26 Mar
2010
26 Mar
'10
4:34 p.m.
How about "facing your partner" instead of "looking at your partner"?
Then it's just an orientation. Who or what you look at is your own choice.
The girls will figure out pretty quickly to look at each other to start the
move, and skilled flirts will figure out other possibilities a split second
later.
M
E
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jeff Kaufman <jeff(a)alum.swarthmore.edu>wrote;wrote:
Barbara Groh wrote:
I think all you need to do is not put strong emphasis on the looking
at your partner aspect. Something like: "dosido your neighbor. Now
dosido your neighbor again, but time do it while looking at your
partner." A simple "while looking at your partner" takes no stand on
whether one should stare at one's partner to the exclusion of everyone
else in the world, and I think no stand is needed.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
--
For the good are always the merry,
Save by an evil chance,
And the merry love the fiddle
And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
>I prefer to catch the eye of the other lady in a "girl-power, isn't this
>fun" way, since we usually start the move by passing by each other, then
>quickly shift to my partner and smile - so much more community-friendly,
>even flirtatious, IMHO, than the "I can't take my eyes off you" stare
with
>a
>person who is, after all, usually not someone I...can't take my eyes
off.
What do the rest of you think?
I think you've made an excellent point, but the trick would be explaining
all that in a walk-through without losing 3/4 of the room. Can anyone
think of a really succinct way of teaching that?