Kalia asked:
If Taco Bell can get legal protection for
rearrangements of the same 6
ingredients in new orders, why not contra dances?
I am not a lawyer either but I suspect that Taco Bell could receive
protection for the name of the dish, their advertising slogan,
descriptions, and photos of the dish. They might even get protection for
the artistic "look" of the dish. They surely could not copyright a list of
the ingredients nor the recipe for assembling them.
My understanding is that you have the rights to the name of your dance, the
teaching notes included with the notation, and possibly the layout of the
dance notes on a page. You could also copyright any commentary you write
and any photos or videos of the dance being called or danced.
If another caller, however, uses a different set of words to call that
sequence of figures and does not mention you as the author or the name you
have assigned to the dance...I'm not sure you can protect the specific
sequence of movements that make up the choreography.
Personally, I am always honored if someone calls a dance I wrote. I don't
feel a need to be credited for the dance, particularly at the time the
dance is called. If I do a good job of choreographing a dance, then I see
it, really, as the property of the dancers. The wisdom of the crowd is
what makes a dance that works. I only assemble the sequence.
But I recognize that some choreographers may feel more "ownership" of the
dance. I don't want to call those dances. I would like to know if a dance
is "owned" by a specific person so that I can avoid calling it.
I think the best dances are embraced by the folk process and will evolve as
the dance is passed through the community. No one "owns" those dances.
They are being re-created with each generation of dancers. This
traditional dance form is a collaborative process.
- Greg McKenzie
West Coast, USA
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Kalia Kliban <kalia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 1:59 PM, Jeff Kaufman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Erik Hoffman <erik(a)erikhoffman.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I published it ... only to find out later that Tony Parkes had
>>> written the same dance -- for the same reason -- with the
>>> variant of a B1 Half Promenade; Women Chain. ... Later I
>>> found the same dance with the Right & Left Through, in
>>> another book by a Lucille ...
>>>
>>
>> This is part of why I'm skeptical that a contra dance would be
>> original enough to qualify for copyright protection: people keep
>> coming up with the same dances independently.
>>
>
If Taco Bell can get legal protection for
rearrangements of the same 6
ingredients in new orders, why not contra dances?
> Kalia
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<http://www.shared…
>