11 Mar
2024
11 Mar
'24
10:13 p.m.
The point is that if you announce it loudly, then you're making it gender
free in name only. If larks is just code for gents, then people who want to
dance a role that doesn't match their gender expression or identity (or who
are non-binary for that matter) will be more uncomfortable than if the
dance is truly gender free. You announce it quietly not because it's
shameful to have a preference, but because it's shaming the people who
don't match if you announce it loudly.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 5:56 PM Colin Hume via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 10:52:25 -0400, K P via Contra
Callers wrote:
Am I the only living person who has a preference
for dancing with the
opposite cisgender (realizing that any
particular, such opposite, cisgendered individual
may, in fact, have a
different preference)?
I wasn't going to get involved in all this, but I have to side with Ken
Panton - I'm a man and I certainly prefer
dancing with women. And I very much enjoy dancing with Louise Siddons
even though she may generally have a different
preference.
Colin Hume
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net