larks and robins
progressing in opposite directions or at different rates.
Although it was announced as a mixer, it was sufficiently unexpected that
chaos and discomfort ensued. I'd have been happier with that in a workshop
setting. "Dance with who's coming at you."
David, I'd love to have this dance for uh, scientific purposes and
certainly not to sow chaos 👀
--
Maia McCormick (she/her)
917.279.8194
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:02 PM David Harding via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I've attended several workshops with this
theme, led on different
occasions by Carol Ormand and Jo Mortland. A few of the exercises have
been described already, including teaching the dance to half of each couple
and not calling, messing with the music, dancing with pool noodles, and
dancing to the calling of figures with names as nonsensical as our familiar
figures are to first time dancers.
A variant on the pool noodle theme used one teddy bear in each square.
One of my favorites is a different approach to the lost dancer
situation. After the group takes hand four, the caller one dancer from
each minor set, shuffling around which one. They go to the bottom and make
new minor sets. This leaves one empty spot in each set occupied by a
ghost. The teaching and calling proceeds, with the dancers having to find
their ways through the dance without the orientation of the full set. As
the dance progresses, sometimes a whole set of four materializes,sometimes
it's three dancers, sometimes it's only two. This really emphasizes
awareness of your position in the set. It's also a useful skill when a
partner or neighbor doesn't show up at the right place and time.
I've danced with a fraction of the dancers in a contra set blindfolded.
I also remember a simple square that we danced multiple times, increasing
the number of blindfolded dancers by one each time through. Again,
positional awareness and communication.
A dance with enforced taking of everyone's less familiar role can help
build acceptance.
One time we were divided into two sets, one with all gents and the other
with all ladies. Some gents came away impressed by how violently they were
being swung around while dancing as robins while some ladies complained
about the wimpy larks they danced with. And some in both lines enjoyed the
better matches of forces and energy.
Late in a regular evening dance a caller recently threw in a contra with
larks and robins progressing in opposite directions or at different rates.
Although it was announced as a mixer, it was sufficiently unexpected that
chaos and discomfort ensued. I'd have been happier with that in a workshop
setting. "Dance with who's coming at you."
On 1/24/2024 11:35 AM, Maia McCormick via Contra Callers wrote:
Whoops, I never came back to this, but, some exercises I've
done/seen/considered:
- half the room gets the walkthrough and half doesn't, the ones who got
the walkthrough need to guide the others through the dance NONVERBALLY
- nonsense dance: substitute all the dance vocab with random words,
define a few terms for every dancer, call a nonsense dance and the hall has
to piece together what's what
- excision dance (requires real tight collab with the band): take a
simple dance and, once the hall has it, you and the band conspire to just
drop 8 or 16 counts at a time (or more!) and dancers need to get themselves
in place for the next move. E.g. if the dance ends with a chain + star and
starts with a new neighbor, you might call "robins chain... new neighbor
balance and swing" and the band goes to the top of A1 (i.e. cutting out the
last 8 beats of B2). Dancers need to know how the dance flows and where
moves start and end to compensate for missing moves
- noodly beginners: this one is a Lindsey Dono gem. You've got a bunch of
friends coming, they're raw beginners, who will volunteer to dance with
them and get them through the next dance? And the friends in question turn
out to be... pool noodles. How do dancers accommodate partners who quite
literally can't do a single thing?
- esp. in very slanted halls, I've challenged dancers to do a dance with
lots of movement up/down the line (think 3-33-33) without the sets getting
bent out of shape. That's it, that's the whole challenge.
- a good exercise on its own or can be combined with the above: practice
dropping a full hands-4 out of the set. This is a recovery skill that isn't
necessarily taught, but if e.g. one dancer has an injury or urgently needs
to drop out, the thing to do is to remove your entire hands-4 from the set
(and people can re-enter from the bottom if they still want to dance). I
ran around with various hats, placing them on people's heads to denote an
"injury"—that person had to then nonverbally get their hands-4 out of the
set, and was then licensed to put the "injury" hat on someone else's head.
(Could also be done with tagging people out.)
- i've seen some dancers put bandanas on arms/hands/shoulders to
represent an injury, and folks interacting with them need to notice and be
cognizant of it/modify around it
- i wrote my dance Neighbor, Neighbor on the Wall
<https://contra.maiamccormick.com/dances.html#neighborneighboronthewall>
for an exercise where the first time meeting this neighbor, you
communicated a preference or stylistic request about the swing, and the
second time you met them, you got to enact that preference/request.
- "practice saying no": normal dance but dancers are encouraged to
non-verbally say "no thank you" to flourishes/spins/fancy things at least n
times during the dance. Good practice for communicating and listening for
non-verbal "no's"
- beginner detection: randomly assign beginner-like dance flaws to a
number of the dancers (think "always a beat late", "dizzy",
"grips tight
and moves slow", "always looks in the wrong direction", etc.). Dancers
without an assigned flaw practice quickly evaluating someone they're
dancing with and getting a sense of skill level/whether they need extra
help, and then providing that help. (If you want to "check people's work",
you could at the end have all the assigned-beginner dances identify
themselves, and everyone else can see if they clocked folks correctly.)
I've done a lot of workshops like this so I've got a lot of junk to
suggest, ha. Hope some of this is useful (and that I haven't missed my
window for suggesting things—apologies for the delay!). Let us know how it
goes!
Cheers,
Maia
--
Maia McCormick (she/her)
917.279.8194
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 1:54 PM Emily Addison via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
Hey Folks,
Thanks so much to all those who have chimed in on the question I
posted.
Really neat that people like Richard and Joseph had experienced a
similar activity as me. And fascinating discussion about sharing weight
John, Joseph and others! I really like the idea that every allemande/swing
is a new opportunity for connecting with someone different and figuring out
that connection. I think it was Will Mentor that referred to enjoying the
little differences in every swing which made me all the more present and
noticing what I liked about different people's swings.
I'm wondering if there are any other particular fun activities to do
with dancers who already know the basics but who want to improve their
dancing ability/understanding?
:) Emily
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net