I'm going to respect Rich's request to not discuss the broader topic on
this thread anymore.
I'd be happy to continue the discussion in a separate thread or private
email.
Best regards,
Ron Blechner
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 11:07 AM Donna Hunt <dhuntdancer(a)aol.com> wrote:
Ron: Would you please be more specific? There's
not enough information
here for me to understand what you're claiming, nor to clarify it, and I
find it frustrating and misleading in it's generality.
I'm going to assume that you not only mean callers in these areas but are
also speaking of dances in these specific areas. New England covers
several states and has lots of dances. New York? City or State? How many
dances in Seattle and the Bay Area? How many is "several"? And "these
dances are thriving amidst a decline..."? Without details I cannot
support your claims.
In New England, New York, Seattle, and the Bay Area, many callers have
been examining terminology and changing. Several dance series have gone
genderfree without being specifically chartered as LGBTQ dances. Not
coincidentally, these dances are thriving amidst a decline of attendance of
contra in general.
Donna Hunt
-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Blechner via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
To: Jeffrey Spero <jeff(a)syncopaths.com>
Cc: callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Wed, Mar 28, 2018 12:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Callers] Politically Correct?
Hi Jeff,
I think your understanding of there being "no to little movement" is
inaccurate.
In New England, New York, Seattle, and the Bay Area, many callers have
been examining terminology and changing. Several dance series have gone
genderfree without being specifically chartered as LGBTQ dances. Not
coincidentally, these dances are thriving amidst a decline of attendance of
contra in general.
Many dances are also taking up safety policies before and after the #metoo
movement, despite plenty of resistance for years of some people insisting
that contra is a happy place where there's no harassment.
So yes, you're correct that these discussions have been happening for
years, true, but they have also been producing tangible change in many
places.
...
I might also like to disagree with your implication that everyone is
responsible for "arguing about it". We callers who have swapped terms for
g*pay, for example, have long since moved on.
In the case of this original post, Rich was asking for practical advice,
and there *was no* argument until a couple choice people started throwing
shade at those of us who think changing the lyrics from "she was a young
thing" to "she was a young girl" is an easy swap that doesn't diminish
the
tradition, but also reduces the objectification of women.
In dance,
Ron Blechner