Contra Callers

contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net

14 participants
4360 discussions

by Patricia Campbell via Callers

What's your Broken Transcription, Don? On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Don Veino via Callers < callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > Broken Sixpence? I personally find the triple Dosi excessive and use my > "accidental" creation Broken Transcription in place of it. > > Broken Sixpence – DI – Don Armstrong > > A1 > > (8) N Dosido > > (8) L Dosido > > A2 > > (8) G Dosido > > (8) Ones Swing, *End facing down the hall* > > *Twos tack on to outside ends* > > B1 > > (8) Down the Hall 4 in Line, turn Alone > > (8) Up the Hall, Bend the Line > > B2 > > (8) L Chain *to P* > > (8) L Chain *to N* > > > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Aahz Maruch via Callers < > callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > >> The thread about dizziness reminded me of a dance I was in once or twice >> in the late 80s or early 90s and have never seen since. It was unusual >> in having a triple dosado -- yes, consecutive, I think neighbor, partner, >> neighbor. >> >> Anyone have a clue what I'm referring to? >> -- >> Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 >> http://rule6.info/ >> <*> <*> <*> >> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Callers mailing list >> Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net >> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net > > _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 1 month

Re: [Callers] Medleys (was Techno contras)

by Aahz Maruch via Callers

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015, Eric Black via Callers wrote: > > MEDLEYS: Medleys are becoming or have become mainstream at many contra > dances. I often call a 3-dance no-walkthrough medley at a regular > contra even with lots of beginners (in fact, I did so several times > on my recent tour in NC), and local dancers kind of expect it. I do > 45-minute medleys from time to time (not at a regular evening dance). > Lots of callers do medleys, and dancers get a thrill from successfully > navigating an accessible medley chosen for the crowd. For my taste, > the most salient aspect of a Techno Contra is the long-running dance > set, with the option (and encouragement) for people to drop out at the > bottom, get refreshed, maybe change partners, and join back in. But > for sure the long medley is not restricted to a techno. Medleys suck for people with hearing impairments. As I've mentioned before, the average contra caller definitely has worse enunciation than the average square dance caller, amplified by sound that focuses more on music than voice. Trying to hear calling over the music while dancing really doesn't work very well. (I can manage because I have a good kinesthetic sense and many years of experience with both contra and folk dance -- most of the folk dances I know I never was formally taught, so I'm pretty good at just following along. But I still loathe medleys, and I would be much more inclined to sit them out if I knew ahead of time when one was being called.) -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 1 month

Triple dosado?

by Aahz Maruch via Callers

The thread about dizziness reminded me of a dance I was in once or twice in the late 80s or early 90s and have never seen since. It was unusual in having a triple dosado -- yes, consecutive, I think neighbor, partner, neighbor. Anyone have a clue what I'm referring to? -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 1 month

Re: [Callers] Solo fiddler or recorded music?

by Jacob Nancy Bloom via Callers

I would absolutely believe that the dancers were completely confounded by "right and left through". I remember how surprised I was, when I called my first dance, to discover how much more confusing it was than a Ladie's Chain. If you are used to both of them, then you tend to think of them as being similar. If you've never done either, then one of them has you connected to other people, while the other leaves you by yourself, trying to figure out which way to turn (and usually getting it wrong.) But learning which figures are easier and harder comes quickly. Learning which dances to call for a given crowd and how to teach them efficiently is a neverending process! Jacob On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Brooks Hart via Callers < callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > So, as the original poster, I am reporting back. > > The dance with the solo fiddler was a mixed bag. The music was very nice, > but because I am new to calling, and our dancers are 99% beginners, way too > much time was spent on walk-throughs and teaching. The fiddler sat out for > long stretches of time, which seemed like a waste of his time and the money > spent on live music. > > I thought I had picked easy dances, but you wouldn't believe how > confounded so many of the people were at "right and left through", and > that falls on me and my lack of experience with teaching and crowd > wrangling. > > A special moment for everyone, though, was doing a circle waltz dance with > the fiddler playing, unplugged, in the center of the circle. > > So, thanks again for everyone's input and encouragement, > Brooks > > > > > > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:50:51 -0700 > > To: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > > Subject: Re: [Callers] Solo fiddler or recorded music? > > From: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > > > > [resting up before the CALLERLAB convention, catching up on some older > > messages] > > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015, Neal Schlein via Callers wrote: > > > > > > So, the moral of the story is that if a caller isn't USED to working > with a > > > band, live music isn't necessarily going to result in the best > experience > > > for the dancers. > > > > My experience as a relatively new caller is that it also depends on the > > caller's experience as a dancer. My hearing makes it a bit difficult to > > tune into the phrasing of a live band to call at the correct times, but > > because I've been contra dancing for so many years (almost exclusively to > > live music) I can roughly manage it -- and I know what it's supposed to > > sound like. > > -- > > Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ > > <*> <*> <*> > > Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html > > _______________________________________________ > > Callers mailing list > > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net > > _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 1 month

Re: [Callers] Solo fiddler or recorded music?

by Erik Hoffman via Callers

Ah! the trials and tribulations of what some of us call The One Night Stand Dance. Many of us have learned that, when calling to a group of beginners, hands-four dances come way late in the evening, if at all. Right & left thru, women chain, progressing, are all big challenges for beginners. Even understanding the line is a challenge. You might want to purchase a book or two on the subject. Dudley's /Traditional Barn Dances with Calls/, is a great one, as are Marian Rose's /Step Lively /books, and The New England Dancing Masters books. And, of course, I could use this for unsolicited self promotion, as I wrote a book called /Old-Time Dance Calling for Weddings, Parties, and One-Night Stands/. ($18 to be mailed to you, $15 if you come get it...). ~erik hoffman On 3/27/2015 7:47 AM, Brooks Hart via Callers wrote: > So, as the original poster, I am reporting back. > > The dance with the solo fiddler was a mixed bag. The music was very > nice, but because I am new to calling, and our dancers are 99% > beginners, way too much time was spent on walk-throughs and teaching. > The fiddler sat out for long stretches of time, which seemed like a > waste of his time and the money spent on live music. > > I thought I had picked easy dances, but you wouldn't believe how > confounded so many of the people were at "right and left through", > and that falls on me and my lack of experience with teaching and > crowd wrangling. > > A special moment for everyone, though, was doing a circle waltz dance > with the fiddler playing, unplugged, in the center of the circle. > > So, thanks again for everyone's input and encouragement, > Brooks > > > > > > Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 03:50:51 -0700 > > To: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > > Subject: Re: [Callers] Solo fiddler or recorded music? > > From: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > > > > [resting up before the CALLERLAB convention, catching up on some older > > messages] > > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015, Neal Schlein via Callers wrote: > > > > > > So, the moral of the story is that if a caller isn't USED to > working with a > > > band, live music isn't necessarily going to result in the best > experience > > > for the dancers. > > > > My experience as a relatively new caller is that it also depends on the > > caller's experience as a dancer. My hearing makes it a bit difficult to > > tune into the phrasing of a live band to call at the correct times, but > > because I've been contra dancing for so many years (almost > exclusively to > > live music) I can roughly manage it -- and I know what it's supposed to > > sound like. > > -- > > Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ > > <*> <*> <*> > > Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html > > _______________________________________________ > > Callers mailing list > > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 1 month

Re: [Callers] Dizziness Equivalents

by Erik Hoffman via Callers

Bill wrote about dizziness: > To put this into "real life" perspective, I have only had dancers > complain about ONE DANCE in this regard and that's Carol Ormand's "You > Can't Get There From Here" which has a LOT of CCW motion.. I have to > also add that some dancers have actually REQUESTED this dance because > they love it so much!!! (xxoo Carol if you're reading this) So how do > you deal with this from a dance programming perspective??.. keep > things varied I guess.. In the 80s a few of us called Dan Pearl's dance, Rendezvous "The Chiropractor's Delight," Circle left, circle left swing for 16 counts. We figured all that leftness would require a back-cracking adjustment.... ~erik hoffman _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 1 month

Re: [Callers] sharedweight musicians' list

by Seth Seeger

Yup. Archive problems. I am in the process of getting everything back in working order. Will probably be another month or two before it's all straightened out again. Seth On 03/08/2015 04:04 PM, Don Veino via Callers wrote: > Just FYI, something seems to be off for that list's archives. Clicking > on links in the matrix by month list brings up Organizers' list posts. > See http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/musicians-sharedweight.net/ . > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 3:51 PM, jill allen via Callers > <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> wrote: > > Just wanted to let you all know that the shared weight email list > for musicians has been reinvigorated! > > Myself (KS), Max Newman (MA), and Susie Lorand (MI) are on a CDSS > Task Group about dance musicians. Our ultimate goal is to explore > the unique needs of dance musicians, and an immediate goal is to > help musicians to connect with each other and share resources. > Since this list already exists and has members, simply asking a > few questions has brought it out of the cobwebs. It's starting to > buzz... > > Please join, or share the following link with your musician friends. > > Jill Allen > > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/musicians-sharedweight.net > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net> > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 2 months

Re: [Callers] List archives (was Re: gender-free calling terms)

by Seth Seeger

Yup - I apologize for the continued archives goofs. I promise I am working on it. I know how important the archives are to this group. Seth On 02/24/2015 09:54 PM, James Saxe via Callers wrote: > Amy Carroll wrote: > >> If this whole discussion had already been gone over endlessly in the archives, I offer an apology for starting it again. I was not able to successfully pull any of it up when I searched. I'll try again later. > > For any who don't remember, there was an upheaval late last May > that led the list administrators to seek a new hosting site. > (You can read about in in the archives > > http://lists.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers-sharedweight.net/2014-May/d… > > under the subjects "Mailing list issues" and "More details on the > list changes". ) > > After the move, Seth managed to get the archives (mostly) restored, > but not the search function. > > However, Chris Page has compiled a collection of links to various > postings on the list > > http://chrispagecontra.awardspace.us/links/sharedweight.htm > > and many of those links work with the restored archive. Specifically, > some of the articles linked under various subtopics of "gender" deal > with role terminology. Note also that once you're viewing a message, > you can use the links near the top to bring up a list of archived > messages for that entire month (sorted by date, thread, subject, or > author) and look for relevant messages that Chris din't link to > directly. > > --Jim > > _______________________________________________ > Callers mailing list > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 2 months

Giant dance database?

by Maia McCormick via Callers

Hi all, I'm currently in programming school casting about for programming projects, and I had the idea of a giant searchable contradance database, where you can filter by move combination, etc. My question: is this something people would be interested in having? Or does it run the risk of infringing on intellectual property, or shortchanging dance writers on book sales, etc.? (Obviously no dances would be included without the author's permission, but it may be that making a huge ton of dances freely available and searchable in one place online would be a death blow to published books of dances, or have some other negative effect I'm not foreseeing right now...) Anyway: does anyone have any thoughts on this project? Cheers, Maia _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 9 months

New vs. Variation

by Ron Blechner via Callers

This question boils down, to me, to the question of "How much different does a dance need to be to be considered a new dance rather than a variation of an existing dance?" I've heard the 25% guideline. (So 8 measures for a 32 measure dance.) But it's obviously not that simple. If I flip the A and B of many dances, they're danceable but clearly not new dances, just variations. What are your thoughts on what makes a dance "new" vs "variation"? -Ron T Blechner (As for the database, having a way to tag that other callers have successfully called it would add legitimacy.) On Jul 30, 2014 3:40 AM, "Michael Fuerst via Callers" < callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote: > > Who will decide what dances merit placement in the database? _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net

10 years, 9 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Contra Callers