"I'm not sure where the notion of male/female couples being
'traditional' came from"
I'm very much in favor of anyone being able to dance any role, have
been separated from the person I asked to dance because there weren't
"enough men to go around", dance both roles a similar amount, and
think the long history of same-gender dancing is great. But
opposite-gender dancing is "traditional" in the same sense that almost
everything else we call "traditional" is: because that's how it was
usually done for a long time. That doesn't at all mean we need to
stick with it, as is the case with any tradition, but I don't think
it's useful to push back on people using that phrasing.
Jeff
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 11:15 AM Perry Shafran via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I must say that I am very disappointed to hear that male dancers are still attempting to
forcibly split female couples up so that men don't have to sit out or dance with other
men. We need to figure out whether this desire for these actions is somehow steeped in
"tradition" or whether it is based in some sort of discomfort that some men have
in being in a swing with other men, which some see as some sort of intimate embrace.
One of the things that I have learned that gender free dances do is to create a safe
space for all to dance with people of all genders in both roles. That safety and
inclusiveness is definitely not a hallmark when two women choose to dance with each other
and men are trying to split them up. This shouldn't be happening even if the role
terms are gendered, because we want people to have the ability to dance with the partner
of their choice, regardless of reason.
I think in this era of contra dancing, the mid 2020s, that all people who contra dance
should *expect* to encounter people of the same gender as a neighbor, and act in an
inclusive manner, and that might mean swinging. That's even if they choose to only
dance with people of other genders in the gents role only. Unless your dance is
completely heteronormative in that same-gender dancing is frowned upon, in which case
it's not an inclusive dance because it excludes people who wish to dance either role
for whatever reason.
I'm not sure where the notion of male/female couples being "traditional"
came from, but it totally reminds me of the argument for "traditional" marriage
(meaning one man, one woman) as an excuse to ban same-gender marriages. We need to be
accepting of all forms of coupling on the dance floor if we aim to be an inclusive dance
form.
Perry
On Tuesday, March 12, 2024 at 07:51:02 AM EDT, Louise Siddons via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Colin wrote:
I wasn't going to get involved in all this, but I have to side with Ken Panton -
I'm a man and I certainly prefer
dancing with women. And I very much enjoy dancing with Louise Siddons even though she
may generally have a different preference.
It always surprises me when people bring sexuality into this conversation, even though at
this point I should know better. I enjoy dancing with Colin, just as I enjoy dancing with
anyone who is a good dancer (or making a good-faith effort, or having a tonne of fun) and
an interesting, kind, thoughtful human being, and I am pleased that we are friends both on
and off the dance floor. When he (or anyone) asks me to dance, my first thought is not “oh
good, I'm sexually attracted to this person” — it’s “oh good, this will be fun!”
Recently at a contra dance I was separated from my partner, a woman, by two men who
didn’t want to dance with each other and perceived my partner and I as acceptable
alternatives. I was visibly upset by it and declined to dance at all; I am not a
commodity). One of the men came over afterwards to apologise (as did my partner; older
than me and not in her home community, I think she felt more social pressure to accede).
He explained that he knew how I felt because he “has a daughter like you” — meaning,
lesbian. I explained back to him that I wasn’t upset because I’m a lesbian, I was upset
because I had asked someone to dance, they had accepted, and that agreement had been
disregarded in deference to two men’s discomfort. To be honest, I am squicked out by the
idea that someone looks at me dancing with another person and thinks first of my sexuality
— that’s a creepy worldview in the context of contra dancing.
There are dance communities determined to hold onto a heterocentric model, and that’s
their choice — but we are, as a society, attempting to heal from a long — but ultimately
quite recent — history of toxic gender models and so I think it’s a bad choice. Men being
afraid or disgusted to touch other men is a social illness, not something to preserve or
protect. Based on people’s comments in this discussion, gender-free dance communities
understand, consciously or otherwise, that contra dance is a collective enterprise, that
we are all dancing with each other, and that the community is healthier when it doesn’t
put limits around how that happens. Friends can dance with each other — yes, even if
they’re men! — and family members, and strangers, and lovers can all dance with each
other, and they can bring different aspects of themselves to every interaction within the
dance, whether with partner or neighbour.
Louise.
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net