On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Michael Barraclough
<michael(a)michaelbarraclough.com> wrote:
This all suggests to me that the most important elements to concentrate
on are psychological and that overloading with facts will be
counter-productive (unless it is how to find the restrooms, water
fountains, when the break is, where the snacks are ...)
And there I agree with you. The purpose of the intro workshop is not
to teach the moves. It is to make people feel comfortable and welcome
and to provide basic info (like where are the restrooms).
Intro workshops are purely optional. As Mac mentioned we often have
third or fourth time dancers gladly join in the intro workshops 'cause
they enjoy them. That is the point. We have people who do just fine
without ever taking part in one. That is just fine, but not all new
dancers can do so.
A well run intro workshop is fun for the dancers and the callers. It
lets us talk about things that very few callers, if any, bother to
mention during the walkthrough (rightly so -- you don't want the first
walkthru to take ten minutes)
Things like thumbs(ouch), and ways to cope with being dizzy, and the
local culture/etiquette concerning who can ask whom to dance (anyone
and anyone, but the newbies don't know that) are important, but not
really appropriate topics for a walk-through. They distract from the
teaching of the dance. If the caller repeats this information
during the first few walkthroughs every week, the caller is training
the regulars to ignore the caller. The regulars know that this is the
same old message they've heard dozens of time (like the stewardess
explaining how to fasten your seat belt -- sheesh) They end up
discussing their week with their friends (loudly) and flirting with
the new dancers, etc. What message does THAT send to new dancers?
Speaking of observations (with due modesty). The dancers often laugh
and clap at the end of the intro workshop, and I have had many dancers
seek me out later in the evening to thank me for the workshop.
That is why I did not react well to Greg's message which (to me) took
a perfectly reasonable question based on observed facts and turned it
into a condemnation of the questioner's attitude based on Greg's
theory of what was going on in the mind of the person asking the
question.
Dale
Michael Barraclough
www.michaelbarraclough.com
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
--
I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have
one hell of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day
difficult.
-E. B. White