Hey John,
If the N word was also a move that somehow wasn't connected to the slur,
you wouldn't dare argue that it's different or that you should get to call
it, so drop the argument please. Just because you don't think I should be
offended about the word and how it reflects on my heritage doesn't mean you
get to dictate whether I actually am. I would ask you not to decide for
others how they ought to experience and respect their racial identity,
thanks.
Isaac
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019, 5:10 AM John Sweeney via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
  Since the topic has been re-opened…
 First, please may I clear up a couple of points of confusion.
 The original version of the Gypsy dance move did not involve eyes.  The
 first known mention of eyes is in America in 1983.  Dancers outside the
 modern contra genre do not always lock eyes.  Indeed, in 1911 Cecil Sharp
 defined two moves, the Whole-Gip Facing Centre and the Whole-Gip Facing
 Outward, the second of which definitely didn’t involve eye contact!
 English is a rich and varied language wherein many words have multiple,
 different meanings. This is one of them! In this context the word Gip or
 Gypsy is a historical dance term. It has nothing to do with the people
 known as gypsies.
 Roma and gypsy are not synonymous.  One of the definitions of gypsy is
 just “traveller”.  Dance Gypsy just means a dancer who travels.
 For lots more background on the Gypsy move please see
 
http://contrafusion.co.uk/Gypsy.html.
 = = = = = = = = = = =
 However, if you insist on linking the two together, the move and the
 person, then please read on.
 I am sorry, but I do not believe that the word “gypsy” is intrinsically a
 racial/ethnic slur.  To be a slur it would have to be used in a way that
 the context and tone make it a slur.  If I call someone a “stupid gypsy” in
 a nasty tone of voice then it would be a slur.  But, of course, I could
 say, “stupid blonde”, “stupid Irishman” or “stupid child” in a nasty tone.
 None of these make the individual words “blonde”, “Irishman” or “child”
 into slurs.  Context and tone are crucial in making an ordinary word into a
 slur.  In the context of a dance there is no slur intended, and none should
 be inferred.
 If it was intrinsically a slur then would these, and countless other,
 organisations use it in their names or descriptions?
 Gypsy Council USA 
https://twitter.com/gypsy_usa
 The National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups
 
http://www.nationalgypsytravellerfederation.org/
 Friends Families and Travellers 
https://www.gypsy-traveller.org/
 The Pope started his address to the Pilgrimage of Gypsies with, “Dear
 gypsy friends”.
https://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/speeches/2015/october/documents/…
 I don’t believe that he intended it as a slur!
  I have been teaching dance for nearly 50 years, using the words “Half
 Gyp”, “Whole Gyp” and “Gypsy” and of the thousands of people I have taught,
 not a single one has ever suggested that it might be a slur in that context.
 I am Irish and have cousins who call themselves gypsies and who would be
 most upset at the suggestion that the word is intrinsically a slur.
 Rather than remove the word from our vocabulary, surely we should instead
 be trying to make the word positive.  Fight back against those who use
 words nastily and reclaim our language.
 When all the gypsy organisations in the world declare that it is a slur
 and change their names then I might start to believe it, but until then
 please consider just explaining to anyone who asks (IF anyone ever asks)
 that the dance move is a completely different use of the word, and because
 of its context cannot possibly be a slur.
             Happy dancing,
                    John
 John Sweeney, Dancer, England   john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 & 07802
 940 574
 
http://contrafusion.co.uk/KentCeilidhs.html for Live Music
 Ceilidhs
 
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
 
http://www.modernjive.com for Modern Jive DVDs
 _______________________________________________
 List Name:  Callers mailing list
 List Address:  Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
 Archives:  
https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/