I occasionally teach but don’t call, so I don’t have cards—there are GF ECD callers on the
list who may have more to add.
First, a lot of ECDs are written without any reference to gender anyway—the dances often
just work like that.
An example of a conversion: Fried de Metz Herman’s The Archbishop (a 4-couple set dance)
begins
First man and fourth woman cast L one place
which becomes
Long first diagonals cast L one place
Three words instead of five, it references a twosome rather than two individuals, and
places them in a context, better (I’d argue) showing the pattern of the whole dance. And
imagine calling using the original version.
(btw, I’m looking at someone else’s description of the dance—I don’t know how Fried wrote
it. But someone is describing it the first way.)
Read Weaver
Jamaica Plain, MA
http://lcfd.org
On Feb 13, 2017, at 10:30 AM, Aahz via Callers
<callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017, Read Weaver via Callers wrote:
As far as I know, all of the ongoing gender-free English country
dances use a different system, "global terminology." It's based on
current position rather than role, and so doesn't have to use a
substitute for gents/ladies. There are a small number of dances for
which it's awkward, though I've had callers present me with something
they couldn't figure out the global terminology for and I've usually
been able to, usually resulting in easier teaching and calling than
the gendered version. There was one ongoing contra dance decades ago
that used a similar system.
You have any examples? Both the original and the converted version?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
http://rule6.info/
<*> <*> <*>
Help a hearing-impaired person:
http://rule6.info/hearing.html
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net