In the "Sidelines" thread Jill wrote:
> I think everyone would agree that callers and organizers can work together
> to influence the behavior of the dancers and to set the tone for a fun and
> inclusive evening of dancing. I agree with Greg:
>
> "If anyone wants to discuss the ways callers...and others can lead, I would
> love to have such a thread."
>
I'm game. This is a core purpose of what, I think, callers do.
Jill also wrote:
> Although we might not all agree on what is acceptable dancer behavior, do
> you have more ideas for callers and organizers, perhaps a list of what has
> worked for you to make your dances more inclusive and friendly to all.
>
I think we probably *can *agree on what many *desirable *behaviors or
qualities are: Graciousness, civility, kindness, respect, gentleness,
support, confidence, etc. I suggest we focus on how to encourage what is
desirable rather than on trying to extinguish undesirable behaviors.
Kalia wrote, in reference to her newcomer orientation:
> ... I make a point of demonstrating how to ask someone to dance. A lot of
> new dancers may not have done this since high school or earlier, and it's a
> very different ball of worms at a contra dance. It can be super simple
> (offer a hand, raise the eyebrows) or you can say "would you like to
> dance?" But it doesn't have to be a big deal. That can take some
> learning, so I like to give folks a head start on that very important
> process.
>
Great point! I have seen George Marshall do this and I'm going to include
it in my own orientation sessions. Thank you for reminding me of this idea.
Maia wrote:
> "I have a challenge for you: at least once tonight, dance with someone you
> don't know; and at least once tonight, dance with someone of a different
> experience level than yourself." Something along those lines.
>
This is also very good. Here is how I do it. I try to avoid ever telling
the regulars how to behave...directly. Instead I direct my comments to the
first-timers and speak *on behalf of the regulars while assuming their full
support. *The fact is that the first-timers have no way to identify people
of a "different experience level" so any reference to that is, by
implication, directed at the regulars.
At the start of the dance evening I say: "If you are new to this kind of
dancing please find someone who has danced contras at least one night, and
form two contra dance lines."
This is a strongly implied cue to the regulars--who already know exactly
who the newcomers are--to take a leadership role and to partner with
first-timers. (Note that I do NOT tell them how to form lines. I do NOT
say "...with the lady on the right, facing the stage" or "please join at
the bottom of the line" etc. The regulars know all of this. To include
any such information would imply that I expect, at least, *some *of the
first-timers to be partnered with other first-timers. I want to imply that
*all *of the first-timers will be partnered with regulars. This is what I
mean by assuming the full support of the regulars.)
As callers we are more effective when we use our words very carefully and
judiciously. At an open, public social event eliminating excess verbiage
is always helpful in holding the attention of the hall. Implied messages
are very powerful. You can have much more influence with what you do NOT
say than with what you do say. More on this later.
- Greg McKenzie (who, having a degree in speech communication sometimes
gets a bit wonkish about it.)
I have a vague recollection that recently a group at a dance camp wrote a 4x4 (double contra, mescalonza) called something like "Warm up". If true, would someone send me a copy?
thanks,
Lynn
Thank you to everyone who has posted their ideas about how to make sure everyone is getting a chance to dance. This will be very helpful. I think it was important to have the discussions about gender balance, booking ahead, equal opportunity and whose responsibility is it to facilitate it, can we really affect people's behavior, etc. I think everyone would agree that callers and organizers can work together to influence the behavior of the dancers and to set the tone for a fun and inclusive evening of dancing. I agree with Greg:
"If anyone wants to discuss the ways callers...and others can lead, I would
love to have such a thread."
Although we might not all agree on what is acceptable dancer behavior, do you have more ideas for callers and organizers, perhaps a list of what has worked for you to make your dances more inclusive and friendly to all.
Thanks again,
Jill
I've had some success with Mike Richardson's dance "Another Jig Will Do."
It's not a waltz, but dances as one. Musically, it fits a two-part slip-jig
such as "The Snowy Path" or two parts of the three-part "The Butterfly."
See http://www.quiteapair.us/calling/acdol/dance/acd_10.html for details of
the figure.
I can generally find a waltz rhythm within the 9/8 signature, but I've seen
some dancers struggle with this, so check the tune with the band
beforehand. These same dancers were upset with me for asking them to use a
waltz step during a contra, so it might not have been the tune.
--Jerome
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:00 AM, <callers-request(a)sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Re: Waltz contras - does anyone have any in their box?
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
>
> Alan Winston asked:
>
Slip-jgs are usually played with DAH-du-dum DAH-du-dum DAH-dum-dum
> (nine beats in a measure, with emphasis on the first beat of each triplet).
> Are you taking three (ONE-two-three) waltz steps per measure, or one
> (ONE...TWO...THREE) waltz step per measure?
>
Alan, three waltz steps per measure. When I danced in Louisville, the
Monday Night Band often used The Butterfly or The Snowy Path for the waltz,
and it took me a while to realize that these were not, in fact, waltzes.
And as I suggest, not all slip jigs can be felt as a waltz, as I've
painfully discovered.
The Butterfly in particular is very hypnotic as a (turning) waltz, since
the phrases seem to drive on and on rather than regathering as in most
waltzes.
But perhaps this is a regional taste.
When I discovered "Another Jig Will Do," and saw it was written for a
two-part slip jig, I asked for "The Snowy Path." I assumed people would
waltz, and in fact they did, in Louisville. Elsewhere, I've found myself
trying to explain why I'm asking them to waltz.
--Jerome
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
Or you could try to get rid of the gender disparity. For example, if you
don't have enough men then offer free entry to anyone who brings a new
man to a dance.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Many contra events have a couple waltz during intermission or at the
last dance. BUT does anyone ever due a contra (duple or triple minor) in
waltz time?
Hanny
Dave's post about booking ahead and people's "responsibilities" to dance
one role or the other made me think: DO people (read: experienced dancers
who are capable of switching) have a responsibility to dance a particular
role if there's a gender disparity? There's something to be said for
reminding people, "not all couples need to be male/female!" But the idea
that anyone is obligated to dance lead or follow, or to dance with same or
opposite sex, makes me uncomfortable. My home dance regularly has more men
than women (crazy!) but my preferred role is lead; does this mean I'm
obligated to dance follow/dance with men (it happens that many of the men
don't follow, and anyway, the height difference makes it tricky), rather
than dancing with women? Is there a difference in obligating someone to
dance their gender-typical role and their gender-atypical role? How much
responsibility do experience dancers have for evening out a gender
imbalance? (And to what extent is it an okay thing to assume that a gender
imbalance *needs* evening out?)
Cheers,
Maia
Another one for Three-Facing-Three is Walpole Cottage by Pat Shaw - has
a C part as well so time to include some stars and heys. That one is a
Sicilian Circle so you get to dance with lots of trios.
I believe Erik Hoffman did a version he called Walpole Dollhouse.
= = = = = = = =
The same move is in:
Strip the Willow Square
Square (32 or 48 bars Jigs)
A1: Heads gallop across (men b-to-b) and back (ladies b-to-b)
A2: Sides gallop across (men b-to-b) and back (ladies b-to-b)
B1/2: Head Men Strip the Willow: Men Allemande* Right 3/4; Allemande L
the R-hand Lady; Men Allemande R 3/4; Allemande L the opposite Lady; Men
Allemande R 3/4; Allemande L the L-hand Lady; Men Allemande R 3/4;
Partner Allemande L
C1: Circle L, Circle R
C2: Partner Balance & Swing
Repeat for side men, then head ladies, then side ladies, then all the
man at once, then all the ladies at once (stars rather than allemandes).
= = = = = = = =
Or if you like turning contra corners then you can just do it as a Strip
the Willow:
Orcadian (or Shetland) Strip the Willow
Longways; Proper (slip jig)
A1: Top couple R hand turn (elbows linked) 1 1/2 and Strip the
Willow to the bottom
B1: Next couple start
Repeat until too tired to stand.
When you reach the bottom swing and then join the lines.
Everyone: Move up after you have turned the active couple.
= = = = = = = =
Or do some Big Set and throw in a Shoo Fly Swing: One couple starts a
Ladies' Strip the Willow, each Lady joins in as soon as she can so all
the Men are circling in the middle following their Ladies around the
set; then the Men Strip the Willow - see
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KKvElR4ZaA
= = = = = = = =
Or go back in time and do Fandango (Apted 1774) with two hand turns
rather than allemandes.
= = = = = = = =
There are lots more... :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Years ago I remember dancing a dance that had a full contra corners
in it. The active dancers had four corners to turn instead of two.
I think the caller called the move sharp corners. Does anyone have
any of these dances they could share? I'm particularly interested
in dances with this move that have been written in the last 40 years
or so.
Tom