5 Feb
2025
5 Feb
'25
9:19 p.m.
Thank you everyone! This was very helpful :)
On 04/02/2025 16:04, Michael Dyck via Contra Callers wrote:
On 2025-02-04 1:14 p.m., Colin Hume via Contra Callers
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 09:19:43 -0500, Michael Dyck
via Contra Callers wrote:
No, I'm not assuming that at all. (I'm quite aware of the distinction.)
The original message didn't say "waltz time", it said "waltzing
somehow",
which to me sounds like the dance-form, not the time signature.
-Michael
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net I don't think waltzing would fit very well in
that formation.
If two in each threesome are waltzing, that leaves out the third.
You're assuming that a dance in waltz time involves rotating with a ballroom hold