Thanks again everyone for your help,
Evidently "number one Lark" was not a good choice of term in the end!! :D
Good to know there is no standardized term like 1's and 2's for Beckets.
We used to dance only in improper formation, and I would do this "circle right 1/2
and unfold" with the #1 Raven leading out the line.
I was trying to ensure this would still work in Becket and trying to figure out the most
logical person to initiate it ...
Hopefully I am at least correct that it makes most sense for it to be the "upward
bound" Lark?
It always worked well, in improper, with the number 1 Raven.... I would demonstrate it to
the group and after 1 or 2 tries, everyone nailed it like clockwork...
Anyhow, this dance you suggested Alexandra is perfect for my needs, and I will go with it,
thank you!!
Becket
A1 Slice left, circle left once around end in a line facing down the hall next to your
partner on your home side
A2 Down the hall, turn alone come back, face partner on the side
B1 Tug into a hey passing partner right shoulder to start
B2 Partner balance and swing.
Lots of recovery time, things take 8 or 16 counts, lots of time on one’s “home" side,
hard to get lost.
KK
May 29, 2025 12:16:30 PM Alex Burka via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>et>:
The way I read Katherine's dance, the
"1s" (the couple who was facing down the hall before circling left 1/4, if you
were to get into becket that way) are in fact progressing down the hall, so is there
actually an issue here?
Playing out the dance in my head, the circle R is essentially a circle 1/2 and then
unfold, so lark 1 is facing down and has their right hand free. Then after the allemande 1
1/2 they're back on original side facing partner. Full hey brings them back to that
point again and then they progress down the hall. No?
On Thu, May 29, 2025, 10:42 AM Alexandra Deis-Lauby via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> John, the question at the moment is how to define them for dance writing purposes.
In her original dance, there is “Lark 1“ referenced. If you don’t define which side lark
one starts on you get two very different dances.
>
> In my mind, the 1s are defined as the right-file couple because they used to be the
ones facing down the hall in improper formation assuming everyone moves one place to the
left around the circle instead of right.
>
> I would argue that the dancers know it too. When I call a becket dance that
progresses backwards and don’t tell them, invariably someone waves their arms and hollers
from the floor that it’s broken and they progressed the wrong direction.
>
>
> Alex
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On May 29, 2025, at 6:59 AM, John Sweeney via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> HI Katherine,
>>
>> Numbers in Becket formation are not defined. Some callers may
number them, I have never seen a reason to. The progression is normally just clockwise or
counter-clockwise. Just tell the dancers which way to look (left or right diagonal) when
they are progressing.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you need to identify someone then I would point to one side of
the hall (or give it a name) and tell the person on that side what to do. If you give
them numbers then the numbers will change when they are out at the top or the bottom. But
that side of the hall is always that side of the hall.
>>
>>
>>
>> Flirtation Reel is a great dance, but does have a Swing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Happy dancing,
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362 & 07802 940
574
>>
>>
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in
Kent
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>> To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> _______________________________________________
> Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net