9 May
2012
9 May
'12
11:13 p.m.
Hi Chris and All,
If there was a separate choreography list, I'd want to be on it.
Having a separate list might encourage dance writers to share more
often. But what about questions about a particular non-new dance, or
requesting ideas for an event? Does that get relegated to the
choreography list too?
If dance discussion becomes a separate list, there's likely to be
cross-posting for topics that might be included in each, and I'd
likely get three different queries about the same dance - and
discussions thereof - on three different listservs. And would this
then lead to people scolding other posters about engaging in dance
discussions on the caller's list? That sounds like too much work.
The subject headers help me save or delete individual discussions well
enough, so I would rather have all the dance discussions included in
the Callers list for simplicity's sake. ND would work nicely too.
Joy Greenwolfe
Durham, NC
On May 9, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Chris Weiler (home) wrote:
Hello SW callers,
I finally caught up on my e-mail and have read the discussion about
starting a new choreography list. My thought is that most if not all
callers would want to be on both lists, so why not have them be the
same list? My only answer that I could think of why not is if the
callers list volume is getting too heavy for some people.
So I would like to know is if there are many people who would _not_
subscribe to a choreography list?
Also, what do you think of the traffic volume lately? If you think
that the volume is too heavy lately, would you rather have it
divided into two lists to increase the signal to noise ratio?
Thanks to everyone for your interest and participation, even if it's
just lurking.
Chris Weiler
Your friendly neighborhood SharedWeight moderator.
Craftsbury, VT
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers