I happened to play on Saturday night for Queer Contra Chicago, a dance
series that prefers to use bands/ bares. I've called for that series as
well.
Two things stood out: The first is that during the workshop someone asked
the caller if he'd heard the larks/ ravens terminology, and said they
thought it was easier to remember larks = left, ravens = right.
The second is that every time the caller said "bands," in addressing the
floor, I jumped, because I thought he was talking to the musicians and I
had missed something. I wouldn't have noticed that as a caller, I think.
For what it's worth....
Meg
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 7:28 AM Delia Clark via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I have informally polled some members of my band and
they prefer
gems/rubies to jets/rubies, for all the reasons others have stated, so I’m
going to take that out for a test drive at the upcoming wedding I’m calling
for two women. If I gain any more insights from that, I’ll share them here!
On Jun 1, 2015, at 2:25 AM, Erik Hoffman via Callers <
callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
It's funny, but there's a part of me that finds all of these different
words a little weird. In a way, I'm not sure I like any of them. But I do
like the sense of liberation they give -- the level of comfort that's
appearing at dances for people dancing with anyone. In my area, the SF Bay
Area, men are definitely getting more comfortable dancing with men. Around
here -- as opposed to outlying areas -- there has always been a level of
tolerance, but the level of acceptance is growing.
I think my sense of weirdness -- slight discomfort -- comes from both
working to change my habits, and from the sense of the terms being
contrived. OK, my thought/feelings are changing, and my mind is starting to
think of this use as being creative rather than contrived. Also, use is
working in my favor: the more I call using Larks and Ravens, the more
comfortable it's getting for me, and I'm feeling it's less
"contrived." But
it has been a bit of a hurdle for me to overcome.
As for liking jets & rubies, I have the same problem many do: the multiple
meaning of the word "jet." OK, I can be told it's a jem, but a machine to
fly, developed by the military, designed for aggressive fighting, then
given to the public for high-carbon footprint travel is my first thought --
extremely masculine.
Second thought that comes to an old geezer like me is a gang in New York's
West Side, about which there is a story, which is also masculine...
Jet as a gem would be slow to replace the other two. So, were I to try
these, I'd go for gems & rubies. But we'll stick with Larks & Ravens for
a
while...
~erik hoffman
oakland, ca
On 5/28/2015 12:30 PM, Ron Blechner via Callers wrote:
For those interested in gender free contra dance terms:
1. Do you like or dislike jets / rubies ?
2. How would gems / rubies compare?
In dance,
Ron Blechner
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing
listCallers@lists.sharedweight.nethttp://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>
Delia Clark
PO Box 45
Taftsville, VT 05073
802-457-2075
deliaclark8(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net