On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:07:55 -0500, Andrea Nettleton wrote:
Wow. You guys are so mathematical. I do this totally
on instinct.
But then, I am much newer at this, so maybe this
calculation is
something I should be doing more analytically.
No you shouldn't - I totally agree that you watch the floor and
decide how and when to drop out - there isn't any magic number.
I may be the caller at Pinewoods that Martha Edwards mentioned who
"had a policy of not coming back in - he would just let the lines
break down". I think the caller's job is to teach the dance - and the
dancers' job is to learn the dance. OK, if it's a complicated
three-figure Pat Shaw dance I may be calling solidly all the way
through, but I think a lot of callers spoon-feed the dancers and never
give them a chance to find out what they can do - or indeed to hear
the music and dance to that rather than the caller's voice. If one or
two people go wrong, the other dancers will be pleased to sort them
out - and they'll get it right the next time and feel pleased with
themselves. Of course if half the room is in chaos I'll start calling
again - but please give things a chance to sort themselves out first!
Colin Hume
Email colin(a)colinhume.com Web site
http://www.colinhume.com