John Sweeney raises an interesting point about the differences in styling between 19th
century quadrilles (Tony Parkes's definition 1) and the phrased New England squares of
today (Tony's definition 3), whether the latter have the word "Quadrille" in
their titles or not.
Where today's dancers would to courtesy turns, or replace them with twirls and other
embellishments, 19th-century dance manuals prescribe a simple turn by the left hand. The
word "swing" was used to describe a two-hand turn, or sometimes other figures
such as a right-hand or left-hand turn or a circle, but certainly not something done in
the closed ballroom-like position we generally use for swings today. Also, if I
understand correctly, where we generally use a simple walking step for most square dance
figures other than "balance" and "swing", dancers in the early 19th
century were taught more elaborate footwork. (My impression is that later in 19th
century, the fancy footwork became less common, though some dancing masters may have
objected to that trend. However, I haven't looked carefully through available books
of the period to check the trends in what people were writing, much less do I know how
well what appeared in the books of any decade corresponded to what dancers were actually
doing.)
John lists a number of dances with "Quadrille" in their titles and writes of
them:
But they are all just square dances. None of them
bear any
resemblance to an actual Quadrille. A few like Western Quadrille are based
on one figure of an actual Quadrille, but with modern styling.
It’s a nice word and sounds good in a dance title. :-)
Those remarks apply at least as much to my own "Wardwell Quadrille" series as to
any of the other dances on John's list. I used the word "Quadrille" in the
titles simply because I thought it sounded good in combination with "Wardwell"
("Wardwell Hall" being the former name of the church social hall used by the
BACDS San Francisco contra dance series). I didn't at all imagine the dances being
done in an especially elegaaahnt style, and my preferred music would be old-time reels,
not the 6/8 tunes of Tony's definition 4 of "quadrille" nor the sort of
orchestral music used for those Viennese "quadrilles" that I referenced in an
earlier message.
--Jim
On Feb 23, 2020, at 3:24 AM, John Sweeney via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Calling something a Quadrille doesn't necessarily make it a Quadrille.
To me the King's Quadrille is just a modern American square dance.
It doesn't have the styling or the moves or the length/complexity of a
Quadrille (e.g. I don't believe that courtesy turns existed in the period
when Quadrilles were danced).
The only commonality is that it is done by four couples in a Square.
On checking, I find that I have the following in my deck:
Festival Quadrille
The Hawk Quadrille
Buffalo Quadrille
Camille's Quadrille
Queen's Quadrille (same as King's but the moves are straight across instead
of to the right) - also known as "The Quiet Square"
Easy Does it Quadrille
Knave's Quadrille
Karen's Quadrille
Western Quadrille
Wardwell Quadrille
Colonial's Quadrille
Farmer's Quadrille
Hmm... I hadn't realised that there were so many!
But they are all just square dances. None of them bear any
resemblance to an actual Quadrille. A few like Western Quadrille are based
on one figure of an actual Quadrille, but with modern styling.
It’s a nice word and sounds good in a dance title. :-)
Happy dancing,
John
<snip>