On Feb 23, 2014, at 7:23 PM, Bob Isaacs wrote:
Jack:
Did you get the dance correctly? What was sent does not progress,
and as I read it the A2 swing is with partner, not neighbor. ...
The sequence Jack had posted (on behalf of Dean Snipes) was
RH Star
N Alle R
Gent pass L, 1/2 hey
N Sw
Gents Alle L 1 1/2
P Sw
Ladies chain
LH Star
I think I see a source of mis-communication. Notice the line
Gent pass L, 1/2 hey
at the start of A2. I believe Bob interpreted this as
Gents pass by L shoulder [to face partner]
Then all dance 1/2 hey (PR, WL, NR, ML) [to meet partner
on M's original side* of the dance]
But I think that what Jack (and Dean) meant was
Gents start a "half" hey [really 3/8] by passing L shoulder
(ML, PR, WL) [to meet neighbor again, all opposite
original sides]
I'm not saying this to chastise Jack (or Dean, if Jack was quoting
Dean verbatim) for poor or ambiguous notation. Nor do I mean to
accuse Bob of careless reading. I just want to clear up a point of
confusion, and also to point out how easy it is for something that
seems perfectly clear to a writer (or speaker) to seem ambiguous--
or, worse, to seem perfectly clear but with a different meaning--
to a reader (or listener). I'll add that it was certainly better
for Bob to have studied Jack's message and asked
Did you get the dance correctly? ...
than for him to have simply copied the sequence onto a card, taught
it at a dance without having checked it, come across the same point
of ambiguity, and then had to sort out the resulting confusion on
the spot.
[*Note: By "on M's original side", I mean that each man is on the
same side as he was at the start of A1, and not, say, that each
man is on the same side as he was a the start of the (PR, WL,
NR, ML) sequence.]
--Jim