Donald wrote:
The strategies listed below all seem like "after
the fact" moves that
happen after partner choices are made. Just because the last dance
had more beats of neighbor swing doesn't mean the next will, unless
you tell them that's what's coming up.
Thank you Donald for your comment. Good point!
Just above where you cut my email is where I emphasized how essential it is
for the caller to take full responsibility for the situation. If the
caller takes ownership of the problem then she will assume that it was her
calling that caused the problem in the first place. (The caller cannot
control who shows up at the dance, but she can take responsibility for how
both she and the dancers respond to the situation.)
Building the confidence of the dancers in the caller cannot be done with a
few words. Dancers are smart. They are also skeptical...and have good
reason to be. The caller must *prove *that she can make the dancing fun no
matter who you partner with or where you dance in the hall.
Yes. It would be better to call precisely, using effective word order,
from the first words into the mike. This is why this problem gets at the
heart of what good contra dance calling is about. The best solutions are
proactive and the caller ought to be doing most of these things all along.
Shortening the dance slots will tend to "speed up" the evening and create a
sense of increased opportunities. I always try to keep the first few dance
slots as short as possible, even if there is no gender imbalance. I don't
do longer slots until later in the evening.
My approach is to assume that the regulars will want to take on leadership
and step up to address the situation. My job is to make that effort easy
and fun. Gender imbalances are a common problem. The situation can change
dramatically in one or two dance slots. If the caller does her job well
the sidelined dancers are more likely to think, "Well, at least things seem
to be moving along well and this is a fun dance. Maybe I'll stick around
and get to dance the next one."
We need to have confidence in the dance community. Their enjoyment and
success are enhanced when everyone is included. That's part of the joy of
community dancing.
- Greg McKenzie
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Greg McKenzie <grekenzie(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
- Call easy dances (this will make sure everyone
can succeed and they
will
not worry about failing because they have an
inexperienced partner. This
builds confidence in all of the dancers.)
- Call dances with more beats of neighbor swinging, and less beats of
partner swinging. Consider calling a "no partner swing" dance. (This
will
create the feeling that the choice of a
"partner" is less critical to
having a good time.)
- Call with short walk-throughs and quit calling
soon after beginning.
(Increases dancer confidence.)
- Cut the dance slots as short as possible. (Short dance slots will
create
the feeling that there are lots more partnering
opportunities to come and
more dancers will feel more generous in their partnering decisions. In
reality, the caller has to work very hard to allow for even one more
dance
slot in an evening. But shorter dance slots will
encourage a sense of
more
partnering opportunities nonetheless. The
dancers will sense that the
danger of being "stuck" with a "bad" partner for a long slot is less
of
an
issue.)
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers