13 Apr
2013
13 Apr
'13
5:34 a.m.
I just consider this "indifferent" to be progressed improper.
Progressed improper is just reverse progression indecent.
-Chris Page
San Diego
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Laur <lcpgr(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Aahz
Indifferent - set up as improper formation, then have neighbors trade places (ladies on
the left)
Indecent - set up proper, then have 2's trade places
~
________________________________
From: Aahz Maruch <aahz(a)pobox.com>
To: Laur <lcpgr(a)yahoo.com>om>; Caller's discussion list
<callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Callers] formation indifferent/ indecent
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013, Laur wrote:
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
I don't see a difference between the the indecent and the indifferent
other than in one we ask the ones to be proper and the two's trade
places and in the other (indifferent) we ask the dancers to from
improper then change places with their neighbor.
Tom Hinds, are you around for a quick answer?
Could you provide a bit more context? I've got no clue what you're
talking about.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html