21 Feb
2014
21 Feb
'14
3:15 p.m.
Could you explain what it means to "vote people up?"
It sounds like one would have to be "voted up" to be able to comment.
I'm not sure I would call any of the discussions I've read flooded.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Lindsay Morris <lindsay(a)tsmworks.com>wrote;wrote:
Today its 29 hate-the-idea, 7 like-it, 7 not sure.
I'll let it go.
Really, all I wanted was a way we could vote people up, so we could give
more weight to the opinions of the especially respected folks here (and
filter the email flood down to just those people).
I wonder if there's any other way to do that?
--------------------
Lindsay Morris
CEO, TSMworks
Tel. 1-859-539-9900
lindsay(a)tsmworks.com
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Aahz Maruch <aahz(a)pobox.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014, John W Gintell wrote:
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
A potential solution would be to replace it with a Google Group.
People can choose to receive messages via email (digest or not) or
view it as a group, or both. An advantage is that if you want to
revisit a discussion it is easier.
You can revisit discussions here using the archives. And even before the
Snowden revelations, I already avoided Google as much as possible.
Honestly, it sounds like solutions in search of a problem.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers