This question boils down, to me, to the question of "How much different
does a dance need to be to be considered a new dance rather than a
variation of an existing dance?"
I've heard the 25% guideline. (So 8 measures for a 32 measure dance.) But
it's obviously not that simple. If I flip the A and B of many dances,
they're danceable but clearly not new dances, just variations.
What are your thoughts on what makes a dance "new" vs "variation"?
-Ron T Blechner
(As for the database, having a way to tag that other callers have
successfully called it would add legitimacy.)
On Jul 30, 2014 3:40 AM, "Michael Fuerst via Callers" <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Who will decide what dances merit placement in the database?
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net