Personally I prefer that the "regular dancers" do not verbally "teach"
the new dancers. Contrary to what you've described I find that
what I have learned to say succinctly and clearly during my years of calling
will take a "regular dancer" 2 or 3x the amount of time to say and by that time
the new dancer is late for the next move
AND has learned not to listen to the caller.
Please consider that some "regular dancers" who are dancing with beginners are
trying to impress them with their knowledge rather than assisting
the new dancers to learn quickly and correctly.
I agree that taking "a second to mention" (as John suggested) tricky timing or
the execution of a move "Ladies Chain: Ladies give right hands pull by
give your left to the gent for a courtesy turn" takes no more time to explain than
it takes the dancers to walk it through.
Of course this much detail is for the first and possibly second Ladies Chain of the
evening and NOT every time.
I prefer that the "regulars" teach by example and "show" by action as
I explain with words.
I do not endorse "A caller who jabbers constantly" (as you wrote)... but to
"drip-feed good ideas" (as John suggested)
throughout the evening, taking a few seconds here and a few seconds, I believe, will help
create a more cohesive dance experience
for all on the floor.
Donna Hunt
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg McKenzie <grekenzie(a)gmail.com>
To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Sent: Tue, Feb 11, 2014 4:56 pm
Subject: Re: [Callers] Circle & pass through as the last move of a dance
John wrote:
Read also mentioned "avoidance of teaching".
But we ARE teachers. You may CALL it a walk-through, but what you are
actually doing is TEACHING the dance. And if the dance will work better if
you point out some key items then go head and point them out, i.e. teach!
I know that many of us love teaching. In fact it seems to be one reason
many take up calling in the first place. But teaching from the mike at an
open, public contra dance can be very counterproductive...particularly with
regard to your efforts to integrate first-timers into the fun.
You love to teach. But so do most of the regular dancers. A big part of
the fun of partnering with newcomers is being able to guide them through
the dance and share your passion for this wonderful dance form. While the
caller is teaching verbally it is almost impossible for the regulars to
enjoy their own "teaching" role. If you really want the regulars to
partner with first-timers one of the key "tricks" is to make sure the
regulars will have time to take the lead and "teach" their partner during
the walk through.
This is what makes partnering with regulars fun, And that is why I try to
keep my prompts to an absolute minimum during the walk-through.
A caller who jabbers constantly during the walk-through can transform the
joy of a collaborative learning experience into a dreadful chore as the
regulars are required to stand by silently while the caller *explains *a
move that they could *show *their partner in less time than it would take
the caller to say the *name *of the move.
And later the caller will complain that it is so hard to get the regulars
to partner with first-timers.
Instead of "explaining" that a circle takes only "6 counts" I would
gently
suggest that callers consider simply giving the prompt "pass through" so
that it ends precisely two counts before the end of the phrase.
That way you can "say it all" with only two words and the dancers get to
keep moving in time with the live music. Make it fun!
Just a thought.
Greg McKenzie
West Coast, USA
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers