the set. It seems like a lot of callers drop the Allemande and just shorten it to "Left" or "Right". Which probably is fine after two clear walkthroughs. So, which do you prefer? Do you have other ideas? Robins, Allemande, Left, Across Robins, Left, to Trade, places Robins, Left, Once, and a Half Robins, Left, to Your, Partner Robins, Do si, do, across Anyway, just thinking aloud and curious what other peoples thoughts are. Taco _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net

Hi All, I've been thinking a lot about calling for beginner dancers. I've seen big changes in the last few years where our dances now often have more than 50% newcomers. As a relatively new caller. I have some observations and ideas, and I'd love perspective from people who are more experienced. Anyway, just thinking aloud and curious what other peoples thoughts are. Taco _______________________________________________ Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net