I personally plan to start teaching this modification as an option for a
swing in my beginner's lesson. I'm just curious as to whether there's a way
one can quickly signal that you'd like to do this modified swing instead of
the traditional ballroom... Like, if you want to ricochet through a Hey for
Four, you put your hands up in front of you; if you want to twirl/be
twirled, you raise your joined hands (and the other person can decide
whether to oblige or not). Is there a quick signal that allows one to
quickly get into this modified swing without needing a verbal discussion
about it?
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 10:17 Becky Liddle via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
In the discussion about some men being uncomfortable
doing ballroom dance
hold swing with other men, the modified ballroom hold (hand above elbow of
partner instead of on robin’s shoulder) was mentioned.
In this discussion, much has been said about men who don’t want to do
ballroom hold with other men, but what nobody has mentioned yet is the
scads of women (both straight and queer) who have long been uncomfortable
dancing ballroom swing with men (or often just with particular men). *I
am intrigued by this modified ballroom swing idea because it might solve
many problems at once*.
I have two simultaneous (and conflicting) emotional responses to men
uncomfortable swinging with other men:
The ungenerous one is: "As a lesbian I had to get over my discomfort
swinging with you in order to participate in the joy of contra. If I can do
it, you can do it." But more importantly (and more generously): *We’d
like everyone to be as comfortable at contra dances as is reasonably
feasible*. To that end, I am very interested in this idea of the modified
ballroom hold. It might solve MANY different problems. Here are a few that
come to mind:
1. The enforced intimacy problem: this is not just a problem with straight
men being uncomfortable swinging with other men. There is a lot of forced
intimacy in the ballroom hold. Maybe that intimacy is not the best thing to
force on *anyone*?. Modified ballroom swing would help with the problem
of not wanting enforced closeness/intimacy with others for all kinds of
reasons: keeping distance from the lecherous dancer who uses the ballroom
hold as an excuse for unwanted intimacy; but also simply to provide a bit
of space for folks who simply aren’t comfortable being that close to
ANYBODY. I recently struck up a conversation with a new dancer who was
leaving early (because we need to know why we’re losing potential dancers)
and she said “It just feels too intimate.” She didn’t say too intimate
swinging with men or with women. Just “too intimate” and I got the definite
feeling that it was the enforced close hold (with *everyone*) that was
difficult for her. I wonder if we would have lost her if we used the
modified ballroom swing (hand above elbow instead of on shoulder).
2. There are other difficulties with the ballroom hold: sometimes there is
simply not enough room: short arms or large girth can make it difficult to
reach the back of the shoulder of the other partner at times, and this
leaves the Lark in the uncomfortable/dangerous position of “where do I put
my hand now?” While trying to avoid the “accidental side boob graze” issue.
3. Speaking of which, is nobody else out there having trouble with this
“side boob graze” problem with the ballroom hold? I’m a lesbian who dances
the Lark role because of knee and hip issues. At least once/evening when
moving into or out of the ballroom hold I accidentally graze the side of my
partner’s breast. If I were straight I wouldn’t worry about it. But as a
lesbian my mind always leaps to “what if she thinks I did that on purpose?” *Do
straight men not also have this problem?? Why is nobody talking about
this??* If the robin is female-presenting, the back of the robin’s
shoulder is dangerously close to the side of her breast. Which means (a)
it’s easy for a sleaze to cop a feel and pass it off as an accident, and
(b) it’s easy for a lesbian or straight man to truly accidentally graze and
then worry that they’ll be *perceived *as a sleaze. The elbow hold would
solve both of these problems.
4. The robin clamping down their arm problem: Larks, have you ever danced
with a robin who clamps down their arm on your wrist during the swing?
Again, elbow hold would solve this.
5. The problem of robins dancing backwards when swinging: I have never
danced the modified ballroom hold, but I’d like to know from folks who do:
does it solve the problem of many robins feeling like they need to dance
backwards when swinging? On the occasions when I do dance robin (usually
because I’m pairing with a newbie who is dancing lark) I often find myself
skittering backwards in the swing, instead of both of us walking/dancing
forward. I’m not experienced enough as a robin to fully understand this
phenomenon, but I think it has to do with the closeness and rigidity of
some Larks’ hold in the ballroom swing. Question for folks who have used
the elbow hold: does this hold solve this problem and allow the robin to
dance forward instead of backward in the swing?
I am particularly interested in this issue because I am about to move from
Toronto (where the ballroom hold is firmly established) to an island off
the coast of Vancouver (Bowen Island) where, if I want to continue to
dance, I will have to start my own contra dance. This conversation has made
me wonder whether I should start that group with the modified ballroom hold
to solve many of these problems. *I’d love to hear from others who have
used this swing about the pros and cons *(if any) and any other advice
you’d have for someone starting a dance using this swing hold.
Thanks!!
Becky Liddle
(Note: my email is changing from beckyliddle(a)bell.net to
becky.liddle(a)icloud.com )
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net