Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume

I would subscribe.  Although I'm pretty sure that nearly everyone on the callers list would be on the choreography list so the volume of mail would stay the same.  And since knowing choreography is an important part of being a caller that I would think that one list would suffice.  Volume doesn't really bother me - the more info the better! Perry --- On Wed, 5/9/12, Chris Weiler (home) <chris.weiler(a)weirdtable.org> wrote: From: Chris Weiler (home) <chris.weiler(a)weirdtable.org> Subject: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume To: "Shared Weight" <callers(a)sharedweight.net> Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 3:23 PM Hello SW callers, I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers list volume is getting too heavy for some people. So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_ subscribe to a choreography list? Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio? Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's just lurking. Chris Weiler Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator. Craftsbury, VT _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)sharedweight.net http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers