John wrote:
1) If you implicitly condone it by saying nothing,
then others will copy
it and it will spread even more.
Just a few thoughts:
- The above statement, ironically, was probably said--in some form--by
religious "leaders" in colonial America who devoted much effort to stamping
out social dance altogether as a provocative corruption of the morals of
the common folk. Those "leaders" failed.
- In the art of dance "saying nothing" is often the best tactic. Words are
so cumbersome when teaching psychomotor skills. The words tend to gum up
the work.
- This is, we hope, a free country. If any "leader" tells folks to stop
doing some thing that those folks want to do, it is likely that those folks
will find another "leader" who will allow it. The nay-saying "leader"
is
likely to end up with an empty, or near-empty hall. That is as it should
be.
- Folk arts are, after all, the province of the folks. They are the final
arbitrators of what is "correct." The best "folk leaders" are those
who
recognize this and who have faith in the ability of the folk to evolve
their own tradition.
Greg McKenzie
West Coast, USA