Re: [Callers] voting people up

The reason I didn't like the idea is because I'm against voting, which I think would prejudice readers toward a post based on its author as opposed to considering the content of the post. The best way to honor respected folks in an open forum is simply to feel respect toward them(and reply if you feel so moved), not to make their soapboxes taller than everyone else's. I don't want to filter out a voice just because it's seldom heard and therefore slower to gather points. If the less-voted-for get filtered out, how would anyone besides the favored few ever be able to gain votes? Chip Hedler Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:40:52 -0500 From: Lindsay Morris &lt;lindsay(a)tsmworks.com&gt; To: "Caller's discussion list" &lt;callers(a)sharedweight.net&gt; Subject: Re: [Callers] Forum vs email list? Message-ID: < CAGNhc2Lm5iMA_fX3o9_2KZ2mJXFiVWdGb-G-0njNGFia02Fd6g(a)mail.gmail.com&gt; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Today its 29 hate-the-idea, 7 like-it, 7 not sure. I'll let it go. Really, all I wanted was a way we could vote people up, so we could give more weight to the opinions of the especially respected folks here (and filter the email flood down to just those people). I wonder if there's any other way to do that? -------------------- Lindsay Morris CEO, TSMworks Tel. 1-859-539-9900 lindsay(a)tsmworks.com _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)sharedweight.net http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers