4 Jan
2013
4 Jan
'13
3:49 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013, Kalia Kliban wrote:
On 1/3/2013 8:21 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
My point/snark was that using "we" as Alan did implies a kind of
agreement that I think is vastly overgeneralizing here. As I wrote in
the part of my post you elided, this has long been a source of tension
across multiple dance communities, I'd bet it probably goes back hundreds
or thousands of years.
Your point about people disrupting the dance with flourishes is
appropriate, but I don't think that making grandiose statements about
community attitudes toward flourishes helps any.
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013, Alan Winston wrote:
I'm one of them. It's possible to flourish responsibly, but that is
often not the case. [...]
I don't think you need this for the argument; there were flourishes
when I started contra dancing in 1985 (but we called the people who
did them "hot-doggers" and complained about them).
Which "we" are you talking about?