1 May
2010
1 May
'10
11:55 a.m.
Great discussion about walk-throughs. In particular I like the 'mix
it up' approach. Not too long ago I got chewed out by one person for
doing two walk-throughs for several contras at Glen Echo on a
Friday. Do we like to make up rules or what?
I'd like to throw in an idea that I think others may have touched
on. I like to use the square dance figure, teacup chain for groups
that haven't danced it. I usually walk it through twice for the head
ladies and let them do it by themselves a third time. Ditto for the
side ladies. Then I walk it through for all four ladies once or
twice. The total number of times the figure is walked through is 8
but the figure is only 32 beats long. Add to this the instructions
to the men and some of the rules for everyone, we have a great deal
of instruction. Here's the catch: the teacup chain always gets the
most applause from the crowd. It's the big thrill of the evening.
What I've learned is that for some dances there's a pay off. My goal
is to figure out what dances will pay off the most for each group.
In the last year or so, I've noticed that what really turns on one
group will bore or turn off another. I don't have a crystal ball yet
and can't figure out why this is-still lots to learn.
Tom
On May 1, 2010, at 12:00 PM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
Send Callers mailing list submissions to
callers(a)sharedweight.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Walk-throughs (Rich Goss)
2. Re: Walk-throughs (Martha Edwards)
3. Re: Walk-throughs (Katy Heine)
4. Re: Walk-throughs (JohnFreem(a)aol.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:02:46 -0700
From: Rich Goss <richgoss(a)comcast.net>
To: Shared Weight <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Walk-throughs
Message-ID: <C8008576.8DA5%richgoss(a)comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
On 4/30/10 11:29 AM, "Bob Isaacs" <isaacsbob(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Bob Isaacs wrote:
> Just curious - what are the dancer
expectations where you call?
Often I find that is just depends on the dance. Our Portland
Saturday
dances tend to have a fair number of beginners, somewhere around
20-30
percent (we get between 100-150 total) If I observe that folks
seemed to
get it the first time, back it up and go. If it's a dance with a
tricky
move, second walkthrough. If I've had to demo a move in the first
walkthrough, definitely a second with the feel of the flow. I
always try
to
throw in a no-walkthrough sometime during the evening, with familiar moves.
Chris Weiler wrote:
"I subscribe to the theory that if I need more than one walk thru,
then
I'm calling a dance that is too difficult for the crowd. The main
reason
that I might run a second walk thru is if there is a clump of
beginners
and I need to get them progressed to new couples who can help
them out. "
Bob Isaacs wrote:
Just curious - what are the dancer expectations where you call?
Often I find that is just depends on the dance. Our Portland Saturday
dances tend to have a fair number of beginners, somewhere around 20-30
percent (we get between 100-150 total) If I observe that folks
seemed to
get it the first time, back it up and go. If it's a dance with a
tricky
move, second walkthrough. If I've had to demo a move in the first
walkthrough, definitely a second with the feel of the flow. I
always try to
throw in a no-walkthrough sometime during the evening, with
familiar moves.
Rich
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:26:33 -0500
From: Martha Edwards <meedwards(a)westendweb.com>
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Walk-throughs
Message-ID:
<z2g7d8d864a1004301426m67c8b0c3wdadfb9ea70806b7c(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I've had East coast callers tell me in no uncertain terms that if
you have
to walk it through more than once you'd better figure out a better
way to
call or choose simpler dances.
But we're used to two out here in the Heartland, so we have all
kinds of
reasons why it's better. Number one is that the two walkthroughs have
different functions - the first one to explain the moves, the
second to show
what you have to do when you do them at speed.
The number two reason is that the experienced dancers are talking
during the
first walkthrough, knowing that another one is coming...
Hmmm....
M
E
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rich Goss <richgoss(a)comcast.net>
wrote:
On 4/30/10 11:29 AM, "Bob Isaacs" <isaacsbob(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
Bob Isaacs wrote:
> Just curious - what are the dancer
expectations where you call?
Often I find that is just depends on the dance. Our Portland
Saturday
dances tend to have a fair number of beginners, somewhere around
20-30
percent (we get between 100-150 total) If I observe that folks
seemed to
get it the first time, back it up and go. If it's a dance with a
tricky
move, second walkthrough. If I've had to demo a move in the first
walkthrough, definitely a second with the feel of the flow. I
always try
to
throw in a no-walkthrough sometime during the evening, with
familiar moves.
Rich
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
--
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 07:23:16 -0400
From: "Katy Heine" <kheine(a)twcny.rr.com>
To: "'Caller's discussion list'" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Walk-throughs
Message-ID: <0F40BEA5136F43BBA70CE3BE69348CC9@stewart>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Interesting discussion. Here in central New York, I don't think the
dancers
have a clear expectation about the number of times a dance should
be walked
through (although generally there's a preference for single walk-
throughs,
and little tolerance for more than two). The approach that I've
decided to
take is to mix it up: use one walk-through for simpler dances and
two when a
dance is particularly complex ... or when the dance is new to me,
or when I
feel I haven't done the best job teaching it the first time. So far
no one
has complained....
Katy Heine
-----Original Message-----
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net
[mailto:callers-bounces@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Martha Edwards
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 5:27 PM
To: Caller's discussion list
Subject: Re: [Callers] Walk-throughs
I've had East coast callers tell me in no uncertain terms that if
you have
to walk it through more than once you'd better figure out a better
way to
call or choose simpler dances.
But we're used to two out here in the Heartland, so we have all
kinds of
reasons why it's better. Number one is that the two walkthroughs have
different functions - the first one to explain the moves, the
second to show
what you have to do when you do them at speed.
The number two reason is that the experienced dancers are talking
during the
first walkthrough, knowing that another one is coming...
Hmmm....
M
E
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rich Goss <richgoss(a)comcast.net>
wrote:
Chris Weiler wrote:
"I subscribe to the theory that if I need more than one walk
thru, then
I'm calling a dance that is too difficult for the crowd. The
main reason
that I might run a second walk thru is if there is a clump of
beginners
and I need to get them progressed to new couples who can help
them out.
"
On 4/30/10 11:29 AM, "Bob Isaacs" <isaacsbob(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Chris Weiler wrote:
>
>
> "I subscribe to the theory that if I need more than one walk
> thru, then
> I'm calling a dance that is too difficult for the crowd. The main
reason
that I
might run a second walk thru is if there is a clump of
beginners
and I need to get them progressed to new couples who can help
them out.
"
Rich
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
--
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 07:37:47 EDT
From: JohnFreem(a)aol.com
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: Re: [Callers] Walk-throughs
Message-ID: <771.741827bc.390d6c8b(a)aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Good morning!
I just returned from watching Ann Arbor Morris brave a torrential
downpour
to welcome the spring in. We were all soaked clear through
to...well, I'll
leave that to your imagination.
Anyway, since I usually work with mixed crowds, I tend to favor two or
three walkthroughs. I think that it give the newbies a few
opportunities to
learn how the progression works, to learn that it's "places, not
faces" that
often determines who you will be dancing with, and to rein the
center set crowd
in a bit so we are on the same page as we begin. I also may switch
to a
proper dance if the "experienced dancers" cross over before the
sets have
sorted themselves out. I discourage "flourishes" during the
walkthroughs. They do
nothing to enhance the teaching, and often really confuse the
beginners. I
don't mind them later...as long as they don't interfere with the
enjoyment
of others.
And yes, I AM the chief of the Dance Police. :-)
John B. Freeman, President
SFTPOCTJ
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
End of Callers Digest, Vol 69, Issue 1
**************************************