"pass thru-partner trade"
Bob Livingston
On Tuesday, August 6, 2024 at 04:49:32 PM EDT, Julian Blechner via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I'd love more people to try swapping thus to "pass through, California Twirl to
face in" or, at least, Right and Left through (which seems to be slowly going out of
fashion?)
In dance,Julian Blechner
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 3:32 PM Elizabeth Bloom Albert <ealbert75(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Please, pretty please, with sugar ontop!
Please don’t call (or write) any moredances where a Half-Promenade (across the set) is
followed by a Circle to theLeft! With the possible exception of interlocking long wavy
lines-- another bigugh! in my book, there is nothing more jarring than the 1/2 Prom to a
Circle Leftcombo
I once attended an (out-of-town)dance where three dances were called that had that combo
(three!) and in spiteof all the (other) pretty good dances and excellent dance partners,
this iswhat I remember about that experience to this day!
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:29 AM Julian Blechner via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
My biggest nono is "too much clockwise". If moves are awkward or with meh flow,
that's not a health or safety thing. Whereas getting dizzy is.
In dance,
Julian Blechner
He/him
Western Mass
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 8:40 AM Angela DeCarlis via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Surprised no one's mentioned interlocking long wavy lines, yet — I think it's
relatively well-known that Lisa Greenleaf hates this move! Can't say I'm a huge
fan, either, but it has its moments.
For my two-cents, butterfly whirls are on thin ice! I'll program dances that include
this figure with a partner on rare occasion, and symmetrical dances with both a partner
and neighbor whirl could be novel enough to be okay (???) on a cold day, but I think I
would essentially never call a dance with only a neighbor butterfly whirl.
There are too many excellent dances to ever bother with the mediocre ones, honestly.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 3:14 AM Neal Schlein via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I agree with Jonathan about your existing list, and think that almost any sequence CAN be
used if done with knowledgeable intent.
However, for the general list of things to avoid I would nominate what I like to call
“fudge down the line,” which is any adjustment that a) happens solely because the sequence
doesn’t fully progress the couples and b) does not flow naturally from the existing
movement. (This most often happens in Beckett dances or those substantially in Beckett
formation; examples include a 2 count sideways slide along the line or a slightly angled
right and left thru.)
Notably, the 4 beat slide in “With Thanks to the Dean” and similar dances would not count
because they are full and discrete actions that are specifically accounted for in the flow
and timing.
Neal SchleinLibrarian, MSLIS
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:28 PM Michael Fuerst via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Depending on the flow of the dance, balance and box the gnat can often replace dsd and
shoulder rounds 1 1/2
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:17 PM Maia McCormick via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I don't have Bob's list handy, but I cribbed heavily from it to make this (much
less extensive) list of figures + timings, in case it's useful to anyone!
(This reminds me of some more things I don't like, ha. Circle L and pass through to
swing -- IME the swing always gets truncated. Dosido 1.5x and right shoulder round 1.5x
don't quiiite fit in 8 counts of music and are often frustrating. And I don't call
couples' dosidos anymore, they're a pain to execute correctly unless everyone in
the hall is EXTREMELY on top of it.)
--Maia McCormick (she/her)917.279.8194
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 12:02 AM Joe Harrington <contradancerjoe(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Is Bob Isaacs in the house? He has a giant spreadsheet with every possible move
transition and a count of the number of times it occurs in a set of dances that now
numbers in the hundreds or maybe a lot more. It’s interesting which unlikely combinations
do occur and which rarely do. I hope this someday sees the light of day.
—jh—
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:29 PM Maia McCormick via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Jeff, impressively bad, well done!
My biggest pet peeve is a RH chain (or promenade, or other move with a CCW courtesy turn)
into a circle L—though this is a very of-the-moment style preference, as I know plenty of
the classic dances have this combo. (Likewise for dances where just the 1s do a figure
while the 2s stand around, doubly so if the dance doesn’t alternate active couples.)
Long lines followed by a chain is quite idiomatic—and probably in part because of the
strength that idiom, a chain (or other courtesy turn figure) followed by long lines drives
me up a wall.
I don’t love long lines into a circle—I’ll tolerate it if the rest of the dance is really
exceptional, ehhhh.
--Maia McCormick (she/her)917.279.8194
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 10:31 PM Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Balance neighbor (4), swing partner (12)
Ones dosido below while twos seesaw above (8).
Long lines forward (4), swing on the side (8), long lines back (4).
Circle left 1x (6) pass through (2)
Jeff
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 9:51 PM Tepfer, Seth via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
- A right chain INTO a swing
- A swing into a circle right
- Standard right shoulder hey into a swing
Plenty other bad flow examples
Seth Tepfer, MBA, CSM, PMP (he, him, his)
Senior IT Manager, Emory Primate Center
| | | Book time to meet with me | |
From: Jonathan Sivier via Contra Callers <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 9:48 PM
To: New Contra Callers List <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Subject: [External] [Callers] Re: Choreographic No-Nos I don't agree with your list.
Yes, swings on the first half of a phrase are challenging and I might try to avoid them.
There are dances with this that generally work fine, especially if the caller is aware of
the potential issue and teaches and calls accordingly. The do-si-do across can be a bit
awkward in a crowded line, but only if everyone is doing the do-si-do. If only the
1's or 2's are doing it then there is no problem. Shadow swings seem to be a
personal preference or dislike and not really a choreographic issue. I actually think
that a right chain after a swing can work very well. If you end the swing with the pointy
hands pointing across then the right hands of the right hand dancers are right there ready
to pull by. I suppose you might say there is a momentum change, but that can be very
welcome in a dance where everything seems to be traveling the same way. Not every dance
has to have continuous motion in the same direction all the time. I danced a dance with
that set of figures just last Friday and I was thinking to myself how well it seemed to
work.
So I see #1 and #3 as more of a challenge than a problem. #4 is a personal preference and
#2 seems like a perfectly fine transition between figures.
Jonathan
On 8/5/2024 7:37 PM, Michael Fuerst via Contra Callers wrote:
I am accumulating a list of figures, or figure
sequence that significant dance writers (not necessarily a majority) consider
Choreographic No-Nos
My list so far:
1. do-si-do across
2. right chain after a swing
3 short swings on an odd phrase
4. Shadow swings
Does anyone have further suggestions?
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
--
Elizabeth Bloom Albert
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net