Howdy,
For those of you who know me (hi Alan!), I'm sure it's no surprise that
I'm ignoring the standard advice to lurk on a list for a while, so I
figured I should introduce myself:
I'm a mid-40s cisgendered heterosexual white male, deaf with a cochlear
implant (hearing-impaired my whole life). I've been contra dancing about
a quarter-century, folk/square dancing a bit longer. These days I mostly
think of myself as a contra dancer; square dancing is not much fun with
my current level of hearing, and IFD (international folk dancing) is
TOCOTOX [1] for this post.
[1] Too COmplicated TO eXplain
I lost my job in October and am taking something of a sabbatical. One
thing I'm doing during this time is starting to write and call contra
dances, which is how I landed here. I'm also starting to investigate
calling squares -- talking ought to be easier than listening. ;-)
Although I'm not genderqueer, I do what I call "performance genderfuck",
playing with people's (and society's) expectations for "appropriate
gender behavior". That includes gender-swapping at dances (often wearing
a skirt); I can't remember when I started, but at least two decades ago.
I also sometimes wear skirts at science fiction conventions. If you hunt
down my other writing, you'll see a fair amount of "zie/zir"
(gender-neutral pronouns), and outside discussion of gender, I rarely
reveal my gender online.
Now I'll tie this back somewhat to the current discussion:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013, Greg McKenzie wrote:
I have no problem dancing the ladies part once or twice in an
evening,...but I would not drive two hours to do that all night. I
see that hint of "sexual tension" in the room at a dance as a core
part of what makes it fun. The energy of opposite tantric polarities
in close proximity is part of what drives the energy level at a dance.
I see it as an essential component. Most folks do social dancing, at
least in part, to interact with the opposite gender. We enjoy and
celebrate dancing with all kinds of folks, but I am hesitant about
changing the terminology to the extent that gender choice is not an
option.
Actually, although I agree that the "sexual tension" is a large part of
why I enjoy contra, I have driven an hour [2] to go to a gender-free
contra where I had no expectation of dancing with a bi/heterosexual
person of the opposite gender. And I'm going to the Queer Contra Dance
Camp in April [3], mostly because I want to meet a man I've known online
for a decade -- but of course I expect to have a lot of fun otherwise.
[2] I find that for me an hour of driving is about as exhausting as 2-3
hours for most people -- I rarely go anywhere more than a half-hour away
[3]
http://www.lcfd.org/sf/DanceCamp/wcamp.html
I really don't get "gender choice is not an option". As I said in
another post, I agree that alternative gender terms are probably not
going to gain widespread acceptance outside the gender-free dance
community. But I do think it's a good idea for the dance community and
the caller community to come to agreement about the "best" terms for
gender-free calling.
As this quote illustrates, I think I'm not particularly an outlier:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013, tavi merrill wrote:
A friend of mine, a male in his 60s, describes his initial discomfort
at same-gender dance floor encounters giving way to an appreciation
for the inclusivity of the community. He still prefers to partner
heteronormatively, but he recognizes the value of making the dance
community as inclusive as it is, and on occasion actively supports
that value by partnering same-gender. I think that position describes
where a lot of dancers are. Whatever a person's experience of the
folkdance meta-community is, i believe we can agree that one thing
which sets it apart from other social spheres is its inclusivity.
However, I'll note that as with science fiction fandom, we are almost
certainly a lot less inclusive than we like to think (on several axes).
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
"I used to have a .sig but I found it impossible to please everyone..." --SFJ