Re: [Callers] Another vote for "jets" and "rubies"

On Jan 27, 2017, at 12:08 AM, Jim Hemphill via Callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net&gt; wrote: You can teach and call contra dances positionally without hurting anyones feelings. We are all human beings, I find it objectionable to be referred to as some form of rock or bird or whatever. The role a dancer chooses is really defined by which side of their partnership they choose to start the dance or end a swing on. Working from that basis just about any contra move can be taught or called without reference to gender. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:01 PM, via Callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> wrote: I have been calling at many venues over the years and using the role terms "gents" and "ladies" has NOT been a problem. When teaching, I explain these DO NOT refer to gender but rather to the role you are dancing. Beginners seem to understand and not have any problem. The experienced dancers are very helpful as well. I agree with Donna in the aspect of teaching a new vocabulary that goes with a movement with new words that don't have any relationship to the moves is confusing enough to me, who understands the process. Throw all this at new dancers who move from venue to venue where the terms change, makes my head hurt as well. There is an old saying "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!" Maybe we should all rethink this. -----Original Message----- From: Donna Hunt via Callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> To: contraron &lt;contraron(a)gmail.com <mailto:contraron@gmail.com>>; babsgroh &lt;babsgroh(a)gmail.com <mailto:babsgroh@gmail.com>> Cc: callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> Sent: Thu, Jan 26, 2017 12:37 pm Subject: Re: [Callers] Another vote for "jets" and "rubies" I'm sad to hear that so many groups are using different role terms and such a variety to boot. Not only do our beginners have to learn a brand new vocabulary (sometimes in a foreign language) and then remember the movement to go with those new words, but now they have to deal with remembering a role that there's no basis for, and that role term changes at different dance locations. Augh my head hurts just thinking about it. Donna -----Original Message----- From: Ron Blechner via Callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> To: Barbara Groh &lt;babsgroh(a)gmail.com <mailto:babsgroh@gmail.com>> Cc: callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> Sent: Thu, Jan 26, 2017 3:37 am Subject: Re: [Callers] Another vote for "jets" and "rubies" Let's please not presume to speak for the feelings of marginalized groups? Not thinking something is a problem because it doesn't affect you personally is super privileged. Ron Blechner On Jan 25, 2017 1:36 PM, "Barbara Groh via Callers" &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> wrote: Michael, if this view makes you a Luddite, sign me up as a member of the Luddite Club. I think it's realistic to say that the members of all the contra, English, and Square Dance groups will NEVER all agree on which alternative terms to use for ladies and gents, so all these new terms being bounced around will only cause confusion (and some eye-rolling). You've already made a solid argument for the Luddite position, so I won't say anything more....except this: Please, let's not start an argument over whether it's pejorative to use the term Luddite! Barbara Groh On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Michael Barraclough via Callers &lt;callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:callers@lists.sharedweight.net>> wrote: I guess that I am a Luddite. Here's how I see it. Somewhere between 80-90% of the population is 'straight'. Surely, we want these people as well to come to our dances. It can be difficult enough to get past the dance lingo without adding the complexity of renaming labels for people that almost everyone already understands. To me, what really matters is that we run dances where everyone accepts everyone else's sexuality; where individual dancers can feel free to dance either role; where everyone is welcome. I am not convinced that 'non-straight' individuals are put off by the historical labels that we use, rather the lack of the 3 conditions that I have just outlined. Census data show the U.S. adult population is about 239m. Searching the web I can find around 300 contra dances, 150 English Country Dances and 1000 MWSD clubs. My generous guess is that less than 100,000 people go to these dances, less than 50,000 if we ignore MWSD. Did you know that over 700,000 people in the U.S. own a ferret? That means there are 7x as many people in the USA who own a ferret compared to the number of people who go to our dances! Let's put less rather than more barriers in the way of getting those who don't dance with us (that's 99.6% of the population) to join us. Michael Barraclough www.michaelbarraclough.com <http://www.michaelbarraclough.com/> On Tue, 2017-01-24 at 16:19 -0500, Ron Blechner via Callers wrote: _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net <http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net <http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net <http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net <http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net <mailto:Callers@lists.sharedweight.net> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net <http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net> _______________________________________________ Callers mailing list Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net