9 May
2012
9 May
'12
7:54 p.m.
I agree with Jo - the new list could not only serve to post new dances - but encourage
discussions of the dance and recommend improvements. Many callers may not be interested
in beta versions of dances
Mac
________________________________
From: "Mortland, Jo" <j-mortland(a)neiu.edu>
To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Cc: Shared Weight <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Callers] New choreo list / traffic volume
I would rather have two lists.
Jo Mortland
Sent from my iPhone
On May 9, 2012, at 2:23 PM, "Chris Weiler (home)"
<chris.weiler(a)weirdtable.org> wrote:
Hello SW callers,
I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about
starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all
callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the same
list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the callers
list volume is getting too heavy for some people.
So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_
subscribe to a choreography list?
Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think that
the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it divided into
two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's
just lurking.
Chris Weiler
Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
Craftsbury, VT
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers