21 Jun
2013
21 Jun
'13
9:10 p.m.
Hi Jim?
Yeah. That's originally what I was aiming for; I've danced contra dances
where they are used as a down-the-hall turnaroynd. The Loop Di Doo differs
in that instead of a turnaround move, it leads into a swing as a
continuation of the move. Actually, if Forward Six changed hands the gent
lifted, it would be the same since a swing follows.
I do believe that's Jack Mitchell in that video.
On Jun 20, 2013 11:14 PM, "James Saxe" <jim.saxe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ron,
I think your "Loop Di Doo" figure is a lot like something that
occurs in some versions of the traditional (not modern western)
square dance "Forward Six" (a/k/a "Right Hand High, Left Hand Low"
or "Right Lady Over, Left Lady Under" ...). See for example these
videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=vaDbKuJNqkM<http://www.youtube.com/watc…
(watch the action as 2:45)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=ltQg0o_p0SU<http://www.youtube.com/watc…
(watch at 1:12)
It's not exactly the same, since in the square dance figure it's
the left hand lady (already holding he partner's hand) who ducks
under the arch, while the right hand lady arches (rather than
diving) to get to her lonesome gent.
--Jim
On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:20 PM, Ron T Blechner wrote:
I wrote a dance that, when I finished it, I realized the A was the
same as 3-33,33:
http://contradances.tumblr.**com/post/10510984149/ants-**marching<http:/…
It's gone over well, and has an easier finish. There's one move to
teach very carefully. (I uh ... sorta created a variation of a
left-hand-high-right-hand-low that goes into a swing ... called a Loop
Di Doo). It's been picked up by a few other callers, so, I know it's
not totally awful.
in dance,
Ron T Blechner
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Bree Kalb <bree(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
______________________________**_________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
I agree with Michael. Especially in the case of a
classic.
-----Original Message-----
______________________________**_________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
From: Michael Barraclough
<michael@michaelbarraclough.**com<michael@michaelbarraclough.com>
>
Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
There are thousands of contras. If one doesn't work, why not try
another one instead of altering that one?
Michael Barraclough
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:16 -0700, Dave C wrote:
Instead of the Ladies Dosido 1.5 at the end to progress, just have the
> Ladies AL 1 1/2 in the center, with RH ready for the next neighbor. Some
> in the caller community have dubbed this version of the dance 3-33-34.
>
> Dave Colestock
> New Cumberland, PA
>
>
> --- On Thu, 6/20/13, Kalia Kliban <kalia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
> From: Kalia Kliban <kalia(a)sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classis aagain 3-33-33
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013, 2:10 PM
>
> I've had pretty good luck with it, possibly because I have the women
> ID the next neighbor early on. They know which face to look for. After
> that, they get a better feel for the area to aim for to find the new
> neighbor. A couple of seriously disoriented dancers can really play havoc
> with this dance though. It's brittle.
>
> Kalia
>
> On 6/20/2013 11:02 AM, Rickey Holt wrote:
>
>> 3-33-33 lovers and callers - I have been calling this great dance
>> recently
>> and noticed that dancers of various experience levels in several
>> venues have
>> had trouble with the transition in the B2 from the Ladies Do-si-do 1
>> 1/2 to
>> the balance with the next neighbor that starts the dance. They have
>> trouble
>> finding that next neighbor, even after several times through, and with
>> translating the momentum of crossing the set to that of up and down
>> the line
>> of the first part of the dance. I tried substituting an allemande
>> right 1
>> 1/2 for the do-si-do 1 1/2 of the original with little effect. What
>> about a
>> ladies allemande right about 1 1/2 to a next neighbor allemande left
>> and
>> then starting the dance again with a balance by the right with that
>> neighbor? Other solutions? Have you or your dancers noticed the
>> problem
>> that I have seen. As always, thanks for your thoughts.
>>
>> Rickey Holt
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
> ______________________________**_________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
>
______________________________**_________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
Bree Kalb, LCSW
301 W. Weaver St.
Carrboro, NC 27510
919-932-6262 ext 216
http://www.**thewellnessalliance.com/**BreeKalb.html<http://www.thewelln…
Regarding the Use of Email -- Please Note: Although I use a firewall and
my
computer is password protected, my emails are not encrypted. Therefore, I
cannot guarantee confidentiality of email communication. If you choose to
communicate confidential information with me via email, I will assume
that
you have made an informed decision and I will view it as your agreement
to
take the risk that email may be intercepted. Please be aware that email
is
never an appropriate vehicle for emergency communication. If you are
canceling an appointment less than 48 hours in advance, please
also leave me a voice mail message at my office.
______________________________**_________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…