Actually: " Circle 3/4 & pass through as ANY move of a dance" I think.
Yes, lots of excellent callers stress that circle 3/4 is six beats. I wish
more callers would do it.
Read also mentioned "avoidance of teaching".
But we ARE teachers. You may CALL it a walk-through, but what you are
actually doing is TEACHING the dance. And if the dance will work better if
you point out some key items then go head and point them out, i.e. teach!
In fact there are LOTS of moves that are really 6+2:
Down the Hall in Lines of Four (6) Turn Alone (2).
Swing (6) open out (with a twirl maybe) for the next move (2)
Star/Circle Left (6) turn to prepare to go back the other way (2)
These are all things that cause dancers to be late because they do an eight
beat move and then spend the first part of the next phrase preparing for the
next move. I suspect it might help a lot if we mentioned the 6/2 concept
more when calling/teaching!
Other examples that would benefit from a few key phrases from the caller
(these are all from recent dances attended by hundreds of "experienced"
dancers):
Down the Hall in Lines of Four (4) California Twirl (4) - it's amazing how
many dancers think they can do California Twirl in one beat and end up
making lines crash - callers could just mention that California Twirl takes
longer than Turn Alone so start around beat 5. (E.g Balance the Ring (4)
California Twirl (4))
Men Allemande Left 1 & 1/2 - please, please, please tell them that it is
dancing and not arm-wrestling - that if their arm moves closer to their body
then they LOSE! :-) It is so frustrating having to fight (which I won't do
any more after two shoulder operations) or accept that you aren't going to
get around easily and that you aren't going to be able to spin out because
it is too late and your arm has been forced into an awkward position.
Swings where your partner hangs, grips, clamps, leans or otherwise prevents
a wonderful experience - I wish callers would mention more (even to the most
"experienced" dancers) that it is a loving embrace, a gentle counterbalance
and relaxing will make the experience so much better.
It only takes a second to mention these and similar elements during a
walk-through. If we all drip-feed good ideas then some of the dancers will
try them out and enjoy them.
Yes, we should teach! :-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Hi Jonathan,
It depends on how you interpret "push your partner back". People
could actually be quite close to their partners if they allow their arms to
bend, so then the "Ladies, go back" might be worthwhile.
I call it regularly and have always interpreted it as "Take two
hands with your partner, as in a Poussette; make a nice firm rectangle with
your arms and maintain that frame throughout the move" (but not necessarily
with those words when addressing the dancers!). In this case you will end
up in the right relative position to start the Box the Gnat, so the only
instruction I give is "As you move away from the centre change to a
right-to-right hold".
Note, with a small number of dancers it is often better to reverse
the directions - Men push first. Or you can just enjoy the crashes in the
middle and make a joke about the ability of the ladies to steer! (As long
as you are sure that no-one will be offended by such non-PC humour!)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
From: Jonathan Sivier <jsivier(a)illinois.edu>
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Subject: [Callers] question about Disturbed By Insects
Message-ID: <5304FC78.7060807(a)illinois.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
I'm planning to call the circle mixer Disturbed By Insects on Friday (in
part in honor of the 31st annual Insect Fear Film Festival being held this
weekend here in Champaign-Urbana) and I've got a question about one of the
instructions. The instructions I have are
Disturbed by Insects
Inga Morton
mixer
Formation: circle of couples, all facing counterclockwise
A1 Promenade (with inside hands joined)
California twirl
Promenade back
California twirl (then join both hands)
A2 Ladies, push your partner to the center
Gents, push your partner back
Ladies, push your partner to the center
Ladies, go back
B1 With your partner box the gnat
With your opposite to the left swat the flea
With your opposite to the right box the gnat
With your opposite to the left swat the flea
B2 With your opposite to the right balance and swing
This all makes sense except at the end of A2. If the ladies go back,
and the gents stay put, then they will be separated by a gap and won't be
able to reach their partner for the "box the gnat" at the beginning of B2.
So it seems to me that it should say either "Ladies, go back and the gents
follow" or "Gents, push your partner back again"
or something similar.
Does anyone have any advice on this? Thanks.
Jonathan
This feels like a good time to thank you, Chris, for setting up this list. Although it makes for tedious reading at times, it's mostly a great asset with good information and ideas. I don't comment much because someone usually says what I would have, but I keep learning here.
Bree Kalb
Carrboro, NC
Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Chris Weiler (Home) <
>chris.weiler(a)weirdtable.org> wrote:
>
>> This list will stay in it's current form. If someone wants to set up a
>> competing web-based forum, then they are free to and then people could vote
>> with their feet.
>>
>> Chris Weiler
>> SharedWeight moderator
>> Craftsbury, VT
Bree Kalb, LCSW
301 W. Weaver St.
Carrboro, NC 27510
919-932-6262 ext 216
http://www.thewellnessalliance.com/BreeKalb.html
Regarding the Use of Email -- Please Note: Although I use a firewall and my
computer is password protected, my emails are not encrypted. Therefore, I
cannot guarantee confidentiality of email communication. If you choose to
communicate confidential information with me via email, I will assume that
you have made an informed decision and I will view it as your agreement to
take the risk that email may be intercepted. Please be aware that email is
never an appropriate vehicle for emergency communication. If you are
canceling an appointment less than 48 hours in advance, please
also leave me a voice mail message at my office.
Good morning everyone.
I've been calling for 15 years and to this day, the hardest dances for me to call are private parties, like weddings. Usually, a "soon to be wed" couple comes to a regular dance for the first time, has a great time, and that's what they want at their wedding reception. What they fail to realize is the atmosphere of a wedding reception is completely different than a normal contra dance. The focus of attendees to a contra dance is the dance. The attendees of a wedding reception are there to socialize and usually drink.
I learned through trial and mostly errors that actual contra dances are rarely a good idea at such an event. The stumbling block is the contra progression and has caused more private dances to crash and burn than I can count. You don't want to spend much time teaching as the dancers will lose interest very quickly. So, I keep a stash of very simple proper dances, circles, and squares which seems to work the best. The Virginia Reel is always a favorite because it can become totally messed up, will still be fun, and is easy to recover. Even little kids can join in.
Would other callers share some of their experiences and solutions for these types of events? What dances have you found to be the most successful? I thought this might be relevant because if you call dances long enough, at some point you will be asked to do one of these.
Harold
-----Original Message-----
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net [mailto:callers-bounces@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Harold E. Watson
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 9:03 AM
To: Caller's discussion list
Subject: Re: [Callers] Programming on-the-fly
I echo the congrats on your full evening! I still remember mine. Balancing the planned program with the crowd you end up having is almost always a challenge. Your idea of a backup program was absolutely correct but sometimes you have to "dumb it down" further than you first thought. As with Alan, I keep an emergency list of very easy dances as a fallback. I call this list my "wedding" dances because if you ever call a dance for a wedding or a private party of non-contra dancers, this list is a must have (usually alcohol is involved). Maybe I'll start a thread on that.
Harold
-----Original Message-----
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net [mailto:callers-bounces@sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Winston, Alan P.
Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2014 5:30 PM
To: Caller's discussion list
Subject: Re: [Callers] Programming on-the-fly
Congratulations, Danielle, on your first full evening.
What I do:
- I have a file of easy contra dances with me.
- I know a bunch of one-night-stand (super easy, often whole-set rather than duple-minor) dances, including mixers, and will whip them out when necessary.
- Even without a bunch of beginners, no battle plan survives initial contact with the energy. Always evaluate how your program is going, whether the next dance you had is what's best for the people on the floor, etc.
(Sometimes they can handle more than you thought they could.)
I echo Andrea's point that as you develop as a caller you'll be able to teach beginners more in less time.
-- Alan
________________________________________
From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net [callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Danielle Boudreau [elle.boudreau(a)gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 10:16 AM
To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
Subject: [Callers] Programming on-the-fly
Good morning,
My name is Danielle, and I am a new caller in New Mexico. I just called my first full evening last night. We ended up having a rather large group of beginners, so much so that I could use neither my planned program nor even my backup program that I thought would be appropriate for a mixed crowd. I ended up programming on the fly, which didn't go as smoothly as I would have liked.
I'd love to hear what other callers do in this situation, or how they are able to avoid it with prep work beforehand.
Thanks!
Danielle
--
Danielle Boudreau
<dbou(a)unm.edu> elle.boudreau(a)gmail.com
cell: (505) 377-3071
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
When I started contra dancing, people know how to allemande. But over the years people starting bending and twisting the wrists of those with whom they allemanded, so today, in defense, dancers often allemande with a stiff open, bent non-thumb fingers, or wrist to wrist. Thus I was pondering a workshop on correct allemanding:
1) thumbs interlocked, the other four fingers wrapped over the other's hand,
2) the top of your hand and top of forearm forming a straight line, ensuring the other's wrist is not contorted
3) arm not held stiff, but used as a spring to maintain comfortable tension with the other dancer.
Such a workshop should be held in the middle of the evening, last 5-8 minutes minutes, and precede a dance with multiple allemandes.
So I am asking for dances which have at least three, and preferably four allemandes
Michael Fuerst 802 N Broadway Urbana IL 61801 217-239-5844
Links to photos of many of my drawings and paintings are at www.ArtComesFuerst.com
[Lots of other posts trimmed...]
Similar to a previous comment, and knowing one size does not fit all, I try
to preface any "style points" with a fellow dancer with "it would help me
if..." and then describe or show my desired interaction behavior. Puts the
issue totally on me and makes it sound like I'm asking a favor of them to
adjust to my needs, not correcting them -- if it leads to further good form
from them generally thereafter, so much the better. I've not had a negative
reaction to this since I started doing it.
BTW, for allemandes I use a connection that I picked up somewhere in my
contra travels (which sounds a lot like some of he best practices described
to this point). I find this to be fairly common where I dance. As a picture
is worth a thousand words, here it is (note I'm torqued slightly in these
due to holding the camera with the other hand for the photo -- the normal
connection is neutral and unstressed but results in good weight):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3My2DFMxZpOb3g1MVJWSS1lOGc/edit?usp=shari…
-Don
For me (a short person -- but only on the outside), a problem I
occasionally have with some tall dancers is the failure to take relative arm length
differential into consideration during the swing. If his left arm is nearly
straight, my right is hyperextended and I'm off balance.
April Blum
I've noticed some tall dancers bend their knees and stoop a bit to make them closer to the height of the person they are swinging with. A very nice gesture.
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 09:23:35 -0500
> From: George Mercer <geopmercer(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Subject: [Callers] Height diffferential
> Message-ID:
> <CACRi76uc=H2hPBCN0DKrX_e9UDBkZjEDYbPYJq=qFq9dbFMmGw(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> A number of years ago I danced a number of times with a woman who was much
> shorter than me. I am about 5'6" or so on a good day. She was probably
> 4'8" give or take an inch. When we'd go into a swing, as my arm went around
> her to her back, she'd lock her left arm down so that I could hardly get my
> right hand past her side. At first I thought it was bad form on her part,
> but let it be. Then as I watched her dance with others, I realized that
> when her co-swinger managed to get his arm around her to the "normal" place
> it had the result of lifting her left side up to what appeared to me to be
> a discomfort level. The taller the man, the further her left side was
> forced to go. I had to learn a new approach to entering a swing, even to
> lean toward bad form when the height of the other dancer led me to an
> adjusted approach. I'm not suggesting we should teach this, but thinking
> about how your technique (good or bad) can cause another discomfort is
> worth thinking about. Over the year I've danced enough with men that I've
> also experienced discomfort with this height differential. Just thinking
> out loud. Thanks.
>
Aahz wrote to Erik:
>
> I have no idea what you mean by "guideposts", though; from my POV either
> the thumbs are interlocked or they're not. (If each person's thumb can
> touch the other person's webbing between thumb and forefinger they're
> interlocked.)
>
I believe most dancers can make a distinction between holding your hand in
a position (e.g. with interlocking thumbs), and gripping based on that same
position. How can we best communicate that difference?
I ask people to feel the connection through their entire arm, and their
entire body, and I avoid the term "grip" as well. Also, I find that when
the music is faster than people are comfortable with, they tend to grip
more -- so before asking the dancers to change I might first start with the
band or other factors.
I also remind dancers that they will eventually let go of the hand
connection they've made, and to make sure they allow other dancers to leave
them comfortably.
Also, Lindsay spoke of saying "ouch," adjusting the offending hand, and
saying "sorry, carpal tunnel." This has the benefit of making it about him
-- "this is what works for me" -- moreso than making it about the other
person -- "you're doing it wrong." Hard to do in a short time without
practice, but worth practicing that attitude as a dancer so you can
communicate quickly and effectively. (Upon re-reading, this does appear to
support scripting comments for common quandaries).
--Jerome
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0858
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
"We should consider every day lost on which we have not danced at least
once."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche
OK, I don't usually enter these discussions because, although I find reading the posts interesting, by the time I see them, every possible opinion has already been expressed, with approximately equal vehemence on all sides, and as a result I don't usually feel that I have much to add. However, in this case I'll chime in that I agree with Eric, that the interlocking thumbs is rather nice, at least for those who can tolerate it. For one thing, it is how I learned to dance, and it feels more "right" that way. For another, it provides (in my opinion) a more firm connection between the dancers. (Here, Larry Jennings' description - in Zesty Contras - of what he called a "zesty" dancing style comes to mind.) But, as I point out in my beginners' sessions, some people - I am married to one - prefer not to have their thumbs involved, so they will come to you "without a thumb showing"… so, take what they give you and work with it. No big deal.
Someone pointed out that the interlocking thumb grip doesn't fit their style of dancing, because (I gather) they do a lot of spinning, or something. That's fine, don't use the interlocking grip. In fact, please don't. No big deal. My main point is that personally, I would find it a loss if the interlocking grip went away entirely. I enjoy using it with others who know how to use it.
On Feb 17, 2014, at 9:00 AM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
> callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Dances with three or more allemandes (Michael Fuerst)
> 2. Re: Dances with three or more allemandes (Michael Dyck)
> 3. Re: allemandes (Russell Frank)
> 4. Re: Dances with three or more allemandes (Jerome Grisanti)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:43:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: Michael Fuerst <mjerryfuerst(a)yahoo.com>
> To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Dances with three or more allemandes
> Message-ID:
> <1392572591.59857.YahooMailNeo(a)web140705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Thanks you Joy and Les for the suggested dances. ? ?
> Does anyone have additional suggestions?
> I think what I had in mind are dances where everyone allemandes 1 1/2 at least once plus allemande 3/4 or more at least one additional time
> ?
> Michael Fuerst ? ? ?802 N Broadway ? ? ?Urbana IL 61801?????? 217-239-5844
>
>
>
> On Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:25 AM, Aahz Maruch <aahz(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014, Erik Hoffman wrote:
>> On 2/15/2014 10:32 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014, Michael Fuerst wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I should have said thumbs an wrapped around the other's hand.
>>>> Interlocked was the wrong.
>>>
>>> <whew> I do know people who believe that interlocked thumbs are
>>> correct, and I've been on a campaign to discourage the practice. ;-)
>>
>> So, Aahz, why do you want to eliminate it? I'm talking about the
>> thumbs up as guideposts, fingers hooked around the others hand, a
>> hook, not a grip, wrists straight, fingers curved. Is it just the
>> safety issue? I play music. I teach music. I worry a lot about my
>> hands! I have things I do to protect myself, and I don't let people
>> grab and grip, or bend my wrist in some painful way.
>
> Oddly enough, as has been pointed out here, you are a somewhat large-ish
> man -- that means your personal safety requirements are not necessarily
> what's appropriate for the general dancer population.
>
> So yeah, it's pretty much all about safety from my POV.? Any kind of
> spinning move out of allemande or wave risks yanking the thumb.? And
> actually, my concern is more about waves than allemandes: the grip is
> mostly the same for both and the spinning half-sashy is pretty much
> standard these days.
>
> I have no idea what you mean by "guideposts", though; from my POV either
> the thumbs are interlocked or they're not.? (If each person's thumb can
> touch the other person's webbing between thumb and forefinger they're
> interlocked.)
> --
> Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? http://rule6.info/
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? <*>? ? ? ? ? <*>? ? ? ? ? <*>
> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 10:46:27 -0800
> From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck(a)ibiblio.org>
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Dances with three or more allemandes
> Message-ID: <53010783.1040809(a)ibiblio.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 14-02-15 10:18 AM, Michael Fuerst wrote:
>>
>> So I am asking for dances which have at least three, and preferably four allemandes
>
> Searching my personal collection, I find:
>
> 6 allemandes:
> "Al's Half a Heyday" [Al Olson] (but 2 are only 1/2)
>
> 5 allemandes:
> "Jeffro's Tree" [Don Flaherty]
> "Chuck the Budgie" [Rick Mohr]
> "Remember the Alamo" [Gene Hubert] (but 4 are only 1/2)
>
> 4 allemandes:
> "Two Whos in the Middle" [Al Olson]
> "Chichester House Reel" [Steve Zakon]
> "Dr Brown's Prescription" [David Kirchner]
>
> 4 allemandes, one of which is only 1/2:
> "Coal Country Contra" [Ron Buchanan]
> "Eric on Mondays" [David Kaynor]
> "Al's Answer" [Al Olson -> David Kaynor]
> "Hey in the Middle" [Tom Hinds]
> "Thinking of John" [Erik Hoffman]
> "Hull's Surprise" [Tom Hinds]
>
> 4 allemandes, two of which are only 1/2:
> "Batja's Breakdown" [Tom Hinds]
> "Ben's Spinoff #3" [Gene Hubert]
> "Ben's Spinoff #2" [Gene Hubert]
> "Southern Swing" [Steve Zakon]
> "Fuller Park Fantasy" [Paul Balliet]
> "Sunday on the Green" [Jim Kitch] (circle mixer)
>
> -Michael
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:40:45 -0800
> From: Russell Frank <russell.knarf(a)gmail.com>
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Subject: Re: [Callers] allemandes
> Message-ID:
> <CABSg-QF9RQavoNX5h_yaQCb12pwX3YeKRri=w26NsmEWk-TvHQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Allemandes are my most frequent subject for rants, so I'll weigh in here
> (briefly) as a very experienced dancer/ inexperienced caller. As a dancer,
> the thing I have found most helpful personally is to make sure to keep my
> hand well away from my chest and at least somewhat to the side. This allows
> me free movement and gives me room to adjust to whatever the other person
> may be doing. If I want to give more or less weight, I can use my bicep,
> without straining wrist and fingers. (I also need to take larger steps or
> walk faster to get around.) I'm not sure anything an ordinary caller says
> can help much at this point, but pointing out that the arm should be
> extended seems non-controversial and might help.
>
> At least in theory, I'm in favor of using thumbs as guideposts, because
> they almost guarantee a good hand alignment (in my opinion), which is hard
> to achieve otherwise. Disengaging the thumbs is an option, but it often
> doesn't happen in the heat of dancing. In practice, I understand the need
> to dance defensively, but the avoidance of thumbs has created some awful
> habits.
>
> Russell Frank
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:09:41 -0600
> From: Jerome Grisanti <jerome.grisanti(a)gmail.com>
> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Dances with three or more allemandes
> Message-ID:
> <CAD6SnUS+KoxRp5v3f_K8O805GZDbskLmcz79_f_JRAjfU3bxBQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Aahz wrote to Erik:
>
>>
>> I have no idea what you mean by "guideposts", though; from my POV either
>> the thumbs are interlocked or they're not. (If each person's thumb can
>> touch the other person's webbing between thumb and forefinger they're
>> interlocked.)
>>
>
> I believe most dancers can make a distinction between holding your hand in
> a position (e.g. with interlocking thumbs), and gripping based on that same
> position. How can we best communicate that difference?
>
> I ask people to feel the connection through their entire arm, and their
> entire body, and I avoid the term "grip" as well. Also, I find that when
> the music is faster than people are comfortable with, they tend to grip
> more -- so before asking the dancers to change I might first start with the
> band or other factors.
>
> I also remind dancers that they will eventually let go of the hand
> connection they've made, and to make sure they allow other dancers to leave
> them comfortably.
>
> Also, Lindsay spoke of saying "ouch," adjusting the offending hand, and
> saying "sorry, carpal tunnel." This has the benefit of making it about him
> -- "this is what works for me" -- moreso than making it about the other
> person -- "you're doing it wrong." Hard to do in a short time without
> practice, but worth practicing that attitude as a dancer so you can
> communicate quickly and effectively. (Upon re-reading, this does appear to
> support scripting comments for common quandaries).
>
> --Jerome
>
> --
> Jerome Grisanti
> 660-528-0858
> http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
>
> "We should consider every day lost on which we have not danced at least
> once."
> -- Friedrich Nietzsche
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
> End of Callers Digest, Vol 114, Issue 33
> ****************************************
>