Hi all,
I hesitate to make my first post to a new (to me) list be about culturally sensitive terminology because I fear that that sometimes stirs up controversy, but this is a remarkable coincidence:
I finally got around to joining this list yesterday because I wanted to ask the list whether anyone knows a less objectionable term for the Dixie Twirl move: I encountered the move in a dance I was interested in learning to call,
but I’d be unwilling to call using a dance term with the word “Dixie” in it. Then I realized I could just say “middles arch, rights lead under” and thus both avoid the term “Dixie” and avoid making my first post on this group be about culturally sensitive terminology. :-)
But then in receiving my very first Caller’s Digest, I see a recommendation for using the term Dixie in a dance name. So I’m getting up my courage to post, hoping that I’m not wading into a hornet’s nest...
I would recommend against using Dixie in a dance name or even using it as a dance term. Please allow me to explain:
I lived in Alabama for 14 years. In my personal experience, Dixie is a term that is nearly always used by white people with warped nostalgia for the antebellum South (choosing to ignore the fact that things weren’t so great for black residents back then). I find that glorifying “Dixie” is done by the same folks who glorify the rebel (confederate) flag: It’s done supposedly in the name of honoring heritage, but its closeted purpose is to express longing for the "Good Old Days" when whites were in charge and blacks were subordinate.
For those interested in the topic here’s an article that touches on the current controversy around the word: https://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Heart-of-Dixie-vanishing-fr… <https://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Heart-of-Dixie-vanishing-fr…>
I’ll just be avoiding it. I’m planning to go with “middles arch, rights lead under” unless someone can suggest a better term or phrase?
Thanks all, and lovely to meet you!
Becky
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: callers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Subject: Callers Digest, Vol 64, Issue 5
> Date: August 7, 2019 at 4:07:07 PM EDT
> To: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> Reply-To: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 23:36:49 -0400
> From: Luke Donforth <luke.donev(a)gmail.com <mailto:luke.donev@gmail.com>>
> To: Gregory Frock <gregfrock(a)gmail.com <mailto:gregfrock@gmail.com>>
> Cc: "Callers(a)Lists.Sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@Lists.Sharedweight.net>" <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Riffing on "The Nice Combination"
> Message-ID:
> <CAFrKOZZzWN9mEB9_TJem06o_ebqttPXRs6HUU7Gf58KxK9mFGQ(a)mail.gmail.com <mailto:CAFrKOZZzWN9mEB9_TJem06o_ebqttPXRs6HUU7Gf58KxK9mFGQ@mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Good suggestion. And thank you all for the other variants and ideas :-D
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 9:05 AM Gregory Frock <gregfrock(a)gmail.com <mailto:gregfrock@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> For title, might I suggest "The Dixie Combination"? The couple trading
>> figure is often called a Dixie Twirl, and there already exist "A New
>> Combination" and "The Nice Combination".
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 2:28 PM Luke Donforth via Callers <
>> callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I was programming for tonight, and looked at Gene Hubert's classic "The
>>> Nice Combination" (N B&S, Dwn 4, turn as cpls, C L 3/4, P S, Ld/robin
>>> chain, LHS); and wondered what the simplest variant that would flow well
>>> with a gents/larks chain instead of a ladies/robins chain.
>>>
>>> What I've come up with is below. Anyone got a prior on it? Anyone got a
>>> variant with a gents/larks chain they like more?
>>>
>>> The New Combination
>>>
>>> A1 -----------
>>> (4,12) Neighbors balance and swing
>>> A2 -----------
>>> (6) Down the hall four line
>>> (4) Pair on the right make an arch, gent/lark on the left lead through,
>>> lady/robin on the right walks to far side, inverting the line
>>> (8) Come back up the hall and bend the ends
>>> B1 -----------
>>> (6) Circle left 3/4
>>> (10) Partners swing
>>> B2 -----------
>>> (8) Gents/Larks chain (pull by left, courtesy turn with neighbor)
>>> (8) Right-hand star 1x
>>>
>>> I'm planning on using Gene's original tonight in Belfast (and probably
>>> the vast majority of the time, it's a great dance); but I thought an
>>> accessible gents/larks chain would be nice.
>>>
>>> I appreciate hearing your thoughts.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luke Donforth
>>> Luke.Donforth(a)gmail.com <mailto:Luke.Donforth@gmail.com> <Luke.Donev(a)gmail.com <mailto:Luke.Donev@gmail.com>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> List Name: Callers mailing list
>>> List Address: Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net>
>>> Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/ <https://www.mail-archive.com/callers@lists.sharedweight.net/>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Luke Donforth
> Luke.Donforth(a)gmail.com <mailto:Luke.Donforth@gmail.com> <Luke.Donev(a)gmail.com <mailto:Luke.Donev@gmail.com>>
Hello all,
I was programming for tonight, and looked at Gene Hubert's classic "The
Nice Combination" (N B&S, Dwn 4, turn as cpls, C L 3/4, P S, Ld/robin
chain, LHS); and wondered what the simplest variant that would flow well
with a gents/larks chain instead of a ladies/robins chain.
What I've come up with is below. Anyone got a prior on it? Anyone got a
variant with a gents/larks chain they like more?
The New Combination
A1 -----------
(4,12) Neighbors balance and swing
A2 -----------
(6) Down the hall four line
(4) Pair on the right make an arch, gent/lark on the left lead through,
lady/robin on the right walks to far side, inverting the line
(8) Come back up the hall and bend the ends
B1 -----------
(6) Circle left 3/4
(10) Partners swing
B2 -----------
(8) Gents/Larks chain (pull by left, courtesy turn with neighbor)
(8) Right-hand star 1x
I'm planning on using Gene's original tonight in Belfast (and probably the
vast majority of the time, it's a great dance); but I thought an accessible
gents/larks chain would be nice.
I appreciate hearing your thoughts.
--
Luke Donforth
Luke.Donforth(a)gmail.com <Luke.Donev(a)gmail.com>
To clarify, the group of dancers I’ve been working with at Pinewoods has been a mix of older dancers who are new to this terminology as well as younger dancers who have been promoting the change.
Lisa
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 1, 2019, at 5:33 PM, Rich Goss <rich(a)richgoss.com> wrote:
>
> Lisa, thanks for sharing your observations.
>
> Seattle and Portland, OR dances seem to be moving to Larks and Robins as well. My next Portland dance on Aug 24th will be Larks and Robins. Not all dances are gender neutral terms at this point, but we do announce which terms will be used.
>
> Rich
>
>> On Aug 1, 2019, at 1:35 PM, Lisa Greenleaf via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>>
>> Update: today at contra class at Pinewoods I tried Lakes and Rivers. Rivers is not a satisfying or clear word to say for me personally, and the dancers said it got lost over the sound system. They overwhelmingly prefer Larks and Robins.
>>
>> Lisa
>>
At the urging of dancers who were recently at Harmony Week at Pinewoods, I tried Larks and Robins today for role identifiers in contra, and it was great. I physically like saying the word Robins more than the word Ravens, and the dancers were fine with it, too, even with a dance that had a Mad Robin. Callers—experiment!
Lisa
Sent from my iPhone
