I think maybe a comment I made may have added to this. When I said I'd use
dbl prog it was specifically in relation to low dancer #'s and using 4 face
4 or 3 face 3. Not contra lines. Rarely would I use a dbl prog unless I
have longer lines and doing contras.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 2:39 AM Chris Page via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I'm dubious about using double progression in
short lines.
If there's an odd number of couples in the line:
In a single progression dance, there's always one couple out,
alternating between the top and the bottom of the line.
In a double progression dance, there's always one couple out at the
bottom of the line.
If there's an even number of couples in the line:
In a single progression dance, it alternates between 0 and 2 couples
out at the ends, for an time-average of 1 couple out.
In a double progression dance with two individual progressions (like
Awesome Double Progression Dance), for half of one time through the
dance, 0 couples are out, and for the other half of the time through a
dance, there are 2 couples out at the ends, for a time-average of 1
couple out. And you always do the first half of the dance sequence
with the same half of the couples.
In a double progression dance where you progress all at once (like the
left diagonal right-and-left-through of Becket Reel), everyone's
always in. But you only dance with half the couples, which is more
noticeable in short lines.
Cheers,
-Chris Page
Los Angeles, CA
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net