Birdie in the Cage is an easy one. I tell couples to choose who is the birdie and who is
the crow, then I don't care what genders they are or if they open up with the woman on
the right, and the calls are all "birdie in the cage, birdie hop out and crow hop
in" anyway. I do a break figure where I call "crows" (or birdies) to the
center with a right hand star, back by the left, see your partner do-si-do, swing (elbow
or two hand turn if regular swing is too complicated), promenade around. If I have five
couples that want to dance, I just do it with a five couple "square", have them
number themselves 1-5, and it all works. 
Martha
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:10 PM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
  Send Callers mailing list submissions to
 	callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 	
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 	callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
 	callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
   1. Re: Quiet or am I no longer getting posts? (Robert Livingston)
   2. Re: Hmmm (Kalia Kliban)
   3. Re: Hmmm (James Saxe)
   4. Re: Quiet or am I no longer getting posts? (James Saxe)
   5. ONS Squares from Beth (Jerome Grisanti)
   6. Re: ONS Squares from Beth (James Saxe)
   7. Re: ONS Squares from Beth (James Saxe)
 
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
 From: Robert Livingston <rlivngstn(a)yahoo.com>
 To: "callers(a)sharedweight.net" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Quiet or am I no longer getting posts?
 Message-ID:
 	<1348416192.54369.YahooMailNeo(a)web112605.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 Lots of circle lefts, forward & backs and? promenades as you would in a circle dance
 Single active couple; out to the right and circle 4 - leave that couple (important that
you say this)
 on to the next and circle 4, etc? All home with forward and back and/or promenades.? Use
fiddle tunes or simple songs: Red River Valley, You Are My Sunshine
 All forward and back, ladies (gents) center back to back, gents go right single file.
goin' wrong, other way back.? Swing corner, whatever;? Use fiddle tunes, maybe
Comin' Round the Mtn.
 
 Last night at a wedding reception: 1st couple back to back separate around the outside of
the set? (could swing each other as they pass half-way round)? All the way around swing
into the center while we circle 6 hands around? All home swing and promenade.? Fiddle tune
or Wabash Cannonball, something like that.
 
 Also did Little Sisters Make a Ring - added the men using arm turn/stars rather than a
circle (rings)
 in the center
 
 Buffalo Gals / Marching Through Georgia / Cage the Bird, 7 Hands round / Grapevine Twist
 A simple Forward 6 - all F& B, head or side gents bring back the ladies held in each
hand - do something simple here, not right hand high left hand under.
 
 Using heads or sides, make up your own quadrille but rather than using chains, do
something like heads forward, gents bring back opposite lady, or gents cross to swing. 
 
 
 Cutaway dances 6-4-2 - Dancers with one couple is working and no partner changes are
good.
 
 Grand right and left without allemandes.
 
 Lots of circle lefts, forward and backs and promenades; show 2 hand swings (a swing is
just a 2 person circle left for all ages)? if the dancers are getting disorientated and
jumpy with elbow swings.
 
 The bonding can be deeper between couples in a square set - you can't drop out - you
are recognized individually and as being responsible to the rest - so you pull for each
other.? I'm glad to see squares getting more attention in Country Dance.
 
 Bob Livingston
 Middletown, CT
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ________________________________
 From: Delia Clark <deliaclark8(a)gmail.com>
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net> 
 Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:03 AM
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Quiet or am I no longer getting posts?
 
 Which squares did you do?? I find that some of my squares fall apart as easily as duple
minors with new dancers, but it may just be my calling :-)? My stand-bys for less
experienced dancers are: Simple Square, Cumberland Square 8 and Redwing.? Can you
recommend others?!
 
 
 On Sep 23, 2012, at 9:58 AM, beth(a)hands4.com wrote:
 
  I have not seen a post on this list since May.
I'm wondering if I have been dropped or are you all just being very quiet? Or is
something else going on?
 
 To keep this on topic just in case it gets posted: I had a wonderful one nighter last
night. Three squares in a large garage. All circles and squares and the Virginia Reel. I
would never try to do a duple minor at an event like that. The group was very, very happy.
Squares rule!
 
 Beth Parkes
 <winmail.dat>_______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers  
 
 <>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>
 
 Delia Clark
 PO Box 45
 Taftsville, VT 05073
 802-457-2075
 deliaclark8(a)gmail.com
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
 
 ------------------------------
 
 Message: 2
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 09:19:42 -0700
 From: Kalia Kliban <kalia(a)sbcglobal.net>
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Hmmm
 Message-ID: <505F369E.3050509(a)sbcglobal.net>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 
 On 9/23/2012 8:10 AM, beth(a)hands4.com wrote:
  I just noticed that I have gotten lots of
messages this late summer/fall.  But it has been quiet for the last couple of weeks. Sorry
to mislead on my original post.
 Beth 
 
 I know what you mean though, it was awfully quiet for a while.  I 
 noticed it too.
 
 Kalia
 
 
 ------------------------------
 
 Message: 3
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:13:02 -0700
 From: James Saxe <jim.saxe(a)gmail.com>
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Hmmm
 Message-ID: <EC04F764-79A8-49AC-B112-8F4F491C93A6(a)gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
 
 If anyone ever wonders whether their mail from (or to)
 this group--the SharedWeight callers forum--isn't getting
 through, one way to check would be to look at the archive
 
     
http://www.sharedweight.net/pipermail/callers/
 
 and see whether the latest archived messages have reached
 your inbox (or whether the last messages you've sent have
 been archived).
 
 It's also easy to navigate from the SharedWeight home page
 to the archives for the other SW forums.
 
 --Jim
 
 On Sep 23, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Kalia Kliban wrote:
 
  On 9/23/2012 8:10 AM, beth(a)hands4.com wrote:
  I just noticed that I have gotten lots of
messages this late summer/ 
 fall.  But it has been quiet for the last couple of weeks. Sorry to  
 mislead on my original post.
 Beth 
 
 I know what you mean though, it was awfully quiet for a while.  I  
 noticed it too.
 
 Kalia
 _______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers  
 
 
 ------------------------------
 
 Message: 4
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 14:15:43 -0700
 From: James Saxe <jim.saxe(a)gmail.com>
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] Quiet or am I no longer getting posts?
 Message-ID: <EC7C10F7-7F85-4C63-9D2B-CB2A8C18CD78(a)gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
 
 On Sep 23, 2012, at 8:05 AM, beth(a)hands4.com wrote:
 
  Here's my program for last night:
 
 ...
 
 Since private party dances are first and foremost a party, the  
 breaks are longer than at other dances, and the dancing shorter. .... 
 
 I'd be interested in hearing what Beth, or anyone else, does
 to get people back onto the floor after a break (or at the
 beginning of the dancing) at ONS events.
 
     *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *
 
 One of the few ONS gigs I've called was a company party where
 the band's repertoire included songs as well as dance music.
 The format for the event, announced well in advance, was dinner
 followed by dancing.  I don't recall whether the dancing was
 described as "square" dancing, "barn dance" or what, but I'm
 pretty sure people were expecting some kind of dancing with
 a caller/teacher/leader, not jut a band playing current popular
 music that they could bop around to.
 
 Anyway, when people were pretty much finished with dinner, the
 band started with a song.  This helped get people's attention
 and let them know that the dancing was about to start.  (There
 might also have been some announcement by someone from the
 company before or after the song.)  Then we did two or three
 dances, and took a break for a few minutes.  I decided that
 starting with a song had worked well, and the band had more
 songs that they were interested in playing, so we followed
 the same pattern for the rest of the evening, using a song to
 mark the end of each break and the start of the next set of
 dances.
 
 The pattern of song, dances, break, song, dances  break, ...
 seemed to work very nicely on that particular occasion.  I
 don't have enough experience with ONS gigs to say when and
 would or wouldn't be good in general.  Obviously, it wouldn't
 work with a non-singing band.  Also, I think the songs helped
 connect the band and the attendees in ways that would have been
 irrelevant for an event where the caller was using recorded
 music.
 
     *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *
 
 One topic I've always discussed with event organizers before
 taking on a ONS gig is whether the organizer is committed to
 helping get people onto the dance floor, including by getting
 onto the floor him/herself and also by making sure that the
 dance aspect of the event is well publicized in advance
 (including, btw, the fact that it's a kind of dancing where
 high heels are strongly discouraged).
 
     *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *    *
 
 At weddings, a grand march led by the bride and groom (with
 caller and a partner as the couple just behind) can be an
 effective way to gather people for dancing.  You can meander
 around past all the tables, etc. and people will see a that
 there's something going on that (a) involves the wedding couple
 and (b) is clearly simple enough for everyone to join in.  Once
 you've got a nice long parade of couples, you can lead them
 around into a circle and--poof!--you're set up for a simple
 circle dance.
 
 One word of caution, though.  The first time I did this, the
 band (an Irish band that I hadn't worked with before, hired
 by the wedding couple) played rahhther faster than I was
 expecting for the circle dance (a mixer), and it didn't seem
 as if slowing them down on the fly was going to be a happening
 thing.  I noticed an older woman (perhaps an aunt of the bride
 or groom?) who looked like she might be tiring and wanting to
 drop out, but not doing so lest she abandon her partner of the
 moment.  I was just about to signal the band to go out when a
 woman on the sidelines also noticed and stepped in to take the
 place of the tiring dancer.  So I let the dance run a few more
 rounds (still not as long as I'd have run it, even for a
 "non-dancer" crowd, if the tempo were more moderate), before
 stopping.  And then I talked with the band about keeping the
 tempo more moderate for the remaining dances.
 
 --Jim
 
 
 
 
 
 ------------------------------
 
 Message: 5
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:24:38 -0500
 From: Jerome Grisanti <jerome.grisanti(a)gmail.com>
 To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
 Subject: [Callers] ONS Squares from Beth
 Message-ID:
 	<CAD6SnUTG3gHgjF7mNhuTTw=pwW-TkEB4PioSRM1eEJFnGTRUgw(a)mail.gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 Beth,
 
 I enjoyed picturing all those squares you shared -- sure sounds like a fun
 program. I do have a question about Kitchen Lancers. Since you indicated
 well-phrased New Englandy tunes, does that break evenly into an AABB
 structure? If so, can you indicate those phrases? I also presume that after
 the sides jump in, the formation resembles a longways proper set as for
 Virginia Reel. Is the sliding across the hall (couples), or up and down the
 hall (lines)?
 
 Kitchen Lancers - well phrased New Englandy tunes
 
 First couple promenade inside the square, face out
 Sides jump in behind the ones into lines.
 Forward & Back
 Slide right & left
 Lady one lead the line of ladies around the line of gents
 Gent one lead the line of gents around the line of ladies
 Face partner, lines go BACK and forward
 Swing partner home to place in square
 All forward & back twice
 
 
 -- 
 Jerome Grisanti
 660-528-0858
 
http://www.jeromegrisanti.com
 
 For the good are always the merry,
 Save by an evil chance,
 And the merry love the fiddle
 And the merry love to dance. ~ William Butler Yeats
 
 
 ------------------------------
 
 Message: 6
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:07:05 -0700
 From: James Saxe <jim.saxe(a)gmail.com>
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] ONS Squares from Beth
 Message-ID: <71C345BE-06DB-439B-A47A-82374D8CD556(a)gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
 
 On Sep 23, 2012, at 8:24 PM, Jerome Grisanti wrote:
 
  Beth,
 
 I enjoyed picturing all those squares you shared -- ... 
 
 I enjoyed seeing the descriptions of Beth's squares also,
 and I have different question for Beth than Jerome had.
 
 Beth, you described the square "Ladies Chain" (named after
 a featured figure) as a "quasi-singing call" and you described
 "Heads Arch" as done "with Midwestern patter calling" but your
 descriptions of both dances simply state the choreography
 without giving the calls.  Could you share the "quasi-singing"
 words you use for "Ladies Chain" and the patter you use for
 "Heads Arch"?  If so, it could be helpful if you would also
 give some indication of the timing, for example by writing out
 the calls 4 or 8 beats to a line with black lines lines
 separating 8-bar or 16-bar chunks.
 
 I recognize that call timing can sometimes involve syncopations
 or other nuances that are very hard to communicate in print
 without the aid of an audio recording.  I also recognize that
 any caller who wanted to use one of these dances would have the
 responsibility of adapting the calls, if necessary, to a form
 that he or she could deliver comfortably and effectively to
 dancers present.  But I'd still be interesting in seeing call
 lines that you might use.
 
 --Jim
 
 
 
 ------------------------------
 
 Message: 7
 Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:10:44 -0700
 From: James Saxe <jim.saxe(a)gmail.com>
 To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
 Subject: Re: [Callers] ONS Squares from Beth
 Message-ID: <9934B32B-D776-46A6-9D14-513ABA68A76D(a)gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
 
 On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:07 PM, I (Jim Saxe) wrote:
 
  ... some indication of the timing, for example by
writing out
 the calls 4 or 8 beats to a line with black lines lines
 separating 8-bar or 16-bar chunks. 
 
 Ooops.  The words "black lines lines" should have read
 "blank lines".
 
 --Jim
 
 
 
 ------------------------------
 
 _______________________________________________
 Callers mailing list
 Callers(a)sharedweight.net
 
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
 
 
 End of Callers Digest, Vol 97, Issue 13
 ***************************************