May I respectfully disagree with Michael, Bree and Joyce? And offer an analogy? Every
five or six years I tell the Odyssey to the students at my school, one book per week, over
the course of the school year. I do make a few alterations and omissions befitting my
audience. And of course I could choose a different story. But teachers, parents and
students seem to cherish this classic story--and deservedly so, I think! My minor
alterations allow me to pass on a great classic to my audience. Similarly, callers who
cherish a classic dance, and feel an alteration will allow them to present it an audience,
should be allowed to do so, in my opinion. Of course the authors of the dances may feel
differently about this!
Looking at contra history, haven't classic dances much older than 3-33-33 evolved in
the past century or two, and aren't they called and danced regularly today with those
alterations?
Richard
On Jun 20, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Joyce Miller wrote:
Exactly. And if it can't be taught effectively to
a certain group, choose another dance.
On Jun 20, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Bree Kalb <bree(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
I agree with Michael. Especially in the case of a
classic.
-----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Barraclough <michael(a)michaelbarraclough.com>
> Sent: Jun 20, 2013 5:25 PM
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Tampering with a classic again 3-33-33
>
> There are thousands of contras. If one doesn't work, why not try
> another one instead of altering that one?
>
> Michael Barraclough
>
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers