I think maybe a comment I made may have added to this. When I said I'd use
dbl prog it was specifically in relation to low dancer #'s and using 4 face
4 or 3 face 3. Not contra lines. Rarely would I use a dbl prog unless I
have longer lines and doing contras.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022, 2:39 AM Chris Page via Contra Callers <
contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
  I'm dubious about using double progression in
short lines.
 If there's an odd number of couples in the line:
 In a single progression dance, there's always one couple out,
 alternating between the top and the bottom of the line.
 In a double progression dance, there's always one couple out at the
 bottom of the line.
 If there's an even number of couples in the line:
 In a single progression dance, it alternates between 0 and 2 couples
 out at the ends, for an time-average of 1 couple out.
 In a double progression dance with two individual progressions (like
 Awesome Double Progression Dance), for half of one time through the
 dance, 0 couples are out, and for the other half of the time through a
 dance, there are 2 couples out at the ends, for a time-average of 1
 couple out. And you always do the first half of the dance sequence
 with the same half of the couples.
 In a double progression dance where you progress all at once (like the
 left diagonal right-and-left-through of Becket Reel), everyone's
 always in. But you only dance with half the couples, which is more
 noticeable in short lines.
 Cheers,
 -Chris Page
 Los Angeles, CA
 _______________________________________________
 Contra Callers mailing list -- contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
 To unsubscribe send an email to contracallers-leave(a)lists.sharedweight.net