"One of the reasons an ex of mine hated contra dancing was that she'd fully
internalized the step-between-the-feet thing in foxtrot, one step, waltz,
etc, and if you try to do that in a contra swing the results are somewhere
between unsatisfactory and actively dangerous."
I don't swing with feet-between-the-feet with most people, but with some
it's just what feels right, and it can work very well.
Jeff
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 7:00 PM Winston, Alan P. via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Katherine --
I think that the way you were doing the ballroom swing before you modified
it is not how most of the rest of us do it, and that this in itself
produces some of the problems your modification solves.
I'm sure under the impression that the 'standard' ballroom swing [*] has
the robin's arm on top
Here's a video (from the East Coast) whcih sure looks to me (from the West
Coast) like how we do it out here.
https://youtu.be/lQ0R5iHT-l8?si=OYKTgBXg0dLyKQza
(Of course there has to be some adjustment for height difference, and you
don't want a tall person having to bend way forward and then support a
short person or a short person getting their shoulders stretched by
reaching way up; your modification (robin's hand goes on upper arm rather
than shoulder blade) is sometimes the best solution for height differences
even when the default hold is 'standard' as shown in the video.
Please try the 'standard' hold with your husband and see if it's any
better for you that what you were using.. And then we can at least all be
talking about the same thing.
I say "some of the problems" because I think the appropriate solution for
creepy dancers lies in counseling or ejecting them rather than in changing
the hold, because creepy guys gonna creep regardless of the hold. It's
really only a solution for people who are dancing too close for comfort and
don't realize it, and I think the solution for that is for people they are
making uncomfortable to either tell them or tell management and have
management tell them.
I don't see why in either hold anybody should be grabbing you by the
waist. I also think that there's going to be some irreducible minimum of
innocent / unintended boob and butt grazes, especially among unsure dancers
- the chances of a new dancer in a courtesy turn having their
behind-the-back hand in an unexpected place and the other person, trying to
take that hand (which they can't even see, by the way) is going to end up
putting their hand on hip, waist, or butt.; Do you want to change the
courtesy turn hold to avoid that? Because you don't have to interoperate
with other dances, you could change the courtesy turn hold into a
hands-in-front promenade hold and avoid that risk)
On a pedantic note, I've been having trouble understanding the hold before
you posted the picture, because "modified ballroom swing" is, as I recall,
what Larry Jennings ("Zesty Contras", "Give and Take") called what
we've
been calling the ballroom hold because it's a modification of the position
for ballroom dances like waltz and polka, that modification being that the
inside of the feet being square-on to partner, or slightly offset so that
you intentionally step between your partner's feet; when you're in the
ballroom-dance hold, of course to rotate you alternate stepping forward and
stepping backward. Modified to fully offset, you both step forward the
whole time.
(One of the reasons an ex of mine hated contra dancing was that she'd
fully internalized the step-between-the-feet thing in foxtrot, one step,
waltz, etc, and if you try to do that in a contra swing the results are
somewhere between unsatisfactory and actively dangerous.)
Anyway, as a result, the arm that goes to the partner's shoulderblade is
necessarily stretched to some degree across the front of your partner's
body - more stretched if your and your partner's feet are further apart,
less stretched if they're closer together - and it's much easier for that
arm to contact the front of the partner's body somewhere in the boob area
than it is n a square-on ballroom hold.
As far as I can tell -having only fairly-small man boobs - you can manage
to reduce the impact by adjusting the angle at which partners are facing
and how close your the right side of your right foot is to the right side
of theirs. All the stuff that you'd naturally want to do to avoid
unintended forearm-boob interaction is, counterintuitively, unhelpful so
long as you're keeping the shoulder contact - you want to keep your
distance so you keep your feet further away, and that changes the angle,
reducing the clearance between arm and boob. Or you want to pull the
shoulder near the grazed boob back -recoil from the touch, or whatever -
and that also makes it worse because it changes the angle and brings more
boob surface into contact with the arm. Counterintuitively, adjusting
things so that the pointy-end side is farther apart helps by increasing
clearance on the blunt-end side where the boob contact is happening because
it brings you closer to square-on, reducing the arm-boob a
ttack surface.
-- Alan (hoping this doesn't completely come across as mansplaining)
________________________________________
From: Katherine Kitching via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2024 2:27 PM
To: Katherine Kitching
Cc: Jeff Kaufman via Contra Callers
Subject: [Callers] Re: Modified ballroom swing position: seeking more
conversation and info
Sorry everyone - I am clearly not the global authority on this hold, just
yet!! :D
I just tested this out at home with my (life) partner and realized
something unexpected-
In the case of me and my partner dancing, it was actually better for both
of us if his arm went below mine even though he is taller- I guess because
he is taller, his upper arm is also longer, so somehow it still made sense
for my arm to go on top. (If anyone thinks they can better explain the
physics/physiology of this, be my guest!)
Anyhow we got a photo - he is camera-shy and made me crop out his face,
but I think you can view it here - let me know if any issues.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ebotfe2jksbr3dqbjyiuf/Modified-Ballroom-Swin…
Let's call this hold a "work in progress" from us at Halifax Contra
Dances- seems we are still sorting out some details!! :)
Kat K
Katherine Kitching<mailto:kat@outdooractive.ca>
Wednesday, March 13, 2024 6:09 PM
whoops whoops!! sorry, correction on that.
the photo on Jeff's page shows the arms that are closest to the viewer, in
the photo, in a similar position to what my group has been using.
But I just noticed the dancer's other arms are not hand-in-hand, like my
group does it.
Darn :)
We would still have Lark's Left hand in Raven's Right hand.
KK
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net