Send Callers mailing list submissions to
 	callers(a)sharedweight.net
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 	
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 	callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
 You can reach the person managing the list at
 	callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
 Today's Topics:
    1. looking for "Mad Robin in Love" (Deborah Comly)
    2. Re: Callers Digest, Vol 83, Issue 7 (Dennis Merritt)
    3. Head Mikes and Mike Heads (Greg McKenzie)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Message: 1
 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:15:12 -0700
 From: Deborah Comly <debcomly(a)gmail.com>
 To: "Caller's discussion list" <Callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: [Callers] looking for "Mad Robin in Love"
 Message-ID:
 	<CAC1TBK2Tziyxh=kpGFRL1PFUgekZD=xETteQnDZcO15LJ7F=Pg(a)mail.gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Hi I am looking for a dance, "Mad Robin in Love," by Greg Frock.
 Thanks!  Deb
 -- 
 Deb Comly
 Flagstaff, AZ
 ------------------------------
 Message: 2
 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:48:32 -0400
 From: Dennis Merritt <dennismerritt1(a)gmail.com>
 To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Callers Digest, Vol 83, Issue 7
 Message-ID:
 	<CAAn1myVRDUeh9ZS_YRXFHcF_7W7k+k=WEVSoe-ifC93OUZdbJA(a)mail.gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 I've taught many beginning ladies how to keep a strong dance frame,  
 how to
 use it to regulate the degree of closeness with whoever is swinging  
 them.
  It seemed to me simple for women to learn how to deal with men  
 that try to
 hold them too close.
 And then I started dancing the woman's role from time to time, and  
 in one
 dance in particular, there was a shadow swing, and my shadow was a  
 larger
 man, probably with issues, uncomfortable with a man dancing the  
 woman's
 role, and he grabbed me tight and got all romantic, as a joke?, but  
 it was
 very uncomfortable to me, and he was larger than me, and I couldn't  
 get
 extracted, and didn't say anything, and felt I understood...
 Dennis
 On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:47 PM, <callers-request(a)sharedweight.net>  
 wrote:
  Send Callers mailing list submissions to
        callers(a)sharedweight.net
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
 You can reach the person managing the list at
        callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
 Today's Topics:
   1. Re: mental health and dance calling (Amy Cann)
   2. Re: mental health and dance calling (Bree Kalb)
   3. Re: mental health and dance calling (Amy Cann)
   4. Re: mental health and dance calling (Martha Edwards)
   5. Re: unwelcome behavior (Martha Edwards)
   6. alternate formations (Richard Mckeever)
   7. Re: alternate formations (Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing)
 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 -
 Message: 1
 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 12:03:17 -0400
 From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org
  
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: Re: [Callers] mental health and dance
calling
 Message-ID:
        <CALZWU+t7PGH_zRxzfR 
 +tUy2=DJHrFtrpxkm=w4CC9Hvk0Focsg(a)mail.gmail.com
  
 Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
 It's funny, I'm listening to all of these stories and thinking  
 about the
 creepers I've run into over the years, and I'm thinking to myself:
 "Well, it's really quite simple, isn't it? Ladies, if a gent is being
 inappropriate, walk away!
 Just wait until you're out at the top or bottom, turn to him and  
 say 'I am
 uncomfortable with what you are doing and am not going to finish  
 this dance
 with you' -- and then do it. Walk off. And if he's really  
 offensive, don't
 wait until the end, bail out right then and there. The world won't  
 end if a
 line of dancers has to cope with a hole. What's more important,  
 ten more
 minutes of perfect dancing for that line, at that dance, or a  
 really good
 behavior-modification moment that will actually improve the dance  
 community
 more in the long run?"
 And yet it isn't that simple, is it? We don't do it. We have these  
 halls
 just filled with women who are about as uniformly
 modern/educated/self-actuated/socially conscious/feminist as it  
 gets, who
 spend our days running businesses or doing high end IT/research  
 --  or
 teaching children or counseling teens or lobbying to pass laws on  
 issues
 just like this -- and not once in my experience have I ever known  
 a woman
 to
 say "Nope, enough, not going to let you do this."
 Heck, I've marched eighth grade boys (and girls) off the  
 playground for
 inappropriate behavior without a flinch, but at a dance, when it's  
 *me?
 *I've
 been groped and dipped and clenched a few times over the years and  
 the most
 overt thing I've ever done is reached back, grabbed his hand,  
 moved it up
 about six inches to the small of my back, and said "works much  
 better for
 me
 if you keep your hand *there". *The other times, I've simply  
 become ice
 cold/distant and stopped making eye contact - which can be quite the
 putdown
 if you really work it, smile and nod at all of your neighbors but  
 shut down
 completely every time you return to your partner. But have I truly  
 called
 them out on it? No. And neither have any of my peers.
 Food for thought.
 ------------------------------
 Message: 2
 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:15:09 -0400
 From: "Bree Kalb" <bree(a)mindspring.com
  
 To: "Caller's discussion list"
<callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: Re:
[Callers] mental health and dance calling
 Message-ID: <36DF3156E5FA448B88FBF5C1106D581C@BreeHomeLaptop
  
 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original
 Amy wrote: But have I truly called
 them out on it? No. And neither have any of my peers.
 I have.
 Now that I'm older, it doesn't happen as often, but still does
 occasionally.
 I've put my left palm against a man's shoulder and pushed him  
 back, saying:
 "I don't want to dance that close.' Or: "I don't sleaze
dance."  
 The next
 time they've asked me to dance,  I've said "I'll only dance with  
 you again
 if you don't (do that particular thing again.)" They've always  
 agreed and
 behaved themselves, for that dance. When I come to them in the  
 line, I
 automatically push them back a little. But I know I'm an  
 exception; the
 younger, shyer women don't feel comfortable setting limits. Even  
 someone
 like Amy (who I surmise is not particularly shy) is uneasy being  
 so bold.
 So it's important that the organizers pay attention and act. Our  
 board
 actually banned a guy from dancing because he was preying on  
 teenage girls;
 other dance organizers in the area followed suit.
 Bree Kalb
 Carrboro
 ------------------------------
 Message: 3
 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 13:27:09 -0400
 From: Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org
  
To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: Re: [Callers] mental health and dance
calling
 Message-ID:
        <CALZWU+s=JBRxuF8ZvN6_vwBDE 
 +iQ6D6q_8727TRiseZ8CvNS9Q(a)mail.gmail.com
  
 Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
 I'll bet this discussion is going to continue for a bit, so let's  
 clarify:
 I've ALWAYS made people stop what they are doing -- made them  
 leave more
 room, move a hand -- I've just always done it non-verbally. If I  
 don't want
 to be dipped, I don't get dipped -- I can shift my weight or go  
 inert in
 ways that make it impossible. I'm not shy about taking care of  
 myself, and
 that cold/silent treatment is pretty darn harsh/unmistakable (just  
 ask my
 husband :)
 But on reflection, it's always been a private interchange. By  
 "calling
 out",
 I mean it in the most specific way: calling them out from the  
 crowd, into
 the spotlight, to be addressed in front of an audience. I've very  
 rarely
 seen this happen, and have never heard of a woman walking off the  
 floor
 mid-dance.
 On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Bree Kalb <bree(a)mindspring.com>  
 wrote:
> Amy wrote: But have I truly called
  
> them out on it? No. And neither have
any of my peers.
  
> I have.
> Now that I'm older, it doesn't happen as often, but still does
> occasionally.
> I've put my left palm against a man's shoulder and pushed him back,
 saying:
  "I don't want to dance that close.'
Or: "I don't sleaze dance."  
 The next
 time they've asked me to dance,  I've said "I'll only dance with you
 again
  if you don't (do that particular thing
again.)" They've always  
 agreed and
 behaved themselves, for that dance. When I come to them in the  
 line, I
 automatically push them back a little. But I know I'm an  
 exception; the
 younger, shyer women don't feel comfortable setting limits. Even  
 someone
 like Amy (who I surmise is not particularly shy) is uneasy being  
 so bold. 
 So
  it's important that the organizers pay
attention and act. Our board 
 actually
> banned a guy from dancing because he was preying on teenage  
> girls; other
> dance organizers in the area followed suit.
  
> Bree Kalb
> Carrboro
> ______________________________**_________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> 
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<
 http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers  
  
 ------------------------------
 Message: 4
 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:32:07 -0500
 From: Martha Edwards <meedwards(a)westendweb.com
 
 To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: Re: [Callers] mental health and dance
calling
 Message-ID:
        <CAJjmMcPtmmmmaO5KSLND- 
 SEw3Bop2YQADhO2w7xSqtCsQNG=yA(a)mail.gmail.com
  
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 Good points, all, as usual.
 The more difficult problem is how to keep the creeps from behaving  
 that way
 with younger, or newer, dancers, who don't know yet what sort of  
 atmosphere
 we generally maintain, and are reluctant to "cause a scene".  
 Mostly, I
 think, if it's too bad, they just go away, never to return and  
 find out
 that
 99% of dancers would never think of acting that way.
 So, when we tell these folks a direct "NO" (and we should, oh yes, we
 should!) we can do those dancers a favor and tell the creeps  
 exactly what
 they did that was offensive. Tell them what they did and how you  
 feel about
 it. And tell a trustworthy board member.
 I admit I haven't always been direct with people on my own behalf  
 - I just
 get away and move on. Oddly, I'm much more comfortable speaking to  
 these
 folks on behalf of others. No fear. Wonder what that's about.
 M
 E
 On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Amy Cann <acann(a)putneyschool.org>  
 wrote:
  I'll bet this discussion is going to continue
for a bit, so let's 
 clarify:
  
> I've ALWAYS made people stop what
they are doing -- made them  
> leave more
> room, move a hand -- I've just always done it non-verbally. If I  
> don't
 want
  to be dipped, I don't get dipped -- I can
shift my weight or go  
 inert in
 ways that make it impossible. I'm not shy about taking care of  
 myself, 
 and
> that cold/silent treatment is pretty darn harsh/unmistakable  
> (just ask my
> husband :)
  
> But on reflection, it's always
been a private interchange. By  
> "calling
> out",
> I mean it in the most specific way: calling them out from the  
> crowd, into
> the spotlight, to be addressed in front of an audience. I've very  
> rarely
> seen this happen, and have never heard of a woman walking off the  
> floor
> mid-dance.
  
 
  
  
  
> On Sat, Jul 9,
2011 at 1:15 PM, Bree Kalb <bree(a)mindspring.com>  
> wrote:
  
>> Amy wrote: But have I truly
called
>
  
>> them out on it? No. And
neither have any of my peers.
>
  
>> I have.
>> Now that I'm older, it doesn't happen as often, but still does
>> occasionally.
>> I've put my left palm against a man's shoulder and pushed him back,
> saying:
>> "I don't want to dance that close.' Or: "I don't sleaze
dance." The
 next
   time
they've asked me to dance,  I've said "I'll only dance with  
 you 
 again
> if you don't (do that particular thing again.)" They've always  
> agreed 
  and
 > behaved themselves, for that dance. When I
come to them in the  
> line, I
> automatically push them back a little. But I know I'm an  
> exception; the
> younger, shyer women don't feel comfortable setting limits. Even 
 someone
 > like Amy (who I surmise is not particularly
shy) is uneasy being so 
 bold.
> So
>
  it's important that the organizers pay
attention and act. Our board 
> actually
>> banned a guy from dancing because he was preying on teenage girls;
 other
>> dance organizers in the area followed suit.
>
  
>> Bree Kalb
>> Carrboro
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>> 
http://www.sharedweight.net/**mailman/listinfo/callers<
> 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers  
>
  
>
_______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
  
 --
 As you set out for Ithaka, pray that your journey be long, full of
 adventure, full of discovery...
 May there be many summer mornings when, with what pleasure, with  
 what joy,
 you enter harbors you're seeing for the first time.
 ~Constantine Cavafy, "Ithaka" 1911
 ------------------------------
 Message: 5
 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:09:25 -0500
 From: Martha Edwards <meedwards(a)westendweb.com
 
 To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: Re: [Callers] unwelcome behavior
 Message-ID:
         
 <CAJjmMcPMteUijM5uawWOCauvUZvwJGJVL05Dkkca=Bb6j9pssg(a)mail.gmail.com
  
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
 Here, it's easy. We don't allow lifting people off the floor.
 We have one person with a very mild mental illness who wasn't  
 judging very
 well when to do it and when not, and wasn't always doing it  
 safely, so we
 just made it a rule, not to be broken, that no one does it, to  
 make it
 easier for him to remember.
 We also have a board member who loves doing aerials, does them  
 with safety
 and with permission and all other good stuff, but he can't do it  
 at our
 dances either, just because the hard-and-fast rule is the only way  
 we can
 keep the rest of us from being cut off at the knees when the other  
 guy was
 swinging new dancers off their feet and their legs cut a six-foot  
 circle
 sweep.
 I also saw a caller in Kansas City stop a dance once and tell a
 particularly
 aggressive dancer to stop lifting people off the ground. "I have  
 liability
 here, and I'm not going to continue calling if you keep doing  
 that."  I
 think the dancers applauded.
 I had the pleasure of meeting Frankie Manning, who invented the  
 aerial in
 swing dancing in 1935, and was particularly impressed with the  
 amount of
 practice he and his partner did before they ever tried it on a  
 dance floor
 -
 with mattresses covering the floor of his living room while they  
 learned
 how.
 M
 E
 On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Greg McKenzie <grekenzie(a)gmail.com
  
 wrote:
  
 
> I would love to hear how other dance communities have dealt with  
> this
> issue.
  
> - Greg McKenzie
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
  
 ------------------------------
 Message: 6
 Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 14:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Richard Mckeever <macmck(a)ymail.com
 
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: [Callers] alternate formations
 Message-ID:
        <1310245961.53389.YahooMailNeo(a)web120406.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
  
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Here is a new topic...
 Recently I have noticed that many of the programs presented have  
 consisted
 solely of duple improper contras with a couple Becket dances  
 thrown in for
 variety.
 I would be interesting to hear how other callers incorporate other
 formations in their programs and how they and the dancer feel  
 about it
 This would include - but not be limited to:
 circles dances
 Sicilian circles
 Squares
 4 facing 4
 triple minors
 scatter mixers
 other??
 Comments by formation would be interesting as would regional  
 variations in
 programming
 Mac McKeever
 St Louis
 ------------------------------
 Message: 7
 Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 15:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing
        <winston(a)slac.stanford.edu
  
 To:
Richard Mckeever <macmck(a)ymail.com
  
 Cc:
Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net
  
 Subject: Re: [Callers] alternate formations
 Message-ID: <01O3G5YHDG8WBPO4IB(a)SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
  
 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii
 Mac asked about how other callerrs incorporate other formations  
 into their
 programs.
 I call English (for 25+ years), barn dances, historical-themed
 (Regency/Early
 American, Civil War, Dickens) and contra (for the last five or so  
 years,
 but
 only a few times a year).
 My answers are different for each kind of thing.
 For English, I typically call more duple minor (usually proper) than
 anything
 else, but try to mix it up with small-set dances (two-couple set,
 three-couple
 set, squares) and a triple minor or two in an evening.  Since  
 tunes go with
 particular dances, I also consider variety in mood, key, meter,  
 and tempo
 when
 I'm making up the program.  (I'll also use what I know about the  
 musicians
 I
 have that night and try to keep away from notey reels for a  
 fiddler with
 tendinitis, bias toward Bb tunes if I have a cello player, etc.)
 For barn dances, anything goes.  Sicilians, threesome Sicilians, big
 circles,
 grand march, circle mixer, whatever.
 For historically-themed, it depends somewhat on what I can justify
 historically,  so Regency has lots of longways duples and some  
 triples,
 mixed
 with an occasional three-couple set (adapted from a triple minor,  
 like
 Fandango, Prince William, etc), interspersed with waltzes.
 For Civil War / Victorian, Sicilians, threesome Sicilians, whole  
 sets  in
 longways formation (Gothic Dance, Virginia Reel/Roger de  
 Coverley), mixed
 up
 with waltzes, polkas, schottisches and galops.
 Around here (SF Bay Area) if you do a whole evening of duple-minor  
 improper
 contras at a contra dance, nobody complains about it.  Some  
 callers like to
 include a square or two in an evening.  A noticeable number of  
 people will
 sit
 down if they realize it's a square.  (As a dancer, I've had a  
 partner bail
 on
 me when she realized it was a square.)  That doesn't happen as  
 much at
 local
 weekend or week-long camps, but at regular dances with local  
 callers, 10%
 or
 more of the people who'd be up for a contra sit down for a  
 square.  I'm not
 the
 miracle square dance caller who's going to change their minds  
 about it,
 either,
 so I don't program squares.
 When I first started calling contras here, my ten-dance program  
 might have
 a
 circle mixer in slot three and a triplet sometime after the  
 break.  I've
 had
 complaints relayed to me about calling 'gimmicky' dances, and I  
 wasn't
 getting
 great response from the triplets, so I've dropped those.  I want  
 to get
 invited
 back to call again, and I don't need to change everybody's mind  
 about what
 a
 good time is.
 My most recent program (a very successful outing in Monterey last  
 month)
 had a
 circle mixer in slot three (setting the ground for the poussette  
 figure I
 used
 in "Joyride" later) and a four-face-four right after the break,  
 and I got
 positive response to both of those.  (The music was great; if it  
 weren't I
 could have had the best program in the world and it wouldn't have  
 been a
 wonderful evening.)
 -- Alan
 --
 ===================================================================== 
 ==========
  Alan Winston --- WINSTON(a)SSRL.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU
  Disclaimer: I speak only for myself, not SLAC or SSRL   Phone:
 650/926-3056
  Paper mail to: SSRL -- SLAC BIN 99, 2575 Sand Hill Rd, Menlo Park CA
 94025
 ===================================================================== 
 ==========
 ------------------------------
 _______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
 End of Callers Digest, Vol 83, Issue 7
 **************************************
 
 ------------------------------
 Message: 3
 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 07:36:32 -0700
 From: Greg McKenzie <grekenzie(a)gmail.com>
 To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: [Callers] Head Mikes and Mike Heads
 Message-ID:
 	<CAFqkWLuYAUE5e1qyv7f5ae9z1dWa2GCf1Q5ZLR3FfWG1Kssp8Q(a)mail.gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Martha Wild <mawild(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
  Well, I love a headset mike. I don't have a
loud voice, and no  
 amount of
 voice training is going to give me one. If there are more than a few
 newcomers, and a small number of people in the hall talking, I  
 will be
 hoarse by the time I finish the beginners workshop without a  
 headset mike.
 
 I don't know what kind of voice training you have had.  It  
 certainly is
 possible to learn how increase your volume without causing  
 additional stress
 on your voice.   That, however, misses the whole point.  Volume is  
 just one
 tool we can use as masters-of-ceremony, but it is a poor substitute  
 for
 learning how to earn and hold the attention of a crowd.
 Learning how to earn and hold attention is a core calling skill.   
 Cranking
 up the volume and bludgeoning the crowd into submission with higher  
 decibels
 is all too common at all kinds of events using a PA system.  On its  
 own this
 tactic naturally results in a much higher noise level in the room and
 increased stress for everyone.  This kind of thing can make you  
 tired just
 by being in the room.  Fortunately, most good callers have learned  
 that this
 tactic has major pitfalls.  Those with naturally loud voices are  
 usually the
 worst offenders because they have learned to shout down competition  
 and
 dominate the sound space.  This is a poor communication strategy.   
 It can be
 effective in the moment but over the course of the evening the  
 caller loses
 the respect of the dancers.
 Excellent callers know how to manage the communication process.   
 Who are you
 competing with for attention and why?  Is there some way to  
 accommodate the
 other communication processes going on?  How do you pace the  
 evening to give
 everyone a chance to communicate easily?  A large part of the  
 reason people
 attend social events is to talk, and isn't it the caller's job to
 accommodate that?  Do you provide cues and time to allow dancers to
 transition gracefully from social talking to a walk-through?  Do  
 you work
 with the band to provide clear transitions to gather folks into the  
 hall or
 to switch from socializing to listening?  Does the band understand  
 when to
 remain quiet themselves?  Do you start with instructions that require
 physical movement of the dancers?  Is it clear to the dancers that  
 listening
 to the caller is the quickest and most effective way that they can  
 achieve
 their own personal goals?  Is the information you're giving out  
 essential?
 Do you choose your words carefully, articulate well, and speak  
 slowly and
 clearly?
 A first-timers orientation session is problematic for numerous  
 reasons.  If
 the session is held in the main hall, using the PA system violates  
 the first
 rule of microphone etiquette because you are speaking to a smaller  
 group
 over the mike.  (Always speak to the entire hall when when using a
 microphone!)  Consequently you are training everyone else in the  
 room to
 ignore your voice--a questionable strategy for a caller on its  
 face.  If you
 attempt to teach any dance figures in your session you will face the
 additional problem created by spreading the listeners into a line,  
 which
 makes it more difficult to speak without a mike.  (This is one of many
 reasons I recommend *not *teaching any figures during the optional
 first-timer's orientation.)  It is much more effective to teach the  
 basics
 of walking and giving weight in a small circle where you can  
 communicate
 without a mike and keep the session under 10-15 minutes.
 We spend a lot of time here talking about sound engineering issues,
 microphones, and monitor speakers.  It might be more productive to  
 discuss
 how the caller can manage their own communication as well as the  
 entire
 hall.  When used appropriately an unamplified whisper can be much more
 effective than shouting through an expensive PA system.  It's not the
 volume.
 -Greg McKenzie (who has a degree in Speech Communication and sometimes
 obsesses about these things)
 ------------------------------
 _______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
 End of Callers Digest, Vol 83, Issue 21
 ***************************************