I started dancing 22 years ago in Vancouver and continue in Ottawa. In both
of these communities we line up proper, take hands four and cross over when
we are told to do so by the caller. Many these days do cross over in
advance of being told, and almost all our dances are improper. But I have
heard it said over the years (and have said it myself, sort of jokingly)
"wait to be told because it might be a proper dance." Occasionally we do a
proper dance (I have called a few myself), and I do like them for the
variety.
In response to another comment about same-gender right and left through, I
also had a hard time calling a dance with that move the one time I called
it, and would now only do that one if I felt that the hall could handle a
moment of confusion. Gender-bending always throws some of even the most
experienced dancers, but it is interesting that this same gender move is
actually from a very old dance, not from a new choreographer trying to be
gender free.
I like what Greg said about the caller pausing to do the instructions to
allow for socializing. I haven't made this a conscious choice but I think I
naturally do that as well, if only because I want to make sure everyone who
wants to dance is in the line and that can take awhile, especially for shy
newcomers, and it is so important not to start before they are ready. I
also like what he says about specifying the number of sets. When I am
dancing and we are not sure how many sets to make, I have sometimes wished
the caller would say something. Different dances can require different
lengths of sets.
Happy dancing!
Maura Volante
Ottawa Ontario Canada
Martha wrote:
> This is probably a regional or specific community thing. In our village, St
> Louis, Missouri, we just line up improper, and there's a bit of a confused
> scuffle if a caller decides (rarely) to call a proper dance. Even though we
> do that, our callers usually say, just for tradition's sake, "Line up for a
> contra dance, ones cross over" or, if the caller has been calling for 20-30
> years, "actives change places", but it's usually irrelevant, since the
> whole hall is already in that formation.
>
I do specify the number of lines, and I tell the dancers to "cross over,"
but it's not "...just for tradition's sake." After lines have formed the
caller has lost influence over the partnering process. Consequently I try
to intervene before lines have formed for three reasons:
1. It allows me to influence partnering decisions at this critical point
when the integration of first-timers is so important. I get the attention
of the hall and say: "If you are new to this kind of dancing please find a
partner who has danced for at least one night. I will tell you everything
you need to know and your more experienced partner will show you all of the
moves. Please form ___ contra dance lines." This re-affirms what I told
the first-timers in the orientation but, more important, it sends a clear
signal to the regulars that they have a role to play in partnering with
first-timers. It also lets everyone know that I have a plan for
integrating newcomers into the hall.
2. It makes it clear that I will take responsibility for set formation,
relieving the dancers of this responsibility.
3. I then allow time for socializing in the lines. This is important
because it makes it easier for me to earn the attention of the hall when I
begin the walk-through. The instructions: "Please take hands four from the
top," and, moments later, "Ones cross over," are important signals to the
regulars. They establish a routine that the regulars quickly recognize.
This empowers the regulars because they know what is going to happen next
and they can plan a dignified ending to the story they are telling their
new friend. This routine "announces" that I am about to begin the walk
through and sets an example of courtesy and consideration because the
caller is not interrupting the socializing in the sets by "shouting down"
people over the mike. (I often see the regulars "shushing" their partner
and directing their partners attention to my voice when I begin the
walk-through.) By informing the regulars the caller gives them power,
authority, and a sense of investment in the tradition.
I believe that on-time starts are critical to this process. If you see
lines and sets forming for the first dance of the evening, without any
instructions, it may be that your orientation session has run over time.
The caller needs to maintain control over the process of line formation and
if the lines are formed too late the partnering process is probably well
under way. It is better to facilitate this process from the get go.
Just a thought,
Greg McKenzie
--- Greg wrote:
"I get the attention of the hall and say: "If you are new to this kind of dancing
please find a partner who has danced for at least one night..."
I certainly agree with Greg that having experienced dancers partner with newcomers
can be really helpful. I'd suggest that the instructions be changed, however,
so that the experienced dancers are encouraged to seek out a newcomer. Newbies
have no way of knowing if someone is experienced or not, whereas the regulars
at a given series will probably be able to spot new faces.
Similarly, in some situations I'll ask experienced dancers to raise their hands
and to wait, and will request newer dancers to ask one of those people as a partner
for the next dance. The old hands (old feet?) are more being the center of attention
that would be the case if I asked all the newcomers to raise their hands.
Just another thought,
David Millstone
There was a wonderful session at this year's NEFFA hosted by David
Millstone. It featured a panel consisting of Bob McQuillan, Ralph
Sweet, Dudley Laufman, Bill Spence and Andy Spence with David Millstone
in the chair.
Fortunately, it was captured in 6 videos which are available on You
Tube. I have provided links to them in the Contra Resources section of
my web site. I hope that this will make it easier to find them and let
you watch them in the correct sequence.
The links can be found at
http://www.michaelbarraclough.com/web-links/contra-dance.
Michael Barraclough
www.michaelbarraclough.com
Hi All,
I have Settlement Swing by Penn Fix as this:
A1 Neighbor dosido to long wavy line G face out, Ladies face in, rt hand to N
Bal the wave, alle right 1x, re-form the wave
A2 Balance wave, Neighbor swing
B1 Ladies chain, over and back
B2 One’s balance and swing
I'm wondering what your instructions would be for the Balance at the start of A2? Balance right, then left again, Or for this second long wave, Balance left, then right?
Thanks!
Nancy Turner
Waitsfield VT
Contra dancing has almost entirely lost the 'proper' formation, with
gents in one line and ladies in another. For most of contra dancing's
history, however, that was the standard formation and many people,
especially callers, still think of it that way.
I was at a dance recently where the caller noticed that there were
many new dancers and that it probably wouldn't work to just wait for
people to get into position. They told all the couples to stand with
the ladies in one line and the gents in another, to take hands for
from the top, and that this was proper formation. Then they introduced
1s and 2s and had all the ones cross over. But they didn't call any
proper or assymetric dances all night! Which is fine; I think they
chose good dances for the crowd. But why introduce the terminology?
Especially when there's so many other terms we want them to be
absorbing?
Jeff
PS: I also posted this on my blog, and there are some comments there:
http://www.jefftk.com/news/2012-05-04.html
Can any of you help me identify a dance that we danced during the last
NEFFA session on Sunday? The dance in question was called with the
Festival Orchestra playing and it may have been called by Sue Rosen.
The key figures were 2 "past through to an ocean wave" figures. In one
case you end with your neighbor in your right hand, and the other time
you end with your partner in the same place. The dance flowed very
smoothly and i liked it a lot, so any help with the title, author, or
the choreography would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rich Hart.
With apologies to all who are having deja vu feelings based on my
previous recommendations of this dance, how about yet another version
of Ellen's Green Jig? Can be danced improper, or if you ignore how
people choose to end the swing, without regard to gents/ladies roles.
A1: Dosido neighbor; circle left to original positions.
A2: Balance the ring; swing partners, end facing the other couple.
B1: Right-hand star; circle right to home position, keep hands joined.
B2: 2s arch, 1s take a peek ("duck for the oyster");
1s arch, 2s peek; 2s carry an arch up over 1s, who duck under and
through, take no more than 1 step and let the next no. 2 couple move
up to meet them (to prevent the whole set from drifting away from the
top of the set).
Variations of this dance have worked for just about every kind of
group I've encountered. You can probably craft a cool one of your
own...Hope you have great music; that can make almost anything you do
a terrific experience.
Chip Hedler